VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hanting Xie
dblp:170/5352
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 35% 3D vision · 35% Trustworthy machine learning · 30% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › neural rendering
3d gaussian splatting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MiDSummer: Multi-Guidance Diffusion for Controllable Zero-Shot Immersive Gaussian Splatting Scene Generation · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d generation
3d scene generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MiDSummer: Multi-Guidance Diffusion for Controllable Zero-Shot Immersive Gaussian Splatting Scene Generation · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
controllable scene generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MiDSummer: Multi-Guidance Diffusion for Controllable Zero-Shot Immersive Gaussian Splatting Scene Generation · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MiDSummer: Multi-Guidance Diffusion for Controllable Zero-Shot Immersive Gaussian Splatting Scene Generation · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inherently Interpretable Time Series Classification via Multiple Instance Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
multiple instance learning explanation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inherently Interpretable Time Series Classification via Multiple Instance Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian splatting · 0.9diffusion · 0.9multiple instance learning · 0.8deep learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MiDSummer: Multi-Guidance Diffusion for Controllable Zero-Shot Immersive Gaussian Splatting Scene Generation
Anjun Hu, Richard Tomsett, Valentin Gourmet, Massimo Camplani, Jas Kandola, Hanting Xie |
ICCV | 6 |
| 2025 | Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation for Efficient Object SegmentationabstractSegment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in image/video object segmentation across many domains, but its large encoder makes it challenging for resource-constrained devices or real-time applications. One solution to this problem is to carry out knowledge distillation from the bulky encoder to a lightweight encoder, but this can result in degraded performance. In this work, we investigate multi-teacher distillation to mitigate performance degradation for distilled segmentation models. Using several foundation teacher models, our multi-teacher distilled models achieve 3.2 times speedup during end-to-end inference compared to SAM2 while achieving the best results of 74.4 and 71.1 (72.1 and 69.6 for single-teacher distillation) mIoU on the COCO and LVIS image segmentation datasets, as well as showing competitive results on video segmentation. Our results show that multi-teacher distillation offers a powerful solution for efficient image/video segmentation, while also maintaining compelling performance. Simon Zeng, Kurt Cutajar, Hanting Xie, Massimo Camplani, Richard Tomsett, Niall Twomey, Jas Kandola, Gavin K. C. Cheung |
ICIP | 3 |
| 2024 | Inherently Interpretable Time Series Classification via Multiple Instance LearningabstractConventional Time Series Classification (TSC) methods are often black boxes that obscure inherent interpretation of their decision-making processes. In this work, we leverage Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) to overcome this issue, and propose a new framework called MILLET: Multiple Instance Learning for Locally Explainable Time series classification. We apply MILLET to existing deep learning TSC models and show how they become inherently interpretable without compromising (and in some cases, even improving) predictive performance. We evaluate MILLET on 85 UCR TSC datasets and also present a novel synthetic dataset that is specially designed to facilitate interpretability evaluation. On these datasets, we show MILLET produces sparse explanations quickly that are of higher quality than other well-known interpretability methods. To the best of our knowledge, our work with MILLET is the first to develop general MIL methods for TSC and apply them to an extensive variety of domains. Joseph Early, Gavin K. C. Cheung, Kurt Cutajar, Hanting Xie, Jas Kandola, Niall Twomey |
ICLR | 4 |