Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Jack
dblp:168/8631
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
dense SLAM |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative design space exploration of dense and semi-dense SLAM · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative design space exploration of dense and semi-dense SLAM · ICRA 2016 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative design space exploration of dense and semi-dense SLAM · ICRA 2016 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
SLAM benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative design space exploration of dense and semi-dense SLAM · ICRA 2016 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative design space exploration of dense and semi-dense SLAM · ICRA 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kernel-level profiling · 0.5design space exploration · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Comparative design space exploration of dense and semi-dense SLAMabstractSLAM has matured significantly over the past few years, and is beginning to appear in serious commercial products. While new SLAM systems are being proposed at every conference, evaluation is often restricted to qualitative visualizations or accuracy estimation against a ground truth. This is due to the lack of benchmarking methodologies which can holistically and quantitatively evaluate these systems. Further investigation at the level of individual kernels and parameter spaces of SLAM pipelines is non-existent, which is absolutely essential for systems research and integration. We extend the recently introduced SLAMBench framework to allow comparing two state-of-the-art SLAM pipelines, namely KinectFusion and LSD-SLAM, along the metrics of accuracy, energy consumption, and processing frame rate on two different hardware platforms, namely a desktop and an embedded device. We also analyze the pipelines at the level of individual kernels and explore their algorithmic and hardware design spaces for the first time, yielding valuable insights. M. Zeeshan Zia, Luigi Nardi, Andrew Jack, Emanuele Vespa, Bruno Bodin, Paul H. J. Kelly, Andrew J. Davison |
ICRA | 3 |