Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gábor Melis

dblp:170/6677 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Language models and text generation · 25% Generative modeling · 18% Deep learning architectures and training · 17%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
1.022022
Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Variational Smoothing in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
recurrent neural network language model
0.722019
Variational Smoothing in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Memory Architectures in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › mutual information
mutual information estimation
0.612022
Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
posterior collapse
0.612022
Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.612022
Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
language model architecture
0.412020
Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM
0.412020
Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.412020
Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
memory architectures
0.312018
Memory Architectures in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model
0.312018
On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.312018
On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.212016
Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
semi-supervised semantic parsing
0.212016
Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence transduction
0.212016
Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
sequential autoencoder
0.212016
Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational lower bound · 0.6mutual information constraint · 0.6kullback-leibler divergence estimation · 0.6variational inference · 0.4smoothing · 0.4recurrent neural network · 0.3semi-supervised learning · 0.2latent variable generative model · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling
abstract
Posterior collapse is a common failure mode of density models trained as variational autoencoders, wherein they model the data without relying on their latent variables, rendering these variables useless. We focus on two factors contributing to posterior collapse, that have been studied separately in the literature. First, the underspecification of the model, which in an extreme but common case allows posterior collapse to be the theoretical optimium. Second, the looseness of the variational lower bound and the related underestimation of the utility of the latents. We weave these two strands of research together, specifically the tighter bounds of multi-sample Monte-Carlo objectives and constraints on the mutual information between the observable and the latent variables. The main obstacle is that the usual method of estimating the mutual information as the average Kullback-Leibler divergence between the easily available variational posterior q(z|x) and the prior does not work with Monte-Carlo objectives because their q(z|x) is not a direct approximation to the model's true posterior p(z|x). Hence, we construct estimators of the Kullback-Leibler divergence of the true posterior from the prior by recycling samples used in the objective, with which we train models of continuous and discrete latents at much improved rate-distortion and no posterior collapse. While alleviated, the tradeoff between modelling the data and using the latents still remains, and we urge for evaluating inference methods across a range of mutual information values.
Gábor Melis, András György 0001, Phil Blunsom
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2020 Mogrifier LSTM
Gábor Melis, Tomás Kociský, Phil Blunsom
ICLR1
2019 Variational Smoothing in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models
Lingpeng Kong, Gábor Melis, Wang Ling, Lei Yu 0008, Dani Yogatama
ICLR (Poster)2
2018 On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Models
Gábor Melis, Chris Dyer, Phil Blunsom
ICLR (Poster)1
2018 Memory Architectures in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models
Dani Yogatama, Yishu Miao, Gábor Melis, Wang Ling, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Chris Dyer, Phil Blunsom
ICLR (Poster)3
2018 The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challenge
abstract
Reading comprehension (RC)—in contrast to information retrieval—requires integrating information and reasoning about events, entities, and their relations across a full document. Question answering is conventionally used to assess RC ability, in both artificial agents and children learning to read. However, existing RC datasets and tasks are dominated by questions that can be solved by selecting answers using superficial information (e.g., local context similarity or global term frequency); they thus fail to test for the essential integrative aspect of RC. To encourage progress on deeper comprehension of language, we present a new dataset and set of tasks in which the reader must answer questions about stories by reading entire books or movie scripts. These tasks are designed so that successfully answering their questions requires understanding the underlying narrative rather than relying on shallow pattern matching or salience. We show that although humans solve the tasks easily, standard RC models struggle on the tasks presented here. We provide an analysis of the dataset and the challenges it presents.
Tomás Kociský, Jonathan Schwarz, Phil Blunsom, Chris Dyer, Karl Moritz Hermann, Gábor Melis, Edward Grefenstette
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics6
2016 Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders
abstract
We present a novel semi-supervised approach for sequence transduction and apply it to semantic parsing.The unsupervised component is based on a generative model in which latent sentences generate the unpaired logical forms.We apply this method to a number of semantic parsing tasks focusing on domains with limited access to labelled training data and extend those datasets with synthetically generated logical forms.
Tomás Kociský, Gábor Melis, Edward Grefenstette, Chris Dyer, Wang Ling, Phil Blunsom, Karl Moritz Hermann
EMNLP2