Kenta Oono

dblp:168/8203 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Graph learning · 35% Learning theory · 23% Generative modeling · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
invertible neural network
1.122023
Universal Approximation Property of Invertible Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory › neural network approximation
universal approximation
1.122023
Universal Approximation Property of Invertible Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.922020
Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020
Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
posterior collapse
0.712023
Controlling Posterior Collapse by an Inverse Lipschitz Constraint on the Decoder Network · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.712023
Controlling Posterior Collapse by an Inverse Lipschitz Constraint on the Decoder Network · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power
0.412020
Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization analysis
0.412020
Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
gradient boosting
0.412020
Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
multi-scale graph neural network
0.412020
Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
0.412020
Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.412020
Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing
0.412020
Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing mitigation
0.412020
Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
transductive bound
0.412020
Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.412019
Approximation and non-parametric estimation of ResNet-type convolutional neural networks · ICML 2019
Mathematical optimization
approximation theory
0.112020
Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffeomorphism approximation · 0.9coupling flows · 0.9affine coupling · 0.9inverse lipschitz neural network · 0.7differential geometry · 0.7transductive learning theory · 0.4spectral analysis · 0.4rademacher complexity · 0.4gradient boosting · 0.4block-sparse FNNs · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Controlling Posterior Collapse by an Inverse Lipschitz Constraint on the Decoder Network
abstract
Variational autoencoders (VAEs) are one of the deep generative models that have experienced enormous success over the past decades. However, in practice, they suffer from a problem called posterior collapse, which occurs when the posterior distribution coincides, or collapses, with the prior taking no information from the latent structure of the input data into consideration. In this work, we introduce an inverse Lipschitz neural network into the decoder and, based on this architecture, provide a new method that can control in a simple and clear manner the degree of posterior collapse for a wide range of VAE models equipped with a concrete theoretical guarantee. We also illustrate the effectiveness of our method through several numerical experiments.
Yuri Kinoshita, Kenta Oono, Kenji Fukumizu, Yuichi Yoshida, Shin-ichi Maeda
ICML2
2023 Universal Approximation Property of Invertible Neural Networks
abstract
Invertible neural networks (INNs) are neural network architectures with invertibility by design. Thanks to their invertibility and the tractability of their Jacobians, INNs have various machine learning applications such as probabilistic modeling, generative modeling, and representation learning. However, their attractive properties often come at the cost of restricting the layer design, which poses a question on their representation power: can we use these models to approximate sufficiently diverse functions? To answer this question, we have developed a general theoretical framework to investigate the representation power of INNs, building on a structure theorem of differential geometry. The framework simplifies the approximation problem of diffeomorphisms, which enables us to show the universal approximation properties of INNs. We apply the framework to two representative classes of INNs, namely Coupling-Flow-based INNs (CF-INNs) and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs), and elucidate their high representation power despite the restrictions on their architectures.
Isao Ishikawa, Takeshi Teshima, Koichi Tojo, Kenta Oono, Masahiro Ikeda, Masashi Sugiyama
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2020 Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node Classification
Kenta Oono, Taiji Suzuki
ICLR1
2020 Optimization and Generalization Analysis of Transduction through Gradient Boosting and Application to Multi-scale Graph Neural Networks
abstract
It is known that the current graph neural networks (GNNs) are difficult to make themselves deep due to the problem known as over-smoothing. Multi-scale GNNs are a promising approach for mitigating the over-smoothing problem. However, there is little explanation of why it works empirically from the viewpoint of learning theory. In this study, we derive the optimization and generalization guarantees of transductive learning algorithms that include multi-scale GNNs. Using the boosting theory, we prove the convergence of the training error under weak learning-type conditions. By combining it with generalization gap bounds in terms of transductive Rademacher complexity, we show that a test error bound of a specific type of multi-scale GNNs that decreases corresponding to the number of node aggregations under some conditions. Our results offer theoretical explanations for the effectiveness of the multi-scale structure against the over-smoothing problem. We apply boosting algorithms to the training of multi-scale GNNs for real-world node prediction tasks. We confirm that its performance is comparable to existing GNNs, and the practical behaviors are consistent with theoretical observations. Code is available at https://github.com/delta2323/GB-GNN.
Kenta Oono, Taiji Suzuki
NeurIPS1
2020 Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators
abstract
Invertible neural networks based on coupling flows (CF-INNs) have various machine learning applications such as image synthesis and representation learning. However, their desirable characteristics such as analytic invertibility come at the cost of restricting the functional forms. This poses a question on their representation power: are CF-INNs universal approximators for invertible functions? Without a universality, there could be a well-behaved invertible transformation that the CF-INN can never approximate, hence it would render the model class unreliable. We answer this question by showing a convenient criterion: a CF-INN is universal if its layers contain affine coupling and invertible linear functions as special cases. As its corollary, we can affirmatively resolve a previously unsolved problem: whether normalizing flow models based on affine coupling can be universal distributional approximators. In the course of proving the universality, we prove a general theorem to show the equivalence of the universality for certain diffeomorphism classes, a theoretical insight that is of interest by itself.
Takeshi Teshima, Isao Ishikawa, Koichi Tojo, Kenta Oono, Masahiro Ikeda, Masashi Sugiyama
NeurIPS4
2019 Approximation and non-parametric estimation of ResNet-type convolutional neural networks
abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been shown to achieve optimal approximation and estimation error rates (in minimax sense) in several function classes. However, previous analyzed optimal CNNs are unrealistically wide and difficult to obtain via optimization due to sparse constraints in important function classes, including the Hölder class. We show a ResNet-type CNN can attain the minimax optimal error rates in these classes in more plausible situations – it can be dense, and its width, channel size, and filter size are constant with respect to sample size. The key idea is that we can replicate the learning ability of Fully-connected neural networks (FNNs) by tailored CNNs, as long as the FNNs have block-sparse structures. Our theory is general in a sense that we can automatically translate any approximation rate achieved by block-sparse FNNs into that by CNNs. As an application, we derive approximation and estimation error rates of the aformentioned type of CNNs for the Barron and Hölder classes with the same strategy.
Kenta Oono, Taiji Suzuki
ICML1