VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Manel Baradad Jurjo
dblp:172/7727 · also Manel Baradad
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 42% 3D vision · 11% Robot navigation and mapping · 11% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 52% Computational photography and imaging · 33% Rendering · 15% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual memory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Separating Knowledge and Perception with Procedural Data · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Separating Knowledge and Perception with Procedural Data · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
self-supervised visual representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Vision Check-up for Language Models · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural Image Programs for Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training › data-centric pre-training
synthetic pre-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural Image Programs for Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning to See by Looking at Noise · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Height and Uprightness Invariance for 3D Prediction From a Single View · CVPR 2020 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image deblurring
blind deconvolution |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Using Unknown Occluders to Recover Hidden Scenes · CVPR 2019 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image deblurring |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Using Unknown Occluders to Recover Hidden Scenes · CVPR 2019 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Using Unknown Occluders to Recover Hidden Scenes · CVPR 2019 |
Computational photography and imaging
non-line-of-sight imaging |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Using Unknown Occluders to Recover Hidden Scenes · CVPR 2019 |
Rendering
light transport |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Inferring Light Fields From Shadows · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Separating Knowledge and Perception with Procedural Data · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Separating Knowledge and Perception with Procedural Data · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › open-world segmentation
zero-shot segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Separating Knowledge and Perception with Procedural Data · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › visual representation learning
image representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural Image Programs for Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic training data |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Learning to See by Looking at Noise · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
procedural data generation · 0.9image embedding retrieval · 0.9large language model · 0.8code-based image representation · 0.8unsupervised learning · 0.6supervised learning · 0.6OpenGL rendering · 0.6deep generative model · 0.5contrastive loss · 0.5regularization · 0.4motion sparsity · 0.4blind deconvolution · 0.4light transport modeling · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Separating Knowledge and Perception with Procedural DataabstractWe train representation models with procedural data only, and apply them on visual similarity, classification, and semantic segmentation tasks without further training by using visual memory—an explicit database of reference image embeddings. Unlike prior work on visual memory, our approach achieves full compartmentalization with respect to all real-world images while retaining strong performance. Compared to a model trained on Places, our procedural model performs within 1% on NIGHTS visual similarity, outperforms by 8% and 15% on CUB200 and Flowers102 fine-grained classification, and is within 10% on ImageNet-1K classification. It also demonstrates strong zero-shot segmentation, achieving an $R^2$ on COCO within 10% of the models trained on real data. Finally, we analyze procedural versus real data models, showing that parts of the same object have dissimilar representations in procedural models, resulting in incorrect searches in memory and explaining the remaining performance gap. Adrián Rodríguez-Muñoz, Manel Baradad Jurjo, Phillip Isola, Antonio Torralba 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | A Vision Check-up for Language ModelsabstractWhat does learning to model relationships between strings teach Large Language Models (LLMs) about the visual world? We systematically evaluate LLMs' abilities to generate and recognize an assortment of visual concepts of increasing complexity and then demonstrate how a preliminary visual representation learning system can be trained using models of text. As language models lack the ability to consume or output visual information as pixels, we use code to represent images in our study. Although LLM-generated images do not look like natural images, results on image generation and the ability of models to correct these generated images indicate that precise modeling of strings can teach language models about numerous aspects of the visual world. Furthermore, experiments on self-supervised visual representation learning, utilizing images generated with text models, highlight the potential to train vision models capable of making semantic assessments of natural images using just LLMs. Pratyusha Sharma, Tamar Rott Shaham, Manel Baradad Jurjo, Adrián Rodríuez-Muñoz, Shivam Duggal, Phillip Isola, Antonio Torralba 0001, Stephanie Fu |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2022 | Procedural Image Programs for Representation LearningabstractLearning image representations using synthetic data allows training neural networks without some of the concerns associated with real images, such as privacy and bias. Existing work focuses on a handful of curated generative processes which require expert knowledge to design, making it hard to scale up. To overcome this, we propose training with a large dataset of twenty-one thousand programs, each one generating a diverse set of synthetic images. These programs are short code snippets, which are easy to modify and fast to execute using OpenGL. The proposed dataset can be used for both supervised and unsupervised representation learning, and reduces the gap between