VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Faustine Maffre
dblp:169/8402
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-9678-2013ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 52% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 32% Multi-agent systems · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › non-classical logics
epistemic logic |
0.6 | 2 | 2021 | A lightweight epistemic logic and its application to planning · Artif. Intell. 2021 Epistemic Boolean Games Based on a Logic of Visibility and Control · IJCAI 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
epistemic planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A lightweight epistemic logic and its application to planning · Artif. Intell. 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › game theory
boolean games |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Epistemic Boolean Games Based on a Logic of Visibility and Control · IJCAI 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
epistemic reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Building Epistemic Logic from Observations and Public Announcements · KR 2016 |
Logic in computer science › epistemic logic
dynamic epistemic logic |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Building Epistemic Logic from Observations and Public Announcements · KR 2016 |
Logic in computer science
epistemic logic |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Building Epistemic Logic from Observations and Public Announcements · KR 2016 |
Logic in computer science › epistemic logic › dynamic epistemic logic
public announcement logic |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Building Epistemic Logic from Observations and Public Announcements · KR 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
epistemic logic · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A lightweight epistemic logic and its application to planning
Martin C. Cooper, Andreas Herzig, Faustine Maffre, Frederic Maris, Elise Perrotin, Pierre Régnier |
Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 2017 | A Dynamic Logic Framework for Abstract Argumentation: Adding and Removing Arguments
Sylvie Doutre, Faustine Maffre, Peter McBurney |
IEA/AIE (2) | 2 |
| 2016 | A Simple Account of Multi-Agent Epistemic PlanningabstractA realistic model of multi-agent planning must allow us to formalize notions which are absent in classical planning, such as communication and knowledge. We investigate multi-agent planning based on a simple logic of knowledge that is grounded on the visibility of propositional variables. Using such a formal logic allows us to prove the existence of a plan given the description of the individual actions. We present an encoding of multi-agent planning problems expressed in this logic into the standard planning language PDDL. The solvability of a planning task is reduced to a model checking problem in a dynamic extension of our logic, proving its complexity. Feeding the resulting problem into a PDDL planner provides a provably correct plan for the original multi-agent planning problem. We apply our method on several examples such as the gossip problem. Martin C. Cooper, Andreas Herzig, Faustine Maffre, Frederic Maris, Pierre Régnier |
ECAI | 3 |
| 2016 | Simple Epistemic Planning: Generalised GossipingabstractThe gossip problem, in which information (secrets) must be shared among a certain number of agents using the minimum number of calls, is of interest in the conception of communication networks and protocols. We extend the gossip problem to arbitrary epistemic depths. For example, we may require not only that all agents know all secrets but also that all agents know that all agents know all secrets. We give optimal protocols for the generalised gossip problem, in the case of two-way communications, one-way communications and parallel communication. In the presence of negative goals testing the existence of a successful protocol is NP-complete. Martin C. Cooper, Andreas Herzig, Faustine Maffre, Frederic Maris, Pierre Régnier |
ECAI | 3 |
| 2016 | Epistemic Boolean Games Based on a Logic of Visibility and Control
Andreas Herzig, Emiliano Lorini, Faustine Maffre, François Schwarzentruber |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2016 | Building Epistemic Logic from Observations and Public Announcements
Tristan Charrier, Andreas Herzig, Emiliano Lorini, Faustine Maffre, François Schwarzentruber |
KR | 4 |