Christian Rosenke

dblp:17/6756-1 · also Christian Hundt 0001 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
23ranked-venue papers
12as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-8222-8366ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 16 · 8 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Flood-It with Jewelry - Characterizing the Game Complexity for Cograph Generalizations
abstract
Flood-It is a single-player game played on a precolored graph G, where the objective is to make G monochromatic using as few flooding moves as possible. In each move, a color c is selected and all vertices reachable from a fixed pivot vertex via a monochromatic path are recolored with c. In the free variant, the pivot may be chosen anew in every move. Deciding whether a graph can be made monochromatic in at most k moves is NP-complete for both variants, fixed and free. This hardness persists even under strong structural restrictions such as split graphs and trees. The Free Flood-It variant is generally considered more difficult than its fixed-pivot counterpart, as it remains hard on several graph classes where the latter becomes tractable, including co-comparability and AT-free graphs. Cographs, that is, P₄-free graphs, are among the few classes on which even Free Flood-It is solvable in polynomial time and therefore serve as our starting point. We consider the ten natural one-vertex extensions of P₄ - referred to as jewels - and study the complexity of both flooding games on the 1024 graph classes obtained by forbidding subsets of these graphs as induced subgraphs. Our main contribution is a polynomial-time algorithm for Free Flood-It on graphs that are free of the three jewels bull, gem, and P₅, covering 128 of the 1024 classes. In addition, we prove that both variants remain NP-complete on thin-spider graphs, which exclude the eight jewels banner, co-banner, chair, gem, house, kite, P₅, and C₅, thereby establishing hardness for 256 additional classes. Combined with known algorithms and hardness results, our work determines the complexity of both Flood-It variants for 896 of the 1024 considered graph classes.
Martin Darmüntzel, Christian Rosenke, Mark Scheibner
MFCS2
2023 Computing Optimal Leaf Roots of Chordal Cographs in Linear Time
Van Bang Le, Christian Rosenke
FCT2
2020 The generic combinatorial algorithm for image matching with classes of projective transformations
Christian Rosenke, Maciej Liskiewicz
Inf. Comput.1
2020 The complexity of synthesizing elementary net systems relative to natural parameters
Christian Rosenke, Ronny Tredup
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
2019 The Complexity of Synthesis for 43 Boolean Petri Net Types
Ronny Tredup, Christian Rosenke
TAMC2
2018 Elementary Net Synthesis Remains NP-Complete Even for Extremely Simple Inputs
Ronny Tredup, Christian Rosenke, Karsten Wolf
Petri Nets2
2018 Narrowing down the Hardness Barrier of Synthesizing Elementary Net Systems
abstract
Elementary net system feasibility is the problem to decide for a given automaton A if there is a certain boolean Petri net with a state graph isomorphic to A. This is equivalent to the conjunction of the state separation property (SSP) and the event state separation property (ESSP). Since feasibility, SSP and ESSP are known to be NP-complete in general, there was hope that the restriction of graph parameters for A can lead to tractable and practically relevant subclasses. In this paper, we analyze event manifoldness, the amount of occurrences that an event can have in A, and state degree, the number of allowed successors and predecessors of states in A, as natural input restrictions. Recently, it has been shown that all three decision problems, feasibility, SSP and ESSP, remain NP-complete for linear A where every event occurs at most three times. Here, we show that these problems remain hard even if every event occurs at most twice. Nevertheless, this has to be paid by relaxing the restriction on state degree, allowing every state to have two successor and two predecessor states. As we also show that SSP becomes tractable for linear A where every event occurs at most twice the only open cases left are ESSP and feasibilty for the same input restriction.
Ronny Tredup, Christian Rosenke
CONCUR2
2016 The exact complexity of projective image matching
Christian Rosenke
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
2015 Towards a Characterization of Leaf Powers by Clique Arrangements
Ragnar Nevries, Christian Rosenke
SOFSEM2
2015 Characterizing and computing the structure of clique intersections in strongly chordal graphs
Ragnar Nevries, Christian Rosenke
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2013 Characterizing and Computing the Structure of Clique Intersections in Strongly Chordal Graphs
Ragnar Nevries, Christian Rosenke
WG2
2012 Efficient Two-Dimensional Pattern Matching with Scaling and Rotation and Higher-Order Interpolation
Christian Rosenke, Florian Wendland
CPM1
2010 Affine Image Matching Is Uniform TC0-Complete
Christian Rosenke
CPM1
2010 Efficient Edge Domination on Hole-Free Graphs in Polynomial Time
Andreas Brandstädt, Christian Rosenke, Ragnar Nevries
LATIN2
2009 New Complexity Bounds for Image Matching under Rotation and Scaling
Christian Rosenke, Maciej Liskiewicz
CPM1
2009 A combinatorial geometrical approach to two-dimensional robust pattern matching with scaling and rotation
Christian Rosenke, Maciej Liskiewicz, Ragnar Nevries
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2008 Algorithms and Implementation for Interconnection Graph Problem
Hongbing Fan, Christian Rosenke, Yu-Liang Wu, Jason Ernst
COCOA2
2008 Damaged BZip Files Are Difficult to Repair
Christian Rosenke, Ulf Ochsenfahrt
COCOON1
2008 Two-Dimensional Pattern Matching with Combined Scaling and Rotation
Christian Rosenke, Maciej Liskiewicz
CPM1
2008 Ptolemaic Graphs and Interval Graphs Are Leaf Powers
Andreas Brandstädt, Christian Rosenke
LATIN2
2008 Combinatorial Bounds and Algorithmic Aspects of Image Matching under Projective Transformations
Christian Rosenke, Maciej Liskiewicz
MFCS1
2007 On the Complexity of Affine Image Matching
Christian Rosenke, Maciej Liskiewicz
STACS1
2006 Provably Secure Steganography and the Complexity of Sampling
Christian Rosenke, Maciej Liskiewicz, Ulrich Wölfel
ISAAC1