Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Behnam Montazeri
dblp:168/3489
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-3045-0838ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 6 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
4 papers |
Datacenter networks · 61% Transport protocols and congestion control · 37% Network measurement and analytics · 2% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Storage systems · 43% Cloud and datacenter computing · 33% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 21% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transport protocols and congestion control
delay-based congestion control |
1.3 | 2 | 2025 | Falcon: A Reliable, Low Latency Hardware Transport · SIGCOMM 2025 Swift: Delay is Simple and Effective for Congestion Control in the Datacenter · SIGCOMM 2020 |
Datacenter networks › load balancing
multipath load balancing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Falcon: A Reliable, Low Latency Hardware Transport · SIGCOMM 2025 |
Datacenter networks › datacenter transport
datacenter congestion control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Swift: Delay is Simple and Effective for Congestion Control in the Datacenter · SIGCOMM 2020 |
Datacenter networks › low-latency networking
tail latency reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Swift: Delay is Simple and Effective for Congestion Control in the Datacenter · SIGCOMM 2020 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › multi-tenancy
multi-tenant datacenter |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | 1RMA: Re-envisioning Remote Memory Access for Multi-tenant Datacenters · SIGCOMM 2020 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
remote direct memory access |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | 1RMA: Re-envisioning Remote Memory Access for Multi-tenant Datacenters · SIGCOMM 2020 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › flow control
receiver-based flow control |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Homa: a receiver-driven low-latency transport protocol using network priorities · SIGCOMM 2018 |
Transport protocols and congestion control
transport protocols |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Homa: a receiver-driven low-latency transport protocol using network priorities · SIGCOMM 2018 |
Storage systems
crash recovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The RAMCloud Storage System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2015 |
Storage systems › key-value storage
in-memory key-value store |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The RAMCloud Storage System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2015 |
Storage systems
key-value storage |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The RAMCloud Storage System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2015 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | The RAMCloud Storage System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2015 |
Network measurement and analytics
latency measurement |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Homa: a receiver-driven low-latency transport protocol using network priorities · SIGCOMM 2018 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter storage |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | The RAMCloud Storage System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2015 |
Memory systems
DRAM |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | The RAMCloud Storage System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
programmable engine · 0.9hardware retransmission · 0.9pacing · 0.4RTT measurement · 0.4AIMD · 0.4simulation · 0.3priority queueing · 0.3polling-based communication · 0.2log-structured storage · 0.2kernel bypass · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Falcon: A Reliable, Low Latency Hardware TransportabstractHardware transports such as RoCE deliver high performance with minimal host CPU, but are best suited to special-purpose deployments that limit their use, e.g., backend networks or Ethernet with Priority Flow Control (PFC). We introduce Falcon, the first hardware transport that supports multiple Upper Layer Protocols (ULPs) and heterogeneous application workloads in general-purpose Ethernet datacenter environments (with losses and without special switch support). Key design elements include: delay-based congestion control with multipath load balancing; a layered design with a simple request-response transaction interface for multi-ULP support; hardware-based retransmissions and error-handling for scalability; and a programmable engine for flexibility. The first Falcon hardware implementation delivers a peak performance of 200 Gbps, 120 Mops/sec, with near-optimal operation completion times that are up to 8× lower than CX-7 RoCE under network congestion, and up to 65% higher goodput under lossy conditions. Arjun Singhvi, Nandita Dukkipati, Prashant Chandra, Hassan M. G. Wassel, Naveen Kr. Sharma, Anthony Rebello, Henry Schuh, Praveen Kumar 0003, Behnam Montazeri, Neelesh Bansod, Sarin Thomas, Inho Cho, Hyojeong Lee Seibert, Baijun Wu, Rui Yang 0034, Qianwen Yin, Srinivas Vaduvatha, Weihuang Wang, Masoud Moshref, David Wetherall, Amin Vahdat |
SIGCOMM | 9 |
