VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kenta Oono
dblp:168/8203
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Graph learning · 35% Learning theory · 23% Generative modeling · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
invertible neural network |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Universal Approximation Property of Invertible Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory › neural network approximation
universal approximation |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Universal Approximation Property of Invertible Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
posterior collapse |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Controlling Posterior Collapse by an Inverse Lipschitz Constraint on the Decoder Network · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Controlling Posterior Collapse by an Inverse Lipschitz Constraint on the Decoder Network · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
gradient boosting |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
multi-scale graph neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing mitigation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
transductive bound |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Approximation and non-parametric estimation of ResNet-type convolutional neural networks · ICML 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
approximation theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffeomorphism approximation · 0.9coupling flows · 0.9affine coupling · 0.9inverse lipschitz neural network · 0.7differential geometry · 0.7transductive learning theory · 0.4spectral analysis · 0.4rademacher complexity · 0.4gradient boosting · 0.4block-sparse FNNs · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Controlling Posterior Collapse by an Inverse Lipschitz Constraint on the Decoder NetworkabstractVariational autoencoders (VAEs) are one of the deep generative models that have experienced enormous success over the past decades. However, in practice, they suffer from a problem called posterior collapse, which occurs when the posterior distribution coincides, or collapses, with the prior taking no information from the latent structure of the input data into consideration. In this work, we introduce an inverse Lipschitz neural network into the decoder and, based on this architecture, provide a new method that can control in a simple and clear manner the degree of posterior collapse for a wide range of VAE models equipped with a concrete theoretical guarantee. We also illustrate the effectiveness of our method through several numerical experiments. Yuri Kinoshita, Kenta Oono, Kenji Fukumizu, Yuichi Yoshida, Shin-ichi Maeda |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Universal Approximation Property of Invertible Neural NetworksabstractInvertible neural networks (INNs) are neural network architectures with invertibility by design. Thanks to their invertibility and the tractability of their Jacobians, INNs have various machine learning applications such as probabilistic modeling, generative modeling, and representation learning. However, their attractive properties often come at the cost of restricting the layer design, which poses a question on their representation power: can we use these models to approximate sufficiently diverse functions? To answer this question, we have developed a general theoretical framework to investigate the representation power of INNs, building on a structure theorem of differential geometry. The framework simplifies the approximation problem of diffeomorphisms, which enables us to show the universal approximation properties of INNs. We apply the framework to two representative classes of INNs, namely Coupling-Flow-based INNs (CF-INNs) and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs), and elucidate their high representation power despite the restrictions on their architectures. Isao Ishikawa, Takeshi Teshima, Koichi Tojo, Kenta Oono, Masahiro Ikeda, Masashi Sugiyama |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2020 | Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification
Kenta Oono, Taiji Suzuki |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural NetworksabstractIt is known that the current graph neural networks (GNNs) are difficult to make themselves deep due to the problem known as over-smoothing. Multi-scale GNNs are a promising approach for mitigating the over-smoothing problem. However, there is little explanation of why it works empirically from the viewpoint of learning theory. In this study, we derive the optimization and generalization guarantees of transductive learning algorithms that include multi-scale GNNs. Using the boosting theory, we prove the convergence of the training error under weak learning-type conditions. By combining it with generalization gap bounds in terms of transductive Rademacher complexity, we show that a test error bound of a specific type of multi-scale GNNs that decreases corresponding to the number of node aggregations under some conditions. Our results offer theoretical explanations for the effectiveness of the multi-scale structure against the over-smoothing problem. We apply boosting algorithms to the training of multi-scale GNNs for real-world node prediction tasks. We confirm that its performance is comparable to existing GNNs, and the practical behaviors are consistent with theoretical observations. Code is available at https://github.com/delta2323/GB-GNN. Kenta Oono, Taiji Suzuki |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism ApproximatorsabstractInvertible neural networks based on coupling flows (CF-INNs) have various machine learning applications such as image synthesis and representation learning. However, their desirable characteristics such as analytic invertibility come at the cost of restricting the functional forms. This poses a question on their representation power: are CF-INNs universal approximators for invertible functions? Without a universality, there could be a well-behaved invertible transformation that the CF-INN can never approximate, hence it would render the model class unreliable. We answer this question by showing a convenient criterion: a CF-INN is universal if its layers contain affine coupling and invertible linear functions as special cases. As its corollary, we can affirmatively resolve a previously unsolved problem: whether normalizing flow models based on affine coupling can be universal distributional approximators. In the course of proving the universality, we prove a general theorem to show the equivalence of the universality for certain diffeomorphism classes, a theoretical insight that is of interest by itself. Takeshi Teshima, Isao Ishikawa, Koichi Tojo, Kenta Oono, Masahiro Ikeda, Masashi Sugiyama |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2019 | Approximation and non-parametric estimation of ResNet-type convolutional neural networksabstractConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been shown to achieve optimal approximation and estimation error rates (in minimax sense) in several function classes. However, previous analyzed optimal CNNs are unrealistically wide and difficult to obtain via optimization due to sparse constraints in important function classes, including the Hölder class. We show a ResNet-type CNN can attain the minimax optimal error rates in these classes in more plausible situations – it can be dense, and its width, channel size, and filter size are constant with respect to sample size. The key idea is that we can replicate the learning ability of Fully-connected neural networks (FNNs) by tailored CNNs, as long as the FNNs have block-sparse structures. Our theory is general in a sense that we can automatically translate any approximation rate achieved by block-sparse FNNs into that by CNNs. As an application, we derive approximation and estimation error rates of the aformentioned type of CNNs for the Barron and Hölder classes with the same strategy. Kenta Oono, Taiji Suzuki |
ICML | 1 |