Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elna L. Otter

dblp:172/2965 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code
0.011986
A Method of Examining Orchard Codes for Minimum Hamming Distance Five · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1986
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
minimum hamming distance
0.011986
A Method of Examining Orchard Codes for Minimum Hamming Distance Five · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1986
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
convolutional codes
0.011986
A Method of Examining Orchard Codes for Minimum Hamming Distance Five · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parity analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 A Method of Examining Orchard Codes for Minimum Hamming Distance Five
abstract
Orchard codes are linear, systematic tree codes of rate(n - 1)/nand infinite block length. Calculation of parity bits is over prior parity bits, as well as prior information bits. The memory needed to encode is about half that of comparable convolutional self-orthogonal codes. After a brief review of recent work involving two-error-correcting orchard codes [1], [2], the authors present a method of analysis of orchard codes to establish whether minimal distance criteria are met. It is assumed that parity is taken over three bits per track. The code introduced by Scott and Goetschel [1], and a truncated version of the code designed by Shiozaki [2], are then analyzed. New orchard codes, designed on the basis of the analysis method, are presented. The method is extendible to codes designed to correct more than two errors, although extension beyond three errors is computationally intensive.
Elna L. Otter, Ronald C. de Vries
IEEE Trans. Commun.1