In this paper we introduce LDBC Graphalytics, a new industrial-grade benchmark for graph analysis platforms. It consists of six deterministic algorithms, standard datasets, synthetic dataset generators, and reference output, that enable the objective comparison of graph analysis platforms. Its test harness produces deep metrics that quantify multiple kinds of system scalability, such as horizontal/vertical and weak/strong, and of robustness, such as failures and performance variability. The benchmark comes with open-source software for generating data and monitoring performance. We describe and analyze six implementations of the benchmark (three from the community, three from the industry), providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the platforms. Key to our contribution, vendors perform the tuning and benchmarking of their platforms.

Graph analysis is a powerful method in data analysis. Although several frameworks have been proposed for processing large graph instances in distributed environments, their performance is much lower than using efficient single-machine implementations provided with enough memory. In this paper, we present a fast distributed graph processing system, namely PGX.D. We show that PGX.D outperforms other distributed graph systems like GraphLab significantly (3x -- 90x). Furthermore, PGX.D on 4 to 16 machines is also faster than an implementation optimized for single-machine execution. Using a fast cooperative context-switching mechanism, we implement PGX.D as a low-overhead, bandwidth-efficient communication framework that supports remote data-pulling patterns. Moreover, PGX.D achieves large traffic reduction and good workload balance by applying selective ghost nodes, edge partitioning, and edge chunking transparently to the user. Our analysis confirms that each of these features is indeed crucial for overall performance of certain kinds of graph algorithms. Finally, we advocate the use of balanced beefy clusters where the sustained random DRAM-access bandwidth in aggregate is matched with the bandwidth of the underlying interconnection fabric.