Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Falkner

dblp:168/1232 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8004-5062ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 39% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 12%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
1.842024
MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2024
Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2020
BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scale · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
1.232022
Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scale · ICML 2018
Bayesian Optimization with Robust Bayesian Neural Networks · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
1.122022
Trading off Image Quality for Robustness is not Necessary with Regularized Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2022
Shape your Space: A Gaussian Mixture Regularization Approach to Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › autoencoder
deterministic autoencoder
1.122022
Trading off Image Quality for Robustness is not Necessary with Regularized Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2022
Shape your Space: A Gaussian Mixture Regularization Approach to Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
meta-learning for bayesian optimization
0.812024
MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model
0.812024
MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.722022
Shape your Space: A Gaussian Mixture Regularization Approach to Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2021
Trading off Image Quality for Robustness is not Necessary with Regularized Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.612022
Trading off Image Quality for Robustness is not Necessary with Regularized Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
automated machine learning
0.612022
Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.612022
Trading off Image Quality for Robustness is not Necessary with Regularized Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
latent space regularization
0.512021
Shape your Space: A Gaussian Mixture Regularization Approach to Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.412020
Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA design
0.412019
Learning to Design RNA · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA design
RNA inverse folding
0.412019
Learning to Design RNA · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
bandit optimization
0.312018
BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scale · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory › learning dynamics
learning curve prediction
0.312017
Learning Curve Prediction with Bayesian Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo › hamiltonian monte carlo
stochastic gradient hamiltonian monte carlo
0.212016
Bayesian Optimization with Robust Bayesian Neural Networks · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
task similarity
0.212024
MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial vulnerability
0.212022
Trading off Image Quality for Robustness is not Necessary with Regularized Deterministic Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks
0.112017
Learning Curve Prediction with Bayesian Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 1.6likelihood-free inference · 0.8auxiliary model · 0.8two-point kolmogorov-smirnov test · 0.6budget allocation · 0.6bandit strategy · 0.6adversarial training · 0.6bayesian neural network · 0.5gaussian mixture regularization · 0.5density estimation · 0.5machine learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Scalable Meta-Learning with Gaussian Processes
abstract
Meta-learning is a powerful approach that exploits historical data to quickly solve new tasks from the same distribution. In the low-data regime, methods based on the closed-form posterior of Gaussian processes (GP) together with Bayesian optimization have achieved high performance. However, these methods are either computationally expensive or introduce assumptions that hinder a principled propagation of uncertainty between task models. This may disrupt the balance between exploration and exploitation during optimization. In this paper, we develop ScaML-GP, a modular GP model for meta-learning that is scalable in the number of tasks. Our core contribution is carefully designed multi-task kernel that enables hierarchical training and task scalability. Conditioning ScaML-GP on the meta-data exposes its modular nature yielding a test-task prior that combines the posteriors of meta-task GPs. In synthetic and real-world meta-learning experiments, we demonstrate that ScaML-GP can learn efficiently both with few and many meta-tasks.
Petru Tighineanu, Lukas Großberger, Paul Baireuther, Kathrin Skubch, Stefan Falkner, Julia Vinogradska, Felix Berkenkamp
AISTATS5
2024 MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization
abstract
Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular method to optimize costly black-box functions, and meta-learning has emerged as a way to leverage knowledge from related tasks to optimize new tasks faster. However, existing meta-learning methods for BO rely on surrogate models that are not scalable or are sensitive to varying input scales and noise types across tasks. Moreover, they often overlook the uncertainty associated with task similarity, leading to unreliable task adaptation when a new task differs significantly or has not been sufficiently explored yet. We propose a novel meta-learning BO approach that bypasses the surrogate model and directly learns the utility of queries across tasks. It explicitly models task uncertainty and includes an auxiliary model to enable robust adaptation to new tasks. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves strong performance and outperforms multiple meta-learning BO methods across various benchmarks.
Jiarong Pan, Stefan Falkner, Felix Berkenkamp, Joaquin Vanschoren
ICML2
2022 Trading off Image Quality for Robustness is not Necessary with Regularized Deterministic Autoencoders
abstract
The susceptibility of Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) to adversarial attacks indicates the necessity to evaluate the robustness of the learned representations along with the generation performance. The vulnerability of VAEs has been attributed to the limitations associated with their variational formulation. Deterministic autoencoders could overcome the practical limitations associated with VAEs and offer a promising alternative for image generation applications. In this work, we propose an adversarially robust deterministic autoencoder with superior performance in terms of both generation and robustness of the learned representations. We introduce a regularization scheme to incorporate adversarially perturbed data points to the training pipeline without increasing the computational complexity or compromising the generation fidelity by leveraging a loss based on the two-point Kolmogorov–Smirnov test between representations. We conduct extensive experimental studies on popular image benchmark datasets to quantify the robustness of the proposed approach based on the adversarial attacks targeted at VAEs. Our empirical findings show that the proposed method achieves significant performance in both robustness and fidelity when compared to the robust VAE models.
