Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leng-Feng Lee

dblp:17/2019 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 76% Multi-agent systems · 19% Robot manipulation · 6%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 87% Computational science and engineering · 13%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112010
Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
stiffness control
0.112010
Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.112010
Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot · ICRA 2010
Medical and health informatics › medical simulation
musculoskeletal simulation
0.112009
Case Studies of Musculoskeletal-Simulation-Based Rehabilitation Program Evaluation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2009
Medical and health informatics
rehabilitation
0.112009
Case Studies of Musculoskeletal-Simulation-Based Rehabilitation Program Evaluation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2009
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › multi-robot motion planning
distributed motion planning
0.112005
Comparison of Alternate Methods for Distributed Motion Planning of Robot Collectives within a Potential Field Framework · ICRA 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
formation control
0.112005
Comparison of Alternate Methods for Distributed Motion Planning of Robot Collectives within a Potential Field Framework · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
potential field planning
0.112005
Comparison of Alternate Methods for Distributed Motion Planning of Robot Collectives within a Potential Field Framework · ICRA 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
swarm robotics
0.112005
Comparison of Alternate Methods for Distributed Motion Planning of Robot Collectives within a Potential Field Framework · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Robot manipulation › parallel manipulator
cable-driven parallel robot
0.012010
Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot · ICRA 2010
Computational science and engineering › engineering design
simulation-based design
0.012009
Case Studies of Musculoskeletal-Simulation-Based Rehabilitation Program Evaluation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

redundancy resolution · 0.1co-simulation · 0.1parametric study · 0.1optimization · 0.1musculoskeletal analysis · 0.1penalty formulation · 0.1constrained multibody dynamics · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Enhanced trajectory tracking control with active lower bounded stiffness control for cable robot
abstract
Cable robots have seen considerable recent interest ensuing from their ability to combine a large workspace with significant payload capacity. However, the cables can apply forces to the end-effector only when they are in tension, and thus form a subclass of control problems requiring unilateral control inputs. Furthermore, actuation redundancy occurs when surplus cables are introduced within the system. On one hand, such redundancy needs to be carefully resolved for accurate tracking of the task. On the other hand, it allows the redistribution of the actuation forces to satisfy some secondary criteria. In this paper, we apply such redundancy for enhanced trajectory tracking by actively controlling the task stiffness of the end-effector. The scheme allow us to specify a lower bound of the task stiffness, which is intended to provide improved trajectory tracking and disturbance rejection performance. Finally, we illustrate the improved control performance within a virtual prototype cosimulation framework.
Leng-Feng Lee, Chin Pei Tang, Venkat N. Krovi
ICRA2
2009 Case Studies of Musculoskeletal-Simulation-Based Rehabilitation Program Evaluation
abstract
Variability in motor rehabilitation program outcomes can be attributed not only to individual components (human patient/rehabilitation equipment) but also to their system-level interactions. Thus, effective deployment of a rehabilitation program depends upon: 1) suitable therapist selection of user-device ergonomics; 2) adjustable device settings; and 3) exercise regimen parameters; to achieve desired system-level motor performance. In this paper, we discuss aspects of creation of a virtual design environment, leveraging tools from musculoskeletal analysis, optimization, and simulation-based design, to permit therapists to rapidly evaluate and systematically customize rehabilitation programs. Specifically, this framework is intended to facilitate 1) parametric study of ergonomic/device/regimen settings on musculoskeletal performance; 2) use of design tools such as optimization for decision support in arriving at the best program; and 3) scaffolded examination of linkage between form and function by iterative what-if type of analyses. We use two case studies (bicep-curling and motor rehabilitative driving) to highlight benefits of such simulation-based rehabilitation program evaluation.
Leng-Feng Lee, Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan, Srikanth Kannan, Frank Mendel, Venkat N. Krovi
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2005 Comparison of Alternate Methods for Distributed Motion Planning of Robot Collectives within a Potential Field Framework
abstract
In this paper, we evaluate the performance of two candidate formulations for distributed motion planning of robot collectives within an Artificial Potential Field (APF) framework. We exploit the parallel between the formulation of motion planning for group of robots coupled by constraints and the forward dynamics simulation of constrained multibody systems to develop the candidate approaches. We compare and contrast these approaches on the basis of ease of formulation, distribution of computation and overall computational accuracy. Traditionally penalty formulations have enjoyed a prominent position in motion planning of robot collectives due to their ease of formulation, decentralization and scalability. However, the instabilities introduced in the form of “formulation stiffness” at the algorithm development stage have the potential to hinder the subsequent control. Representative results from the distributed motion planning for a group of 3 point-mass robots moving in formation to a desired target location are used to highlight the differences.
Leng-Feng Lee, Rajankumar Bhatt, Venkat N. Krovi
ICRA1