Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiaohong Wan

dblp:172/8248 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% Vision and language · 11%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › abstract reasoning › abstract visual reasoning
raven's progressive matrices
1.322023
RuleMatch: Matching Abstract Rules for Semi-supervised Learning of Human Standard Intelligence Tests · IJCAI 2023
Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence Tests · ICML 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › abstract reasoning
abstract visual reasoning
0.712023
RuleMatch: Matching Abstract Rules for Semi-supervised Learning of Human Standard Intelligence Tests · IJCAI 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
analogical reasoning
0.712023
Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence Tests · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.712023
Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence Tests · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
predictive representation learning
0.712023
Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence Tests · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
residual network
0.712023
Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence Tests · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.712023
RuleMatch: Matching Abstract Rules for Semi-supervised Learning of Human Standard Intelligence Tests · IJCAI 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
visual analogical reasoning
0.712023
Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence Tests · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-level data augmentation · 0.7residual network · 0.7pseudo-labeling · 0.7prediction error · 0.7convolutional neural network · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Neural Prediction Errors enable Analogical Visual Reasoning in Human Standard Intelligence Tests
abstract
Deep neural networks have long been criticized for lacking the ability to perform analogical visual reasoning. Here, we propose a neural network model to solve Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) - one of the standard intelligence tests in human psychology. Specifically, we design a reasoning block based on the well-known concept of prediction error (PE) in neuroscience. Our reasoning block uses convolution to extract abstract rules from high-level visual features of the 8 context images and generates the features of a predicted answer. PEs are then calculated between the predicted features and those of the 8 candidate answers, and are then passed to the next stage. We further integrate our novel reasoning blocks into a residual network and build a new Predictive Reasoning Network (PredRNet). Extensive experiments show that our proposed PredRNet achieves state-of-the-art average performance on several important RPM benchmarks. PredRNet also shows good generalization abilities in a variety of out-of-distribution scenarios and other visual reasoning tasks. Most importantly, our PredRNet forms low-dimensional representations of abstract rules and minimizes hierarchical prediction errors during model training, supporting the critical role of PE minimization in visual reasoning. Our work highlights the potential of using neuroscience theories to solve abstract visual reasoning problems in artificial intelligence. The code is available at https://github.com/ZjjConan/AVR-PredRNet.
Lingxiao Yang, Hongzhi You, Zonglei Zhen, Dahui Wang, Xiaohong Wan, Xiaohua Xie, Ru-Yuan Zhang
ICML5
2023 RuleMatch: Matching Abstract Rules for Semi-supervised Learning of Human Standard Intelligence Tests
abstract
Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM), one of the standard intelligence tests in human psychology, has recently emerged as a powerful tool for studying abstract visual reasoning (AVR) abilities in machines. Although existing computational models for RPM problems achieve good performance, they require a large number of labeled training examples for supervised learning. In contrast, humans can efficiently solve unlabeled RPM problems after learning from only a few example questions. Here, we develop a semi-supervised learning (SSL) method, called RuleMatch, to train deep models with a small number of labeled RPM questions along with other unlabeled questions. Moreover, instead of using pixel-level augmentation in object perception tasks, we exploit the nature of RPM problems and augment the data at the level of abstract rules. Specifically, we disrupt the possible rules contained among context images in an RPM question and force the two augmented variants of the same unlabeled sample to obey the same abstract rule and predict a common pseudo label for training. Extensive experiments show that the proposed RuleMatch achieves state-of-the-art performance on two popular RAVEN datasets. Our work makes an important stride in aligning abstract analogical visual reasoning abilities in machines and humans. Our Code is at https://github.com/ZjjConan/AVR-RuleMatch.
Yunlong Xu 0001, Lingxiao Yang, Hongzhi You, Zonglei Zhen, Da-Hui Wang, Xiaohong Wan, Xiaohua Xie, Ru-Yuan Zhang
IJCAI6
2012 Changes in Cognitive Processes upon Learning Mini-Shogi
Takeshi Ito, Daisuke Takano, Xiaohong Wan, Keiji Tanaka
CogSci3