| 2022 | Understanding host interconnect congestionabstractWe present evidence and characterization of host congestion in production clusters: adoption of high-bandwidth access links leading to emergence of bottlenecks within the host interconnect (NIC-to-CPU data path). We demonstrate that contention on existing IO memory management units and/or the memory subsystem can significantly reduce the available NIC-to-CPU bandwidth, resulting in hundreds of microseconds of queueing delays and eventual packet drops at hosts (even when running a state-of-the-art congestion control protocol that accounts for CPU-induced host congestion). We also discuss implications of host interconnect congestion to design of future host architecture, network stacks and network protocols. Saksham Agarwal, Rachit Agarwal 0001, Behnam Montazeri, Masoud Moshref, Khaled Elmeleegy, Luigi Rizzo, Marc de Kruijf, Gautam Kumar 0001, Sylvia Ratnasamy, David E. Culler, Amin Vahdat |
HotNets | 3 |
| 2022 | Aquila: A unified, low-latency fabric for datacenter networks
Dan Gibson, Hema Hariharan, Eric Lance, Moray McLaren, Behnam Montazeri, Hassan M. G. Wassel, Zhehua Wu, Sunghwan Yoo, Raghuraman Balasubramanian, Prashant Chandra, Michael Cutforth, Peter Cuy, David Decotigny, Rakesh Gautam, Alex Iriza, Milo M. K. Martin, Rick Roy, Zuowei Shen, Monica Wong-Chan, Joe Zbiciak, Amin Vahdat |
NSDI | 5 |
| 2020 | Swift: Delay is Simple and Effective for Congestion Control in the DatacenterabstractWe report on experiences with Swift congestion control in Google datacenters. Swift targets an end-to-end delay by using AIMD control, with pacing under extreme congestion. With accurate RTT measurement and care in reasoning about delay targets, we find this design is a foundation for excellent performance when network distances are well-known. Importantly, its simplicity helps us to meet operational challenges. Delay is easy to decompose into fabric and host components to separate concerns, and effortless to deploy and maintain as a congestion signal while the datacenter evolves. In large-scale testbed experiments, Swift delivers a tail latency of <50μs for short RPCs, with near-zero packet drops, while sustaining ~100Gbps throughput per server. This is a tail of <3x the minimal latency at a load close to 100%. In production use in many different clusters, Swift achieves consistently low tail completion times for short RPCs, while providing high throughput for long RPCs. It has loss rates that are at least 10x lower than a DCTCP protocol, and handles O(10k) incasts that sharply degrade with DCTCP. Gautam Kumar 0001, Nandita Dukkipati, Keon Jang, Hassan M. G. Wassel, Xian Wu 0001, Behnam Montazeri, Yaogong Wang, Kevin Springborn, Christopher Alfeld, Michael Ryan, David Wetherall, Amin Vahdat |
SIGCOMM | 6 |
| 2020 | 1RMA: Re-envisioning Remote Memory Access for Multi-tenant DatacentersabstractRemote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) plays a key role in supporting performance-hungry datacenter applications. However, existing RDMA technologies are ill-suited to multi-tenant datacenters, where applications run at massive scales, tenants require isolation and security, and the workload mix changes over time. Our experiences seeking to operationalize RDMA at scale indicate that these ills are rooted in standard RDMA's basic design attributes: connectionorientedness and complex policies baked into hardware. Arjun Singhvi, Aditya Akella, Dan Gibson, Thomas F. Wenisch, Monica Wong-Chan, Sean Clark 0003, Milo M. K. Martin, Moray McLaren, Prashant Chandra, Rob Cauble, Hassan M. G. Wassel, Behnam Montazeri, Simon L. Sabato, Joel Scherpelz, Amin Vahdat |
SIGCOMM | 12 |
| 2018 | Homa: a receiver-driven low-latency transport protocol using network prioritiesabstractHoma is a new transport protocol for datacenter networks. It provides exceptionally low latency, especially for workloads with a high volume of very short messages, and it also supports large messages and high network utilization. Homa uses in-network priority queues to ensure low latency for short messages; priority allocation is managed dynamically by each receiver and integrated with a receiver-driven flow control mechanism. Homa also uses controlled overcommitment of receiver downlinks to ensure efficient bandwidth utilization at high load. Our implementation of Homa delivers 99th percentile round-trip times less than 15 μs for short messages on a 10 Gbps network running at 80% load. These latencies are almost 100x lower than the best published measurements of an implementation. In simulations, Homa's latency is roughly equal to pFabric and significantly better than pHost, PIAS, and NDP for almost all message sizes and workloads. Homa can also sustain higher network loads than pFabric, pHost, or PIAS. Behnam Montazeri, Mohammad Alizadeh, John K. Ousterhout |
SIGCOMM | 1 |
| 2015 | The RAMCloud Storage SystemabstractRAMCloud is a storage system that provides low-latency access to large-scale datasets. To achieve low latency, RAMCloud stores all data in DRAM at all times. To support large capacities (1PB or more), it aggregates the memories of thousands of servers into a single coherent key-value store. RAMCloud ensures the durability of DRAM-based data by keeping backup copies on secondary storage. It uses a uniform log-structured mechanism to manage both DRAM and secondary storage, which results in high performance and efficient memory usage. RAMCloud uses a polling-based approach to communication, bypassing the kernel to communicate directly with NICs; with this approach, client applications can read small objects from any RAMCloud storage server in less than 5μs, durable writes of small objects take about 13.5μs. RAMCloud does not keep multiple copies of data online; instead, it provides high availability by recovering from crashes very quickly (1 to 2 seconds). RAMCloud’s crash recovery mechanism harnesses the resources of the entire cluster working concurrently so that recovery performance scales with cluster size. John K. Ousterhout, Arjun Gopalan, Ankita Kejriwal, Collin Lee, Behnam Montazeri, Diego Ongaro, Seo Jin Park, Henry Qin, Mendel Rosenblum, Stephen M. Rumble, Ryan Stutsman |
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. | 6 |