Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thijs Vogels
dblp:169/7392
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
7as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5884-4842ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 59% Optimization for machine learning · 29% Vision and language · 5% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Rendering · 54% Image and video processing · 46% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization |
2.4 | 4 | 2024 | LASER: Linear Compression in Wireless Distributed Optimization · ICML 2024 Beyond Spectral Gap: The Role of the Topology in Decentralized Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Beyond spectral gap: the role of the topology in decentralized learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
2.3 | 4 | 2024 | LASER: Linear Compression in Wireless Distributed Optimization · ICML 2024 Beyond spectral gap: the role of the topology in decentralized learning · NeurIPS 2022 RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training |
1.3 | 3 | 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021 Practical Low-Rank Communication Compression in Decentralized Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2020 PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
decentralized learning |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021 Practical Low-Rank Communication Compression in Decentralized Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
gradient compression |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Practical Low-Rank Communication Compression in Decentralized Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2020 PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
low-rank approximation |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Practical Low-Rank Communication Compression in Decentralized Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2020 PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient distributed SGD |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LASER: Linear Compression in Wireless Distributed Optimization · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MultiMoDN - Multimodal, Multi-Task, Interpretable Modular Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal fusion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MultiMoDN - Multimodal, Multi-Task, Interpretable Modular Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
network topology effects |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Spectral Gap: The Role of the Topology in Decentralized Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Rendering
monte carlo rendering |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Denoising with kernel prediction and asymmetric loss functions · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 Kernel-predicting convolutional networks for denoising Monte Carlo renderings · ACM Trans. Graph. 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Beyond spectral gap: the role of the topology in decentralized learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › distributed optimization
decentralized SGD |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Beyond spectral gap: the role of the topology in decentralized learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimizer benchmarking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimizer Benchmarking Needs to Account for Hyperparameter Tuning · ICML 2020 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Denoising with kernel prediction and asymmetric loss functions · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
denoising |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Kernel-predicting convolutional networks for denoising Monte Carlo renderings · ACM Trans. Graph. 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | MultiMoDN - Multimodal, Multi-Task, Interpretable Modular Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Spectral Gap: The Role of the Topology in Decentralized Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Rendering › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Denoising with kernel prediction and asymmetric loss functions · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Kernel-predicting convolutional networks for denoising Monte Carlo renderings · ACM Trans. Graph. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral gap analysis · 1.9convex optimization · 1.3power iteration · 0.8low-rank gradient compression · 0.8linear compression · 0.8sequential fusion · 0.7modular network · 0.7kernel prediction · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6convex optimization theory · 0.6relaysum · 0.5RelaySGD · 0.5asymmetric loss · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | LASER: Linear Compression in Wireless Distributed OptimizationabstractData-parallel SGD is the de facto algorithm for distributed optimization, especially for large scale machine learning. Despite its merits, communication bottleneck is one of its persistent issues. Most compression schemes to alleviate this either assume noiseless communication links, or fail to achieve good performance on practical tasks. In this paper, we close this gap and introduce **LASER**: **L**ine**A**r Compre**S**sion in Wir**E**less Dist**R**ibuted Optimization. LASER capitalizes on the inherent low-rank structure of gradients and transmits them efficiently over the noisy channels. Whilst enjoying theoretical guarantees similar to those of the classical SGD, LASER shows consistent gains over baselines on a variety of practical benchmarks. In particular, it outperforms the state-of-the-art compression schemes on challenging computer vision and GPT language modeling tasks. On the latter, we obtain 50-64% improvement in perplexity over our baselines for noisy channels. Ashok Vardhan Makkuva, Marco Bondaschi, Thijs Vogels, Martin Jaggi, Hyeji Kim, Michael Gastpar |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | MultiMoDN - Multimodal, Multi-Task, Interpretable Modular NetworksabstractPredicting multiple real-world tasks in a single model often requires a particularly diverse feature space. Multimodal (MM) models aim to extract the synergistic predictive potential of multiple data types to create a shared feature space with aligned semantic meaning across inputs of drastically varying sizes (i.e. images, text, sound). Most current MM architectures fuse these representations in parallel, which not only limits their interpretability but also creates a dependency on modality availability. We present MultiModN, a multimodal, modular network that fuses latent representations in a sequence of any number, combination, or type of modality while providing granular real-time predictive feedback on any number or combination of predictive tasks. MultiModN's composable pipeline is interpretable-by-design, as well as innately multi-task and robust to the fundamental issue of biased missingness. We perform four experiments on several benchmark MM datasets across 10 real-world tasks (predicting medical diagnoses, academic performance, and weather), and show that MultiModN's sequential MM fusion does not compromise performance compared with a baseline of parallel fusion. By simulating the challenging bias of missing not-at-random (MNAR), this work shows that, contrary to MultiModN, parallel fusion baselines erroneously learn MNAR and suffer catastrophic failure when faced with different patterns of MNAR at inference. