Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jelena Bradic

dblp:169/9679 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › high-dimensional estimation
debiased estimation
0.912025
Linear Hypothesis Testing in High-Dimensional Expected Shortfall Regression with Heavy-Tailed Errors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Mathematical optimization
high-dimensional statistics
0.912025
Linear Hypothesis Testing in High-Dimensional Expected Shortfall Regression with Heavy-Tailed Errors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
regularized regression
0.912025
Linear Hypothesis Testing in High-Dimensional Expected Shortfall Regression with Heavy-Tailed Errors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
sparse regression
0.912025
Linear Hypothesis Testing in High-Dimensional Expected Shortfall Regression with Heavy-Tailed Errors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Computational finance and economics
financial risk management
0.312025
Linear Hypothesis Testing in High-Dimensional Expected Shortfall Regression with Heavy-Tailed Errors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantile regression · 1.7l1 penalization · 1.7debiased estimator · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Linear Hypothesis Testing in High-Dimensional Expected Shortfall Regression with Heavy-Tailed Errors
abstract
Expected shortfall (ES) is widely used for characterizing the tail of a distribution across various fields, particularly in financial risk management. In this paper, we explore a two-step procedure that leverages an orthogonality property to reduce sensitivity to nuisance parameters when estimating within a joint quantile and expected shortfall regression framework. For high-dimensional sparse models, we propose a robust $\ell_1$-penalized two-step approach capable of handling heavy-tailed data distributions. We establish non-asymptotic estimation error bounds and propose an appropriate growth rate for the diverging robustification parameter. To facilitate statistical inference for certain linear combinations of the ES regression coefficients, we construct debiased estimators and develop their asymptotic distributions, which form the basis for constructing valid confidence intervals. We validate the proposed method through simulation studies, demonstrating its effectiveness in high-dimensional linear models with heavy-tailed errors.
Gaoyu Wu, Jelena Bradic, Kean Ming Tan, Wen-Xin Zhou
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2020 Censored Quantile Regression Forest
abstract
Random forests are powerful non-parametric regression method but are severely limited in their usage in the presence of randomly censored observations, and naively applied can exhibit poor predictive performance due to the incurred biases. Based on a local adaptive representation of random forests, we develop its regression adjustment for randomly censored regression quantile models. Regression adjustment is based on a new estimating equation that adapts to censoring and leads to quantile score whenever the data do not exhibit censoring. The proposed procedure named censored quantile regression forest, allows us to estimate quantiles of time-to-event without any parametric modeling assumption. We establish its consistency under mild model specifications. Numerical studies showcase a clear advantage of the proposed procedure.
Alexander Hanbo Li, Jelena Bradic
AISTATS2