Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandre J. Fonseca

dblp:168/8975 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 56% Distributed systems · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › pattern mining › graph pattern mining
frequent subgraph mining
0.212015
Arabesque: a system for distributed graph mining · SOSP 2015
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.212015
Arabesque: a system for distributed graph mining · SOSP 2015
Distributed systems
distributed data processing
0.212015
Arabesque: a system for distributed graph mining · SOSP 2015
High-performance computing › large-scale graph processing
distributed graph mining
0.212015
Arabesque: a system for distributed graph mining · SOSP 2015
High-performance computing
large-scale graph processing
0.112015
Arabesque: a system for distributed graph mining · SOSP 2015
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Arabesque: a system for distributed graph mining
abstract
Distributed data processing platforms such as MapReduce and Pregel have substantially simplified the design and deployment of certain classes of distributed graph analytics algorithms. However, these platforms do not represent a good match for distributed graph mining problems, as for example finding frequent subgraphs in a graph. Given an input graph, these problems require exploring a very large number of subgraphs and finding patterns that match some "interestingness" criteria desired by the user. These algorithms are very important for areas such as social networks, semantic web, and bioinformatics.
Carlos H. C. Teixeira, Alexandre J. Fonseca, Marco Serafini, Georgos Siganos, Mohammed J. Zaki, Ashraf Aboulnaga
SOSP2