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first inherently MNAR-resistant approach to MM modeling. In conclusion, MultiModN provides granular insights, robustness, and flexibility without compromising performance. Vinitra Swamy, Malika Satayeva, Jibril Frej, Thierry Bossy, Thijs Vogels, Martin Jaggi, Tanja Käser, Mary-Anne Hartley |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Beyond Spectral Gap: The Role of the Topology in Decentralized LearningabstractIn data-parallel optimization of machine learning models, workers collaborate to improve their estimates of the model: more accurate gradients allow them to use larger learning rates and optimize faster. In the decentralized setting, in which workers communicate over a sparse graph, current theory fails to capture important aspects of real-world behavior. First, the `spectral gap' of the communication graph is not predictive of its empirical performance in (deep) learning. Second, current theory does not explain that collaboration enables larger learning rates than training alone. In fact, it prescribes smaller learning rates, which further decrease as graphs become larger, failing to explain convergence dynamics in infinite graphs. This paper aims to paint an accurate picture of sparsely-connected distributed optimization. We quantify how the graph topology influences convergence in a quadratic toy problem and provide theoretical results for general smooth and (strongly) convex objectives. Our theory matches empirical observations in deep learning, and accurately describes the relative merits of different graph topologies. Thijs Vogels, Hadrien Hendrikx, Martin Jaggi |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | Beyond spectral gap: the role of the topology in decentralized learningabstractIn data-parallel optimization of machine learning models, workers collaborate to improve their estimates of the model: more accurate gradients allow them to use larger learning rates and optimize faster. We consider the setting in which all workers sample from the same dataset, and communicate over a sparse graph (decentralized). In this setting, current theory fails to capture important aspects of real-world behavior. First, the ‘spectral gap’ of the communication graph is not predictive of its empirical performance in (deep) learning. Second, current theory does not explain that collaboration enables larger learning rates than training alone. In fact, it prescribes smaller learning rates, which further decrease as graphs become larger, failing to explain convergence in infinite graphs. This paper aims to paint an accurate picture of sparsely-connected distributed optimization when workers share the same data distribution. We quantify how the graph topology influences convergence in a quadratic toy problem and provide theoretical results for general smooth and (strongly) convex objectives. Our theory matches empirical observations in deep learning, and accurately describes the relative merits of different graph topologies. Thijs Vogels, Hadrien Hendrikx, Martin Jaggi |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | RelaySum for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous DataabstractIn decentralized machine learning, workers compute model updates on their local data.Because the workers only communicate with few neighbors without central coordination, these updates propagate progressively over the network.This paradigm enables distributed training on networks without all-to-all connectivity, helping to protect data privacy as well as to reduce the communication cost of distributed training in data centers.A key challenge, primarily in decentralized deep learning, remains the handling of differences between the workers' local data distributions.To tackle this challenge, we introduce the RelaySum mechanism for information propagation in decentralized learning.RelaySum uses spanning trees to distribute information exactly uniformly across all workers with finite delays depending on the distance between nodes.In contrast, the typical gossip averaging mechanism only distributes data uniformly asymptotically while using the same communication volume per step as RelaySum.We prove that RelaySGD, based on this mechanism, is independent of data heterogeneity and scales to many workers, enabling highly accurate decentralized deep learning on heterogeneous data. Thijs Vogels, Lie He, Anastasia Koloskova, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Tao Lin 0004, Sebastian U. Stich, Martin Jaggi |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Deep Compositional Denoising for High-quality Monte Carlo RenderingabstractAbstract We propose a deep‐learning method for automatically decomposing noisy Monte Carlo renderings into components that kernel‐predicting denoisers can denoise more effectively. In our model, a neural decomposition module learns to predict noisy components and corresponding feature maps, which are consecutively reconstructed by a denoising module. The components are predicted based on statistics aggregated at the pixel level by the renderer. Denoising these components individually allows the use of per‐component kernels that adapt to each component's noisy signal characteristics. Experimentally, we show that the proposed decomposition module consistently improves the denoising quality of current state‐of‐the‐art kernel‐predicting denoisers on large‐scale academic and production datasets. Xianyao Zhang, Marco Manzi, Thijs Vogels, Henrik Dahlberg, Markus Gross 0001, Marios Papas |
Comput. Graph. Forum | 3 |
