Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Apurv Shukla 0001

dblp:168/0656-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 53% Learning theory · 27% 3D vision · 20%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 72% Mathematical optimization · 28%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
0.812024
Preference-based Pure Exploration · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
pure exploration
0.812024
Preference-based Pure Exploration · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.812024
Preference-based Pure Exploration · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation
0.612022
Robust Streaming PCA · NeurIPS 2022
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis
0.612022
Robust Streaming PCA · NeurIPS 2022
Algorithms and data structures › data streams › streaming algorithms
streaming PCA
0.612022
Robust Streaming PCA · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.212024
Preference-based Pure Exploration · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.212024
Preference-based Pure Exploration · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

track-and-stop · 1.5concentration inequalities · 1.5oja's algorithm · 1.1noisy power method · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 FraPPE: Fast and Efficient Preference-Based Pure Exploration
abstract
Preference-based Pure Exploration (PrePEx) aims to identify with a given confidence level the set of Pareto optimal arms in a vector-valued (aka multi-objective) bandit, where the reward vectors are ordered via a (given) preference cone $\mathcal C$. Though PrePEx and its variants are well-studied, there does not exist a *computationally efficient* algorithm that can *optimally* track the existing lower bound (Shukla and Basu, 2024) for arbitrary preference cones. We successfully fill this gap by efficiently solving the minimisation and maximisation problems in the lower bound. First, we derive three structural properties of the lower bound that yield a computationally tractable reduction of the minimisation problem. Then, we deploy a Frank-Wolfe optimiser to accelerate the maximisation problem in the lower bound. Together, these techniques solve the maxmin optimisation problem in $\mathcal O(KL^{2})$ time for a bandit instance with $K$ arms and $L$ dimensional reward, which is a significant acceleration over the literature. We further prove that our proposed PrePEx algorithm, **FraPPE**, asymptotically achieves the optimal sample complexity. Finally, we perform numerical experiments across synthetic and real datasets demonstrating that **FraPPE** achieves the lowest sample complexities to identify the exact Pareto set among the existing algorithms.
Udvas Das, Apurv Shukla 0001, Debabrota Basu
NeurIPS2
2024 Preference-based Pure Exploration
abstract
We study the preference-based pure exploration problem for bandits with vector-valued rewards and a set of preferences imposed over them. Specifically, we aim to identify the most preferred policy over a set of arms according to the preferences induced on the reward vectors by an ordering cone $C$. First, to quantify the impact of preferences, we derive a novel lower bound on the sample complexity for identifying the most preferred arm with confidence level $1-\delta$. Our lower bound shows that how the geometry of the preferences and reward vectors changes the hardness of this problem. We further explicate this geometry for Gaussian distributions of rewards, and provide a convex reformulation of the lower bound solvable with linear programming. Then, we leverage this convex reformulation of the lower bound to design the Track and Stop with Preferences (TSwP) algorithm that identifies the most preferred policy. Finally, we derive a new concentration result for vector-valued rewards, and show that TSwP achieves a matching sample complexity upper bound.
Apurv Shukla 0001, Debabrota Basu
NeurIPS1
2022 Robust Streaming PCA
abstract
We consider streaming principal component analysis when the stochastic data-generating model is subject to perturbations. While existing models assume a fixed covariance, we adopt a robust perspective where the covariance matrix belongs to a temporal uncertainty set. Under this setting, we provide fundamental limits on any algorithm recovering principal components. We analyze the convergence of the noisy power method and Oja’s algorithm, both studied for the stationary data generating model, and argue that the noisy power method is rate-optimal in our setting. Finally, we demonstrate the validity of our analysis through numerical experiments.
Daniel Bienstock, Minchan Jeong, Apurv Shukla 0001, Se-Young Yun
NeurIPS3
2015 A modified bat algorithm for the Quadratic Assignment Problem
abstract
Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP) is a discrete search space problem where one has to find the perfect feasible permutation of locations which minimizes the objective function. This paper solves the quadratic assignment problem using bat algorithm. Bat algorithm cannot be directly applied for solving QAP as it generates a solution for continuous search space problems. Therefore, we use a heuristic rule called Smallest Position Value (SPV) to enable our algorithm for finding solutions for sequencing problems. The modified algorithm completely outperforms the particle swarm optimization algorithm in all the cases considered.
Apurv Shukla 0001
CEC1