Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathanael Cheriere

dblp:169/1142 · also Nathanaël Cheriere · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-5661-0007ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 46% Cloud and datacenter computing · 23% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage
0.912025
Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025
Storage systems › optical storage
holographic memory
0.912025
Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
spatial multiplexing
0.912025
Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025
Storage systems › storage device technology
storage density
0.912025
Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025
Energy-efficient computing
storage energy efficiency
0.312025
Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges · ACM Trans. Storage 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workload-driven optimization · 0.9physics modeling · 0.9machine learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Good things come in small packages: Should we build AI clusters with Lite-GPUs?
abstract
To match the blooming demand of generative AI workloads, GPU designers have so far been trying to pack more and more compute and memory into single complex and expensive packages. However, there is growing uncertainty about the scalability of individual GPUs and thus AI clusters, as state-of-the-art GPUs are already displaying packaging, yield, and cooling limitations. We propose to rethink the design and scaling of AI clusters through efficiently-connected large clusters of Lite-GPUs, GPUs with single, small dies and a fraction of the capabilities of larger GPUs. We think recent advances in co-packaged optics can enable distributing AI workloads onto many Lite-GPUs through high bandwidth and efficient communication. In this paper, we present the key benefits of Lite-GPUs on manufacturing cost, blast radius, yield, and power efficiency; and discuss systems opportunities and challenges around resource, workload, memory, and network management.
Burcu Canakci, Xingbo Wu, Nathanael Cheriere, Paolo Costa, Sergey Legtchenko, Dushyanth Narayanan, Antony I. T. Rowstron
HotOS4
2025 Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges
abstract
Holographic Storage is an old idea that has always promised high density and fast random access, but has never been commercially competitive with Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) and Solid State Devices (SSDs). In Project HSD at Microsoft Research we asked the question: “Does holographic storage finally make sense for cloud storage?” This article describes our journey toward answering this question. We achieved 1.8× higher density than the previous state-of-the-art, using commodity components available today and leveraging machine learning to compensate for the noise and distortions introduced by commodity components. This uncovered two new challenges which are the focus of this article: achieving high end-to-end energy efficiency without sacrificing capacity, and spatial multiplexing without mechanical movement. Improving end-to-end energy efficiency requires joint optimization across low-level media parameters and higher-level system parameters that govern background maintenance operations such as read refresh and garbage collection. We developed new physics models of the media; analytic and simulation models of the media access and background media maintenance; and workload-driven optimization to find optimal parameter combinations. These techniques resulted in a 14× improvement over the previous approach for typical workloads without sacrificing capacity. We also designed the first scalable and mechanical movement free spatial multiplexing system for holographic storage. Despite these advances, we conclude that currently, holographic storage is still far from the combination of density, capacity scaling, and energy efficiency needed to compete with the incumbent technologies. We need fundamental advances in the physical media that improve energy efficiency by another 1–2 orders of magnitude without reducing data density. Further advances in optics are also required to achieve spatial multiplexing that is simultaneously scalable, low-loss, and high-density.
Nathanael Cheriere, Jiaqi Chu, Grace Brennan, Pashmina Cameron, Pedro Da Costa, Jannes Gladrow, Guilherme Ilunga, Douglas J. Kelly, Joowon Lim, Giorgio Maltese, Tony Mason, Greg O'Shea, Soujanya Ponnapalli, Michael Rudow, Alan Sanders, Theano Stavrinos, Xingbo Wu, Mengyang Yang, Dushyanth Narayanan, Benn C. Thomsen, Antony I. T. Rowstron
ACM Trans. Storage1
2020 Pufferscale: Rescaling HPC Data Services for High Energy Physics Applications
abstract
User-space HPC data services are emerging as an appealing alternative to traditional parallel file systems, because of their ability to be tailored to application needs while eliminating unnecessary overheads incurred by POSIX compliance. The High Energy Physics (HEP) community is progressively turning towards such services to enable high-throughput accesses under heavy concurrency to billions of event data produced by instruments and consumed by subsequent analysis workflows. Such services would benefit from the possibility to be rescaled up and down to adapt to changing workloads, as experimental campaigns progress , in order to optimize resource usage. This paper formalizes rescaling a distributed storage system as a multi objective optimization problem considering three criteria: load balance, data balance, and duration of the rescaling operation. We propose a heuristic for rapidly finding a good approximate solution, while allowing users to weight the criteria as needed. The heuristic is evaluated with Pufferscale, a new rescaling manager for microservice-based distributed storage systems. To validate our approach in a real-world ecosystem, we showcase the use of Pufferscale as a means to enable storage malleability in the HEPnOS storage system for HEP applications.