Amrutha Saseendran, Kathrin Skubch, Stefan Falkner, Margret Keuper
NeurIPS3
2022 Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learning
abstract
Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) supports practitioners and researchers with the tedious task of designing machine learning pipelines and has recently achieved substantial success. In this paper, we introduce new AutoML approaches motivated by our winning submission to the second ChaLearn AutoML challenge. We develop PoSH Auto-sklearn, which enables AutoML systems to work well on large datasets under rigid time limits by using a new, simple and meta-feature-free meta-learning technique and by employing a successful bandit strategy for budget allocation. However, PoSH Auto-sklearn introduces even more ways of running AutoML and might make it harder for users to set it up correctly. Therefore, we also go one step further and study the design space of AutoML itself, proposing a solution towards truly hands-free AutoML. Together, these changes give rise to the next generation of our AutoML system, Auto-sklearn 2.0 . We verify the improvements by these additions in an extensive experimental study on 39 AutoML benchmark datasets. We conclude the paper by comparing to other popular AutoML frameworks and Auto-sklearn 1.0 , reducing the relative error by up to a factor of 4.5, and yielding a performance in 10 minutes that is substantially better than what Auto-sklearn 1.0 achieves within an hour.
Matthias Feurer 0001, Katharina Eggensperger, Stefan Falkner, Marius Lindauer, Frank Hutter
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2021 Shape your Space: A Gaussian Mixture Regularization Approach to Deterministic Autoencoders
abstract
Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) are powerful probabilistic models to learn representations of complex data distributions. One important limitation of VAEs is the strong prior assumption that latent representations learned by the model follow a simple uni-modal Gaussian distribution. Further, the variational training procedure poses considerable practical challenges. Recently proposed regularized autoencoders offer a deterministic autoencoding framework, that simplifies the original VAE objective and is significantly easier to train. Since these models only provide weak control over the learned latent distribution, they require an ex-post density estimation step to generate samples comparable to those of VAEs. In this paper, we propose a simple and end-to-end trainable deterministic autoencoding framework, that efficiently shapes the latent space of the model during training and utilizes the capacity of expressive multi-modal latent distributions. The proposed training procedure provides direct evidence if the latent distribution adequately captures complex aspects of the encoded data. We show in experiments the expressiveness and sample quality of our model in various challenging continuous and discrete domains. An implementation is available at https://github.com/boschresearch/GMM_DAE.
Amrutha Saseendran, Kathrin Skubch, Stefan Falkner, Margret Keuper
NeurIPS3
2020 Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimization
Michael Volpp, Lukas P. Fröhlich, Kirsten Fischer, Andreas Doerr, Stefan Falkner, Frank Hutter, Christian Daniel
ICLR5
2019 Learning to Design RNA
Frederic Runge, Danny Stoll, Stefan Falkner, Frank Hutter
ICLR (Poster)3
2019 Optimizing Neural Networks for Patent Classification
Louay Abdelgawad, Peter Klügl, Erdan Genc, Stefan Falkner, Frank Hutter
ECML/PKDD (3)4
2018 BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scale
abstract
Modern deep learning methods are very sensitive to many hyperparameters, and, due to the long training times of state-of-the-art models, vanilla Bayesian hyperparameter optimization is typically computationally infeasible. On the other hand, bandit-based configuration evaluation approaches based on random search lack guidance and do not converge to the best configurations as quickly. Here, we propose to combine the benefits of both Bayesian optimization and bandit-based methods, in order to achieve the best of both worlds: strong anytime performance and fast convergence to optimal configurations. We propose a new practical state-of-the-art hyperparameter optimization method, which consistently outperforms both Bayesian optimization and Hyperband on a wide range of problem types, including high-dimensional toy functions, support vector machines, feed-forward neural networks, Bayesian neural networks, deep reinforcement learning, and convolutional neural networks. Our method is robust and versatile, while at the same time being conceptually simple and easy to implement.
Stefan Falkner, Aaron Klein, Frank Hutter
ICML1
2017 Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasets
abstract
Bayesian optimization has become a successful tool for hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms, such as support vector machines or deep neural networks. Despite its success, for large datasets, training and validating a single configuration often takes hours, days, or even weeks, which limits the achievable performance. To accelerate hyperparameter optimization, we propose a generative model for the validation error as a function of training set size, which is learned during the optimization process and allows exploration of preliminary configurations on small subsets, by extrapolating to the full dataset. We construct a Bayesian optimization procedure, dubbed FABOLAS, which models loss and training time as a function of dataset size and automatically trades off high information gain about the global optimum against computational cost. Experiments optimizing support vector machines and deep neural networks show that FABOLAS often finds high-quality solutions 10 to 100 times faster than other state-of-the-art Bayesian optimization methods or the recently proposed bandit strategy Hyperband.
Aaron Klein, Stefan Falkner, Simon Bartels, Philipp Hennig, Frank Hutter
AISTATS2
2017 Learning Curve Prediction with Bayesian Neural Networks
Aaron Klein, Stefan Falkner, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Frank Hutter
ICLR (Poster)2
2016 Bayesian Optimization with Robust Bayesian Neural Networks
abstract
Bayesian optimization is a prominent method for optimizing expensive to evaluate black-box functions that is prominently applied to tuning the hyperparameters of machine learning algorithms. Despite its successes, the prototypical Bayesian optimization approach - using Gaussian process models - does not scale well to either many hyperparameters or many function evaluations. Attacking this lack of scalability and flexibility is thus one of the key challenges of the field. We present a general approach for using flexible parametric models (neural networks) for Bayesian optimization, staying as close to a truly Bayesian treatment as possible. We obtain scalability through stochastic gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, whose robustness we improve via a scale adaptation. Experiments including multi-task Bayesian optimization with 21 tasks, parallel optimization of deep neural networks and deep reinforcement learning show the power and flexibility of this approach.
Jost Tobias Springenberg, Aaron Klein, Stefan Falkner, Frank Hutter
NIPS3
2015 SpySMAC: Automated Configuration and Performance Analysis of SAT Solvers
Stefan Falkner, Marius Lindauer, Frank Hutter
SAT1