Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Aseel Awdeh

dblp:169/3373 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0578-090XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud workflow
0.912025
Warp analysis research pipelines: cloud-optimized workflows for biological data processing and reproducible analysis · Bioinform. 2025
Cloud and datacenter computing
reproducible analysis pipeline
0.912025
Warp analysis research pipelines: cloud-optimized workflows for biological data processing and reproducible analysis · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
ChIP-seq analysis
0.412019
RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › ChIP-seq analysis
peak calling
0.412019
RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workflow management · 1.7docker · 1.7resampling · 0.4false discovery rate estimation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Warp analysis research pipelines: cloud-optimized workflows for biological data processing and reproducible analysis
abstract
SUMMARY: In the era of large data, the cloud is increasingly used as a computing environment, necessitating the development of cloud-compatible pipelines that can provide uniform analysis across disparate biological datasets. The Warp Analysis Research Pipelines (WARP) repository is a GitHub repository of open-source, cloud-optimized workflows for biological data processing that are semantically versioned, tested, and documented. A companion repository, WARP-Tools, hosts Docker containers and custom tools used in WARP workflows. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The WARP and WARP-Tools repositories and code are freely available at https://github.com/broadinstitute/WARP and https://github.com/broadinstitute/WARP-tools, respectively. The pipelines are available for download from the WARP repository, can be exported from Dockstore, and can be imported to a bioinformatics platform such as Terra.
Kylee Degatano, Aseel Awdeh, Robert Sidney Cox III, Wes Dingman, George Grant, Farzaneh Khajouei, Elizabeth Kiernan, Kishori M. Konwar, Kaylee L. Mathews, Kevin Palis, Nikelle Petrillo, Geraldine Van der Auwera, Chengchen (Rex) Wang, Jessica Way
Bioinform.2
2021 WACS: improving ChIP-seq peak calling by optimally weighting controls
abstract
BACKGROUND: Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), initially introduced more than a decade ago, is widely used by the scientific community to detect protein/DNA binding and histone modifications across the genome. Every experiment is prone to noise and bias, and ChIP-seq experiments are no exception. To alleviate bias, the incorporation of control datasets in ChIP-seq analysis is an essential step. The controls are used to account for the background signal, while the remainder of the ChIP-seq signal captures true binding or histone modification. However, a recurrent issue is different types of bias in different ChIP-seq experiments. Depending on which controls are used, different aspects of ChIP-seq bias are better or worse accounted for, and peak calling can produce different results for the same ChIP-seq experiment. Consequently, generating "smart" controls, which model the non-signal effect for a specific ChIP-seq experiment, could enhance contrast and increase the reliability and reproducibility of the results. RESULT: We propose a peak calling algorithm, Weighted Analysis of ChIP-seq (WACS), which is an extension of the well-known peak caller MACS2. There are two main steps in WACS: First, weights are estimated for each control using non-negative least squares regression. The goal is to customize controls to model the noise distribution for each ChIP-seq experiment. This is then followed by peak calling. We demonstrate that WACS significantly outperforms MACS2 and AIControl, another recent algorithm for generating smart controls, in the detection of enriched regions along the genome, in terms of motif enrichment and reproducibility analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This ultimately improves our understanding of ChIP-seq controls and their biases, and shows that WACS results in a better approximation of the noise distribution in controls.
Aseel Awdeh, Marcel Turcotte, Theodore J. Perkins
BMC Bioinform.1
2019 RECAP reveals the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls
abstract
MOTIVATION: Chromatin Immunopreciptation (ChIP)-seq is used extensively to identify sites of transcription factor binding or regions of epigenetic modifications to the genome. A key step in ChIP-seq analysis is peak calling, where genomic regions enriched for ChIP versus control reads are identified. Many programs have been designed to solve this task, but nearly all fall into the statistical trap of using the data twice-once to determine candidate enriched regions, and again to assess enrichment by classical statistical hypothesis testing. This double use of the data invalidates the statistical significance assigned to enriched regions, thus the true significance or reliability of peak calls remains unknown. RESULTS: Using simulated and real ChIP-seq data, we show that three well-known peak callers, MACS, SICER and diffReps, output biased P-values and false discovery rate estimates that can be many orders of magnitude too optimistic. We propose a wrapper algorithm, RECAP, that uses resampling of ChIP-seq and control data to estimate a monotone transform correcting for biases built into peak calling algorithms. When applied to null hypothesis data, where there is no enrichment between ChIP-seq and control, P-values recalibrated by RECAP are approximately uniformly distributed. On data where there is genuine enrichment, RECAP P-values give a better estimate of the true statistical significance of candidate peaks and better false discovery rate estimates, which correlate better with empirical reproducibility. RECAP is a powerful new tool for assessing the true statistical significance of ChIP-seq peak calls. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The RECAP software is available through www.perkinslab.ca or on github at https://github.com/theodorejperkins/RECAP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Justin G. Chitpin, Aseel Awdeh, Theodore J. Perkins
Bioinform.2
2018 Dynamics in Epistasis Analysis
abstract
Finding regulatory relationships between genes, including the direction and nature of influence between them, is a fundamental challenge in the field of molecular genetics. One classical approach to this problem is epistasis analysis. Broadly speaking, epistasis analysis infers the regulatory relationships between a pair of genes in a genetic pathway by considering the patterns of change in an observable trait resulting from single and double deletion of genes. While classical epistasis analysis has yielded deep insights on numerous genetic pathways, it is not without limitations. Here, we explore the possibility of dynamic epistasis analysis, in which, in addition to performing genetic perturbations of a pathway, we drive the pathway by a time-varying upstream signal. We explore the theoretical power of dynamical epistasis analysis by conducting an identifiability analysis of Boolean models of genetic pathways, comparing static and dynamic approaches. We find that even relatively simple input dynamics greatly increases the power of epistasis analysis to discriminate alternative network structures. Further, we explore the question of experiment design, and show that a subset of short time-varying signals, which we call dynamic primitives, allow maximum discriminative power with a reduced number of experiments.
Aseel Awdeh, Hilary Phenix, Mads Kærn, Theodore J. Perkins
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.1