Nathanael Cheriere, Matthieu Dorier, Gabriel Antoniu, Stefan M. Wild, Sven Leyffer, Robert B. Ross
CCGRID1
2020 How fast can one resize a distributed file system?
Nathanael Cheriere, Matthieu Dorier, Gabriel Antoniu
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.1
2019 Is it Worth Relaxing Fault Tolerance to Speed Up Decommission in Distributed Storage Systems?
abstract
Efficient resource utilization is a major concern for large-scale computer platforms. One method used to lower energy consumption and operational cost is to reduce the amount of idle resources. This can be achieved by using malleability, namely, the possibility for resource managers to dynamically increase or decrease the amount of resources of jobs while they are running. Decommissioning (i.e., removing from the cluster) the idle nodes as soon as possible allows the resource manager to quickly reallocate those nodes to other jobs. Challenges appear when such nodes host part of a distributed storage system. Such storage systems may need to transfer large amounts of data before releasing the nodes, in order to ensure data availability and a certain level of fault tolerance. In this paper, we model and evaluate the performance of the decommission operation when relaxing the level of fault tolerance (i.e., the number of replicas) during this operation. Intuitively, this is expected to reduce the amount of data transfers needed before nodes are released, and thus allow nodes to be returned to the resource manager faster. We quantify theoretically how much time and resources are saved by such a fast decommission strategy compared with a standard decommission that does not temporarily reduce the fault-tolerance level. We establish lower bounds for the duration of the different phases of a fast decommission. We use the lower bounds to estimate when fast decommission would be useful to reduce the usage of core-hours and when not. We implement a prototype for fast decommission and experimentally validate the lower bounds on the duration of the operation and confirm in practice our theoretical findings.
Nathanael Cheriere, Matthieu Dorier, Gabriel Antoniu
CCGRID1
2017 How fast can one scale down a distributed file system?
abstract
For efficient Big Data processing, efficient resource utilization becomes a major concern as large-scale computing infrastructures such as supercomputers or clouds keep growing in size. Naturally, energy and cost savings can be obtained by reducing idle resources. Malleability, which is the possibility for resource managers to dynamically increase or reduce the resources of jobs, appears as a promising means to progress towards this goal. However, state-of-the-art parallel and distributed file systems have not been designed with malleability in mind. This is mainly due to the supposedly high cost of storage decommission, which is considered to involve expensive data transfers. Nevertheless, as network and storage technologies evolve, old assumptions on potential bottlenecks can be revisited. In this study, we evaluate the viability of malleability as a design principle for a distributed file system. We specifically model the duration of the decommission operation, for which we obtain a theoretical lower bound. Then we consider HDFS as a use case and we show that our model can explain the measured decommission times. The existing decommission mechanism of HDFS is good when the network is the bottleneck, but could be accelerated by up to a factor 3 when the storage is the limiting factor. With the highlights provided by our model, we suggest improvements to speed up decommission in HDFS and we discuss open perspectives for the design of efficient malleable distributed file systems.
Nathanael Cheriere, Gabriel Antoniu
IEEE BigData1
2017 Understanding Rack-Scale Disaggregated Storage
Sergey Legtchenko, Hugh Williams, Kaveh Razavi, Austin Donnelly, Richard Black, Andrew Douglas, Nathanael Cheriere, Daniel Fryer, Kai Mast, Angela Demke Brown, Ana Klimovic, Andy Slowey, Antony I. T. Rowstron
HotStorage7