Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elna L. Otter
dblp:172/2965
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | A Method of Examining Orchard Codes for Minimum Hamming Distance Five · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1986 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
minimum hamming distance |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | A Method of Examining Orchard Codes for Minimum Hamming Distance Five · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1986 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
convolutional codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | A Method of Examining Orchard Codes for Minimum Hamming Distance Five · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1986 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parity analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | A Method of Examining Orchard Codes for Minimum Hamming Distance FiveabstractOrchard codes are linear, systematic tree codes of rate(n - 1)/nand infinite block length. Calculation of parity bits is over prior parity bits, as well as prior information bits. The memory needed to encode is about half that of comparable convolutional self-orthogonal codes. After a brief review of recent work involving two-error-correcting orchard codes [1], [2], the authors present a method of analysis of orchard codes to establish whether minimal distance criteria are met. It is assumed that parity is taken over three bits per track. The code introduced by Scott and Goetschel [1], and a truncated version of the code designed by Shiozaki [2], are then analyzed. New orchard codes, designed on the basis of the analysis method, are presented. The method is extendible to codes designed to correct more than two errors, although extension beyond three errors is computationally intensive. Elna L. Otter, Ronald C. de Vries |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |