Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Sherstnev

dblp:170/9234 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multiple sequence alignment
0.312018
JABAWS 2.2 distributed web services for Bioinformatics: protein disorder, conservation and RNA secondary structure · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein disorder prediction
0.312018
JABAWS 2.2 distributed web services for Bioinformatics: protein disorder, conservation and RNA secondary structure · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.312018
JABAWS 2.2 distributed web services for Bioinformatics: protein disorder, conservation and RNA secondary structure · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA secondary structure prediction
0.312018
JABAWS 2.2 distributed web services for Bioinformatics: protein disorder, conservation and RNA secondary structure · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.312018
JABAWS 2.2 distributed web services for Bioinformatics: protein disorder, conservation and RNA secondary structure · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › differential expression analysis
RNA-seq differential expression
0.212015
Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics
0.212015
Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics
0.212015
Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment · Bioinform. 2015
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.112018
JABAWS 2.2 distributed web services for Bioinformatics: protein disorder, conservation and RNA secondary structure · Bioinform. 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing
job scheduling
0.112018
JABAWS 2.2 distributed web services for Bioinformatics: protein disorder, conservation and RNA secondary structure · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

web services · 0.7negative binomial model · 0.2log-normal model · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 JABAWS 2.2 distributed web services for Bioinformatics: protein disorder, conservation and RNA secondary structure
abstract
Summary: JABAWS 2.2 is a computational framework that simplifies the deployment of web services for Bioinformatics. In addition to the five multiple sequence alignment (MSA) algorithms in JABAWS 1.0, JABAWS 2.2 includes three additional MSA programs (Clustal Omega, MSAprobs, GLprobs), four protein disorder prediction methods (DisEMBL, IUPred, Ronn, GlobPlot), 18 measures of protein conservation as implemented in AACon, and RNA secondary structure prediction by the RNAalifold program. JABAWS 2.2 can be deployed on a variety of in-house or hosted systems. JABAWS 2.2 web services may be accessed from the Jalview multiple sequence analysis workbench (Version 2.8 and later), as well as directly via the JABAWS command line interface (CLI) client. JABAWS 2.2 can be deployed on a local virtual server as a Virtual Appliance (VA) or simply as a Web Application Archive (WAR) for private use. Improvements in JABAWS 2.2 also include simplified installation and a range of utility tools for usage statistics collection, and web services querying and monitoring. The JABAWS CLI client has been updated to support all the new services and allow integration of JABAWS 2.2 services into conventional scripts. A public JABAWS 2 server has been in production since December 2011 and served over 800 000 analyses for users worldwide. Availability and implementation: JABAWS 2.2 is made freely available under the Apache 2 license and can be obtained from: http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/jabaws. Contact: [email protected].
Peter V. Troshin, James B. Procter, Alexander Sherstnev, Daniel L. Barton, Fábio Madeira, Geoffrey J. Barton
Bioinform.3
2015 Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is now the standard method to determine differential gene expression. Identifying differentially expressed genes crucially depends on estimates of read-count variability. These estimates are typically based on statistical models such as the negative binomial distribution, which is employed by the tools edgeR, DESeq and cuffdiff. Until now, the validity of these models has usually been tested on either low-replicate RNA-seq data or simulations. RESULTS: A 48-replicate RNA-seq experiment in yeast was performed and data tested against theoretical models. The observed gene read counts were consistent with both log-normal and negative binomial distributions, while the mean-variance relation followed the line of constant dispersion parameter of ∼0.01. The high-replicate data also allowed for strict quality control and screening of 'bad' replicates, which can drastically affect the gene read-count distribution. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: RNA-seq data have been submitted to ENA archive with project ID PRJEB5348. CONTACT: [email protected].
Marek Gierlinski, Christian Cole, Pietà Schofield, Nicholas J. Schurch, Alexander Sherstnev, Vijender Singh, Nicola Wrobel, Karim Gharbi, Gordon G. Simpson, Tom Owen-Hughes, Mark L. Blaxter, Geoffrey J. Barton
Bioinform.5