Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher Knight 0001
dblp:169/1753 · also Chris Knight 0001
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-8432-0658ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
High-performance computing · 52% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 16% Cloud and datacenter computing · 12% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.8 | 3 | 2018 | Topology-aware space-shared co-analysis of large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2018 Optimal execution of co-analysis for large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2016 Optimal scheduling of in-situ analysis for large-scale scientific simulations · SC 2015 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
molecular dynamics simulation |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Topology-aware space-shared co-analysis of large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2018 Optimal execution of co-analysis for large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Optimal execution of co-analysis for large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2016 Optimal scheduling of in-situ analysis for large-scale scientific simulations · SC 2015 |
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › scheduling
resource-constrained scheduling |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Optimal execution of co-analysis for large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2016 Optimal scheduling of in-situ analysis for large-scale scientific simulations · SC 2015 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
resource management and scheduling |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Optimal execution of co-analysis for large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2016 Optimal scheduling of in-situ analysis for large-scale scientific simulations · SC 2015 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
network topology |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Topology-aware space-shared co-analysis of large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2018 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Topology-aware space-shared co-analysis of large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2018 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network topology
topology-aware mapping |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Topology-aware space-shared co-analysis of large-scale molecular dynamics simulations · SC 2018 |
High-performance computing › scientific data analysis
in-situ analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Optimal scheduling of in-situ analysis for large-scale scientific simulations · SC 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
co-analysis scheduling · 0.3mathematical optimization · 0.2data transfer frequency optimization · 0.2numerical optimization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Rendezvous algorithms for large-scale modeling and simulation
Steven J. Plimpton, Christopher Knight 0001 |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 2 |
| 2018 | Topology-aware space-shared co-analysis of large-scale molecular dynamics simulations
Preeti Malakar, Todd S. Munson, Christopher Knight 0001, Venkatram Vishwanath, Michael E. Papka |
SC | 3 |
| 2016 | Optimal execution of co-analysis for large-scale molecular dynamics simulationsabstractThe analysis of scientific simulation data enables scientists to derive insights from their simulations. This analysis of the simulation output can be performed at the same execution site as the simulation using the same resources or can be done at a different site. The optimal output frequency is challenging to decide and is often chosen empirically. We propose a mathematical formulation for choosing the optimal frequency of data transfer for analysis and the feasibility of performing the analysis, under the given resource constraints such as network bandwidth, disk space, available memory, and computation time. We propose formulations for two cases of co-analysis - local and remote. We consider various analyses features such as computation time, input data and memory requirement, importance of the analysis and minimum frequency required for performing the analysis. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using molecular dynamics applications on the Mira and Edison supercomputers. Preeti Malakar, Venkatram Vishwanath, Christopher Knight 0001, Todd S. Munson, Michael E. Papka |
SC | 3 |
| 2015 | Optimal scheduling of in-situ analysis for large-scale scientific simulationsabstractToday's leadership computing facilities have enabled the execution of transformative simulations at unprecedented scales. However, analyzing the huge amount of output from these simulations remains a challenge. Most analyses of this output is performed in post-processing mode at the end of the simulation. The time to read the output for the analysis can be significantly high due to poor I/O bandwidth, which increases the end-to-end simulation-analysis time. Simulation-time analysis can reduce this end-to-end time. In this work, we present the scheduling of in-situ analysis as a numerical optimization problem to maximize the number of online analyses subject to resource constraints such as I/O bandwidth, network bandwidth, rate of computation and available memory. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through two application case studies on the IBM Blue Gene/Q system. Preeti Malakar, Venkatram Vishwanath, Todd S. Munson, Christopher Knight 0001, Mark Hereld, Sven Leyffer, Michael E. Papka |
SC | 4 |
| 2005 | Semi-Structured Data Management in the Enterprise: A Nimble, High-Throughput, and Scalable ApproachabstractIn this paper we describe an approach and system for managing enterprise semi-structured data that is high-throughput, nimble, and scalable. We present the NETMARK system, which provides for a "schemaless" way of managing semi-structured documents. We describe in particular detail the unique underlying data storage approach and efficient query processing mechanisms given this storage system. We present an extensive benchmark evaluation of the NETMARK system and also compare it with related XML management systems. At the heart of the approach is the philosophy of a focus on most common data management requirements in the enterprise, and not burdening users and application developers with unnecessary complexity and formal schemas. David A. Maluf, David G. Bell, Naveen Ashish, Christopher Knight 0001, Peter B. Tran |
IDEAS | 4 |