VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jakob Zech
dblp:171/9952
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 55% Generative modeling · 21% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Scheduling of Dynamic Transport · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
distribution learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distribution Learning via Neural Differential Equations: A Nonparametric Statistical Perspective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distribution Learning via Neural Differential Equations: A Nonparametric Statistical Perspective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distribution Learning via Neural Differential Equations: A Nonparametric Statistical Perspective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse Problems · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
inverse problems |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse Problems · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
multilevel optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse Problems · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse Problems · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Scheduling of Dynamic Transport · COLT 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gamma-convergence · 0.9calculus of variations · 0.9ordinary differential equation · 0.8metric entropy · 0.8likelihood maximization · 0.8multilevel optimization theory · 0.6langevin sampling · 0.6ensemble kalman inversion · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Optimal Scheduling of Dynamic TransportabstractFlow-based methods for sampling and generative modeling use continuous-time dynamical systems to represent a {transport map} that pushes forward a source measure to a target measure. The introduction of a time axis provides considerable design freedom, and a central question is how to exploit this freedom. Though many popular methods seek straight line (i.e., zero acceleration) trajectories, we show here that a specific class of “curved” trajectories can significantly improve approximation and learning. In particular, we consider the unit-time interpolation of any given transport map $T$ and seek the schedule $\tau: [0,1] \to [0,1]$ that minimizes the spatial Lipschitz constant of the corresponding velocity field over all times $t \in [0,1]$. This quantity is crucial as it allows for control of the approximation error when the velocity field is learned from data. We show that, for a broad class of source/target measures and transport maps $T$, the \emph{optimal schedule} can be computed in closed form, and that the resulting optimal Lipschitz constant is \emph{exponentially smaller} than that induced by an identity schedule (corresponding to, for instance, the Wasserstein geodesic). Our proof technique relies on the calculus of variations and $\Gamma$-convergence, allowing us to approximate the aforementioned degenerate objective by a family of smooth, tractable problems. Panos Tsimpos, Zhi Ren 0003, Jakob Zech, Youssef Marzouk 0001 |
COLT | 3 |
| 2024 | Distribution Learning via Neural Differential Equations: A Nonparametric Statistical PerspectiveabstractOrdinary differential equations (ODEs), via their induced flow maps, provide a powerful framework to parameterize invertible transformations for representing complex probability distributions. While such models have achieved enormous success in machine learning, little is known about their statistical properties. This work establishes the first general nonparametric statistical convergence analysis for distribution learning via ODE models trained through likelihood maximization. We first prove a convergence theorem applicable to arbitrary velocity field classes $\mathcal{F}$ satisfying certain simple boundary constraints. This general result captures the trade-off between the approximation error and complexity of the ODE model. We show that the latter can be quantified via the $C^1$-metric entropy of the class $\mathcal{F}$. We then apply this general framework to the setting of $C^k$-smooth target densities, and establish nearly minimax-optimal convergence rates for two relevant velocity field classes $\mathcal{F}$: $C^k$ functions and neural networks. The latter is the practically important case of neural ODEs. Our results also provide insight on how the choice of velocity field class, and the dependence of this choice on sample size (e.g., the scaling of neural network classes), impact statistical performance. Youssef Marzouk 0001, Zhi Ren 0003, Sven Wang, Jakob Zech |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2023 | De Rham compatible Deep Neural Network FEMabstractOn general regular simplicial partitions T of bounded polytopal domains Ω⊂Rd, d∈{2,3}, we construct exact neural network (NN) emulations of all lowest order finite element spaces in the discrete de Rham complex. These include the spaces of piecewise constant functions, continuous piecewise linear (CPwL) functions, the classical “Raviart–Thomas element”, and the “Nédélec edge element”. For all but the CPwL case, our network architectures employ both ReLU (rectified linear unit) and BiSU (binary step unit) activations to capture discontinuities. In the important case of CPwL functions, we prove that it suffices to work with pure ReLU nets. Our construction and DNN architecture generalizes previous results in that no geometric restrictions on the regular simplicial partitions T of Ω are required for DNN emulation. In addition, for CPwL functions our DNN construction is valid in any dimension d≥2. Our “FE-Nets” are required in the variationally correct, structure-preserving approximation of boundary value problems of electromagnetism in nonconvex polyhedra Ω⊂R3. They are thus an essential ingredient in the application of e.g., the methodology of “physics-informed NNs” or “deep Ritz methods” to electromagnetic field simulation via deep learning techniques. We indicate generalizations of our constructions to higher-order compatible spaces and other, non-compatible classes of discretizations, in particular the “Crouzeix–Raviart” elements and Hybridized, Higher Order (HHO) methods. Marcello Longo, Joost A. A. Opschoor, Nico Disch, Christoph Schwab, Jakob Zech |
Neural Networks | 5 |
| 2022 | Multilevel Optimization for Inverse ProblemsabstractInverse problems occur in a variety of parameter identification tasks in engineering. Such problems are challenging in practice, as they require repeated evaluation of computationally expensive forward models. We introduce a unifying framework of multilevel optimization that can be applied to a wide range of optimization-based solvers. Our framework provably reduces the computational cost associated with evaluating the expensive forward maps stemming from various physical models. To demonstrate the versatility of our analysis, we discuss its implications for various methodologies including multilevel (accelerated, stochastic) gradient descent, a multilevel ensemble Kalman inversion and a multilevel Langevin sampler. We also provide numerical experiments to verify our theoretical findings. Simon Weissmann, Ashia Wilson, Jakob Zech |
COLT | 3 |