Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siegfried Depner

dblp:169/1734 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 77% High-performance computing · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management
distributed graph processing
0.212015
PGX.D: a fast distributed graph processing engine · SC 2015
Distributed systems › distributed graph processing
distributed graph processing engine
0.212015
PGX.D: a fast distributed graph processing engine · SC 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ghost nodes · 0.4edge partitioning · 0.4cooperative context switching · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 PGX.D: a fast distributed graph processing engine
abstract
Graph analysis is a powerful method in data analysis. Although several frameworks have been proposed for processing large graph instances in distributed environments, their performance is much lower than using efficient single-machine implementations provided with enough memory. In this paper, we present a fast distributed graph processing system, namely PGX.D. We show that PGX.D outperforms other distributed graph systems like GraphLab significantly (3x -- 90x). Furthermore, PGX.D on 4 to 16 machines is also faster than an implementation optimized for single-machine execution. Using a fast cooperative context-switching mechanism, we implement PGX.D as a low-overhead, bandwidth-efficient communication framework that supports remote data-pulling patterns. Moreover, PGX.D achieves large traffic reduction and good workload balance by applying selective ghost nodes, edge partitioning, and edge chunking transparently to the user. Our analysis confirms that each of these features is indeed crucial for overall performance of certain kinds of graph algorithms. Finally, we advocate the use of balanced beefy clusters where the sustained random DRAM-access bandwidth in aggregate is matched with the bandwidth of the underlying interconnection fabric.
Sungpack Hong, Siegfried Depner, Thomas Manhardt, Jan Van Der Lugt, Merijn Verstraaten, Hassan Chafi
SC2