| 2020 | Optimizer Benchmarking Needs to Account for Hyperparameter TuningabstractThe performance of optimizers, particularly in deep learning, depends considerably on their chosen hyperparameter configuration. The efficacy of optimizers is often studied under near-optimal problem-specific hyperparameters, and finding these settings may be prohibitively costly for practitioners. In this work, we argue that a fair assessment of optimizers’ performance must take the computational cost of hyperparameter tuning into account, i.e., how easy it is to find good hyperparameter configurations using an automatic hyperparameter search. Evaluating a variety of optimizers on an extensive set of standard datasets and architectures, our results indicate that Adam is the most practical solution, particularly in low-budget scenarios. Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad, Florian Mai, Thijs Vogels, Martin Jaggi, François Fleuret |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Practical Low-Rank Communication Compression in Decentralized Deep LearningabstractLossy gradient compression has become a practical tool to overcome the communication bottleneck in centrally coordinated distributed training of machine learning models. However, algorithms for decentralized training with compressed communication over arbitrary connected networks have been more complicated, requiring additional memory and hyperparameters. We introduce a simple algorithm that directly compresses the model differences between neighboring workers using low-rank linear compressors. We prove that our method does not require any additional hyperparameters, converges faster than prior methods, and is asymptotically independent of both the network and the compression. Inspired the PowerSGD algorithm for centralized deep learning, we execute power iteration steps on model differences to maximize the information transferred per bit. Out of the box, these compressors perform on par with state-of-the-art tuned compression algorithms in a series of deep learning benchmarks. Thijs Vogels, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Martin Jaggi |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed OptimizationabstractWe study gradient compression methods to alleviate the communication bottleneck in data-parallel distributed optimization. Despite the significant attention received, current compression schemes either do not scale well, or fail to achieve the target test accuracy. We propose a low-rank gradient compressor that can i) compress gradients rapidly, ii) efficiently aggregate the compressed gradients using all-reduce, and iii) achieve test performance on par with SGD. The proposed algorithm is the only method evaluated that achieves consistent wall-clock speedups when benchmarked against regular SGD with an optimized communication backend. We demonstrate reduced training times for convolutional networks as well as LSTMs on common datasets. Thijs Vogels, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Martin Jaggi |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Web2Text: Deep Structured Boilerplate Removal
Thijs Vogels, Octavian-Eugen Ganea, Carsten Eickhoff |
ECIR | 1 |
| 2018 | Denoising with kernel prediction and asymmetric loss functionsabstractWe present a modular convolutional architecture for denoising rendered images. We expand on the capabilities of kernel-predicting networks by combining them with a number of task-specific modules, and optimizing the assembly using an asymmetric loss. The source-aware encoder---the first module in the assembly---extracts low-level features and embeds them into a common feature space, enabling quick adaptation of a trained network to novel data. The spatial and temporal modules extract abstract, high-level features for kernel-based reconstruction, which is performed at three different spatial scales to reduce low-frequency artifacts. The complete network is trained using a class of asymmetric loss functions that are designed to preserve details and provide the user with a direct control over the variance-bias trade-off during inference. We also propose an error-predicting module for inferring reconstruction error maps that can be used to drive adaptive sampling. Finally, we present a theoretical analysis of convergence rates of kernel-predicting architectures, shedding light on why kernel prediction performs better than synthesizing the colors directly, complementing the empirical evidence presented in this and previous works. We demonstrate that our networks attain results that compare favorably to state-of-the-art methods in terms of detail preservation, low-frequency noise removal, and temporal stability on a variety of production and academic datasets. Thijs Vogels, Fabrice Rousselle, Brian McWilliams, Gerhard Röthlin, Alex Harvill, David Adler, Mark Meyer, Jan Novák |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |
| 2017 | Kernel-predicting convolutional networks for denoising Monte Carlo renderingsabstractRegression-based algorithms have shown to be good at denoising Monte Carlo (MC) renderings by leveraging its inexpensive by-products (e.g., feature buffers). However, when using higher-order models to handle complex cases, these techniques often overfit to noise in the input. For this reason, supervised learning methods have been proposed that train on a large collection of reference examples, but they use explicit filters that limit their denoising ability. To address these problems, we propose a novel, supervised learning approach that allows the filtering kernel to be more complex and general by leveraging a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture. In one embodiment of our framework, the CNN directly predicts the final denoised pixel value as a highly non-linear combination of the input features. In a second approach, we introduce a novel, kernel-prediction network which uses the CNN to estimate the local weighting kernels used to compute each denoised pixel from its neighbors. We train and evaluate our networks on production data and observe improvements over state-of-the-art MC denoisers, showing that our methods generalize well to a variety of scenes. We conclude by analyzing various components of our architecture and identify areas of further research in deep learning for MC denoising. Steve Bako, Thijs Vogels, Brian McWilliams, Mark Meyer, Jan Novák, Alex Harvill, Pradeep Sen, Tony DeRose, Fabrice Rousselle |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |
| 2015 | Towards a Burglary Risk Profiler Using Demographic and Spatial Factors
Cristina Kadar, Grammatiki Zanni, Thijs Vogels, Irena Pletikosa |
WISE (1) | 3 |