pre-training with real and procedurally generated images by 38%. Manel Baradad Jurjo, Chun-Fu Chen 0001, Jonas Wulff, Tongzhou Wang 0001, Rogério Feris, Antonio Torralba 0001, Phillip Isola |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning to See by Looking at NoiseabstractCurrent vision systems are trained on huge datasets, and these datasets come with costs: curation is expensive, they inherit human biases, and there are concerns over privacy and usage rights. To counter these costs, interest has surged in learning from cheaper data sources, such as unlabeled images. In this paper we go a step further and ask if we can do away with real image datasets entirely, instead learning from procedural noise processes. We investigate a suite of image generation models that produce images from simple random processes. These are then used as training data for a visual representation learner with a contrastive loss. In particular, we study statistical image models, randomly initialized deep generative models, and procedural graphics models.Our findings show that it is important for the noise to capture certain structural properties of real data but that good performance can be achieved even with processes that are far from realistic. We also find that diversity is a key property to learn good representations. Manel Baradad Jurjo, Jonas Wulff, Tongzhou Wang 0001, Phillip Isola, Antonio Torralba 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Height and Uprightness Invariance for 3D Prediction From a Single ViewabstractCurrent state-of-the-art methods that predict 3D from single images ignore the fact that the height of objects and their upright orientation is invariant to the camera pose and intrinsic parameters. To account for this, we propose a system that directly regresses 3D world coordinates for each pixel. First, our system predicts the camera position with respect to the ground plane and its intrinsic parameters. Followed by that, it predicts the 3D position for each pixel along the rays spanned by the camera. The predicted 3D coordinates and normals are invariant to a change in the camera position or its model, and we can directly impose a regression loss on these world coordinates. Our approach yields competitive results for depth and camera pose estimation (while not being explicitly trained to predict any of these) and improves across-dataset generalization performance over existing state-of-the-art methods. Manel Baradad Jurjo, Antonio Torralba 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2019 | Using Unknown Occluders to Recover Hidden ScenesabstractWe consider the challenging problem of inferring a hidden moving scene from faint shadows cast on a diffuse surface. Recent work in passive non-line-of-sight (NLoS) imaging has shown that the presence of occluding objects in between the scene and the diffuse surface significantly improves the conditioning of the problem. However, that work assumes that the shape of the occluder is known a priori. In this paper, we relax this often impractical assumption, extending the range of applications for passive occluder-based NLoS imaging systems. We formulate the task of jointly recovering the unknown scene and unknown occluder as a blind deconvolution problem, for which we propose a simple but effective two-step algorithm. At the first step, the algorithm exploits motion in the scene in order to obtain an estimate of the occluder. In particular, it exploits the fact that motion in realistic scenes is typically sparse. The second step is more standard: using regularization, we deconvolve by the occluder estimate to solve for the hidden scene. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method with simulations and experiments in a variety of settings. Adam B. Yedidia, Manel Baradad Jurjo, Christos Thrampoulidis, William T. Freeman, Gregory W. Wornell |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2018 | Inferring Light Fields From ShadowsabstractWe present a method for inferring a 4D light field of a hidden scene from 2D shadows cast by a known occluder on a diffuse wall. We do this by determining how light naturally reflected off surfaces in the hidden scene interacts with the occluder. By modeling the light transport as a linear system, and incorporating prior knowledge about light field structures, we can invert the system to recover the hidden scene. We demonstrate results of our inference method across simulations and experiments with different types of occluders. For instance, using the shadow cast by a real house plant, we are able to recover low resolution light fields with different levels of texture and parallax complexity. We provide two experimental results: a human subject and two planar elements at different depths. Manel Baradad Jurjo, Vickie Ye, Adam B. Yedidia, Frédo Durand, William T. Freeman, Gregory W. Wornell, Antonio Torralba 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2015 | Characterizing chronic disease and polymedication prescription patterns from electronic health recordsabstractPopulation aging in developed countries brings an increased prevalence of chronic disease and of polymedication-patients with several prescribed types of medication. Attention to chronic, polymedicated patients is a priority for its high cost and the associated risks, and tools for analyzing, understanding, and managing this reality are becoming necessary. We describe a prototype of a system for discovering, analyzing, and visualizing the co-occurrence of diagnostics, interventions, and medication prescriptions in a large patient database. The final tool is intended to be used both by health managers and planners and for primary care clinicians in direct contact with patients (for example for detecting unusual disease patterns and incorrect or missing medication). At the core of the analysis module there is a representation of diagnostics and medications as a hypergraph, and the most crucial functionalities rely on hypergraph transversal/variants of association rule discovery methods, with particular emphasis on discovering surprising or alarming combinations. The test database comes from the primary care system in the area of Barcelona for 2013, with over 1.6 million potential patients and almost 20 million diagnostics and prescriptions. Martí Zamora, Manel Baradad Jurjo, Ester Amado, Silvia Cordomi, Esther Limon, Juliana Ribera, Marta Arias, Ricard Gavaldà |
DSAA | 2 |