Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ryan Roelke
dblp:168/8962
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Distributed systems · 76% Performance modeling and evaluation · 24% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network management and operations · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › observability › distributed monitoring
causal monitoring |
0.8 | 3 | 2017 | Pivot Tracing: Dynamic Causal Monitoring for Distributed Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2017 Pivot Tracing: Dynamic Causal Monitoring for Distributed Systems · USENIX ATC 2016 Pivot tracing: dynamic causal monitoring for distributed systems · SOSP 2015 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › program instrumentation
dynamic instrumentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Pivot Tracing: Dynamic Causal Monitoring for Distributed Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2017 |
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Pivot tracing: dynamic causal monitoring for distributed systems · SOSP 2015 |
Network management and operations › fault management › fault diagnosis
root cause analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Pivot tracing: dynamic causal monitoring for distributed systems · SOSP 2015 |
Distributed systems › root cause analysis
root cause localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Pivot Tracing: Dynamic Causal Monitoring for Distributed Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic instrumentation · 0.7happened-before join · 0.4relational operator · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Pivot Tracing: Dynamic Causal Monitoring for Distributed SystemsabstractMonitoring and troubleshooting distributed systems is notoriously difficult; potential problems are complex, varied, and unpredictable. The monitoring and diagnosis tools commonly used today—logs, counters, and metrics—have two important limitations: what gets recorded is defined a priori , and the information is recorded in a component- or machine-centric way, making it extremely hard to correlate events that cross these boundaries. This article presents Pivot Tracing, a monitoring framework for distributed systems that addresses both limitations by combining dynamic instrumentation with a novel relational operator: the happened-before join. Pivot Tracing gives users, at runtime, the ability to define arbitrary metrics at one point of the system, while being able to select, filter, and group by events meaningful at other parts of the system, even when crossing component or machine boundaries. We have implemented a prototype of Pivot Tracing for Java-based systems and evaluate it on a heterogeneous Hadoop cluster comprising HDFS, HBase, MapReduce, and YARN. We show that Pivot Tracing can effectively identify a diverse range of root causes such as software bugs, misconfiguration, and limping hardware. We show that Pivot Tracing is dynamic, extensible, and enables cross-tier analysis between inter-operating applications, with low execution overhead. Jonathan Mace, Ryan Roelke, Rodrigo Fonseca |
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. | 2 |
| 2016 | Pivot Tracing: Dynamic Causal Monitoring for Distributed Systems
Jonathan Mace, Ryan Roelke, Rodrigo Fonseca |
USENIX ATC | 2 |
| 2015 | Pivot tracing: dynamic causal monitoring for distributed systemsabstractMonitoring and troubleshooting distributed systems is notoriously difficult; potential problems are complex, varied, and unpredictable. The monitoring and diagnosis tools commonly used today -- logs, counters, and metrics -- have two important limitations: what gets recorded is defined a priori, and the information is recorded in a component- or machine-centric way, making it extremely hard to correlate events that cross these boundaries. This paper presents Pivot Tracing, a monitoring framework for distributed systems that addresses both limitations by combining dynamic instrumentation with a novel relational operator: the happened-before join. Pivot Tracing gives users, at runtime, the ability to define arbitrary metrics at one point of the system, while being able to select, filter, and group by events meaningful at other parts of the system, even when crossing component or machine boundaries. We have implemented a prototype of Pivot Tracing for Java-based systems and evaluate it on a heterogeneous Hadoop cluster comprising HDFS, HBase, MapReduce, and YARN. We show that Pivot Tracing can effectively identify a diverse range of root causes such as software bugs, misconfiguration, and limping hardware. We show that Pivot Tracing is dynamic, extensible, and enables cross-tier analysis between inter-operating applications, with low execution overhead. Jonathan Mace, Ryan Roelke, Rodrigo Fonseca |
SOSP | 2 |