Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gábor Melis
dblp:170/6677
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 25% Generative modeling · 18% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Variational Smoothing in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
recurrent neural network language model |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Variational Smoothing in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2019 Memory Architectures in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › mutual information
mutual information estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
posterior collapse |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language Modelling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
language model architecture |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mogrifier LSTM · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
memory architectures |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Memory Architectures in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
semi-supervised semantic parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence transduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
sequential autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential Autoencoders · EMNLP 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational lower bound · 0.6mutual information constraint · 0.6kullback-leibler divergence estimation · 0.6variational inference · 0.4smoothing · 0.4recurrent neural network · 0.3semi-supervised learning · 0.2latent variable generative model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Mutual Information Constraints for Monte-Carlo Objectives to Prevent Posterior Collapse Especially in Language ModellingabstractPosterior collapse is a common failure mode of density models trained as variational autoencoders, wherein they model the data without relying on their latent variables, rendering these variables useless. We focus on two factors contributing to posterior collapse, that have been studied separately in the literature. First, the underspecification of the model, which in an extreme but common case allows posterior collapse to be the theoretical optimium. Second, the looseness of the variational lower bound and the related underestimation of the utility of the latents. We weave these two strands of research together, specifically the tighter bounds of multi-sample Monte-Carlo objectives and constraints on the mutual information between the observable and the latent variables. The main obstacle is that the usual method of estimating the mutual information as the average Kullback-Leibler divergence between the easily available variational posterior q(z|x) and the prior does not work with Monte-Carlo objectives because their q(z|x) is not a direct approximation to the model's true posterior p(z|x). Hence, we construct estimators of the Kullback-Leibler divergence of the true posterior from the prior by recycling samples used in the objective, with which we train models of continuous and discrete latents at much improved rate-distortion and no posterior collapse. While alleviated, the tradeoff between modelling the data and using the latents still remains, and we urge for evaluating inference methods across a range of mutual information values. Gábor Melis, András György 0001, Phil Blunsom |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | Mogrifier LSTM
Gábor Melis, Tomás Kociský, Phil Blunsom |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | Variational Smoothing in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models
Lingpeng Kong, Gábor Melis, Wang Ling, Lei Yu 0008, Dani Yogatama |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Models
Gábor Melis, Chris Dyer, Phil Blunsom |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Memory Architectures in Recurrent Neural Network Language Models
Dani Yogatama, Yishu Miao, Gábor Melis, Wang Ling, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Chris Dyer, Phil Blunsom |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2018 | The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension ChallengeabstractReading comprehension (RC)—in contrast to information retrieval—requires integrating information and reasoning about events, entities, and their relations across a full document. Question answering is conventionally used to assess RC ability, in both artificial agents and children learning to read. However, existing RC datasets and tasks are dominated by questions that can be solved by selecting answers using superficial information (e.g., local context similarity or global term frequency); they thus fail to test for the essential integrative aspect of RC. To encourage progress on deeper comprehension of language, we present a new dataset and set of tasks in which the reader must answer questions about stories by reading entire books or movie scripts. These tasks are designed so that successfully answering their questions requires understanding the underlying narrative rather than relying on shallow pattern matching or salience. We show that although humans solve the tasks easily, standard RC models struggle on the tasks presented here. We provide an analysis of the dataset and the challenges it presents. Tomás Kociský, Jonathan Schwarz, Phil Blunsom, Chris Dyer, Karl Moritz Hermann, Gábor Melis, Edward Grefenstette |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 6 |
| 2016 | Semantic Parsing with Semi-Supervised Sequential AutoencodersabstractWe present a novel semi-supervised approach for sequence transduction and apply it to semantic parsing.The unsupervised component is based on a generative model in which latent sentences generate the unpaired logical forms.We apply this method to a number of semantic parsing tasks focusing on domains with limited access to labelled training data and extend those datasets with synthetically generated logical forms. Tomás Kociský, Gábor Melis, Edward Grefenstette, Chris Dyer, Wang Ling, Phil Blunsom, Karl Moritz Hermann |
EMNLP | 2 |