Chuang Zhou 0002

dblp:173/2852-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3041-0591ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Language models and text generation · 35% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 34% Graph learning · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Information retrieval · 46% Recommender systems · 25% Knowledge graphs · 16%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
1.322026
Collision to Cognition: Hash-Driven Graph Construction for Efficient RAG · ACL (1) 2026
LogicPoison: Logical Attacks on Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph
1.012026
Reliable Reasoning Path: Distilling Effective Guidance for LLM Reasoning With Knowledge Graphs · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
1.012026
Reliable Reasoning Path: Distilling Effective Guidance for LLM Reasoning With Knowledge Graphs · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph reasoning
path-based reasoning
1.012026
Reliable Reasoning Path: Distilling Effective Guidance for LLM Reasoning With Knowledge Graphs · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
reasoning structure
1.012026
You Don't Need Pre-Built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning Structures · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
You Don't Need Pre-Built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning Structures · AAAI 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval-augmented generation
graph-based retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
Collision to Cognition: Hash-Driven Graph Construction for Efficient RAG · ACL (1) 2026
Graph data management › graph extraction
graph construction
1.012026
Collision to Cognition: Hash-Driven Graph Construction for Efficient RAG · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph embedding
1.012026
Query-Aware Knowledge Retrieval via Hyperbolic Structuring · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval-augmented generation
knowledge retrieval
1.012026
Query-Aware Knowledge Retrieval via Hyperbolic Structuring · ACL (1) 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › large language model attack
adversarial attack on retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
LogicPoison: Logical Attacks on Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph representation learning
text-attributed graph learning
0.912025
Taming Language Models for Text-attributed Graph Learning with Decoupled Aggregation · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge-intensive question answering
knowledge-based question answering
0.812024
Cost-efficient Knowledge-based Question Answering with Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
resource-efficient inference
0.812024
Cost-efficient Knowledge-based Question Answering with Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.712023
Adaptive Popularity Debiasing Aggregator for Graph Collaborative Filtering · SIGIR 2023
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
graph collaborative filtering
0.712023
Adaptive Popularity Debiasing Aggregator for Graph Collaborative Filtering · SIGIR 2023
Recommender systems › debiased recommendation
popularity bias mitigation
0.712023
Adaptive Popularity Debiasing Aggregator for Graph Collaborative Filtering · SIGIR 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation
0.312026
You Don't Need Pre-Built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning Structures · AAAI 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models
graph-based retrieval
0.312026
LogicPoison: Logical Attacks on Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.212023
Adaptive Popularity Debiasing Aggregator for Graph Collaborative Filtering · SIGIR 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › message passing
neighborhood aggregation
0.212023
Adaptive Popularity Debiasing Aggregator for Graph Collaborative Filtering · SIGIR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph neural network · 2.2logical attack · 2.0graph retrieval-augmented generation · 2.0thompson sampling · 1.5multi-armed bandit · 1.5context-aware policy · 1.5debiasing loss · 1.3topological sort · 1.0knowledge distillation · 1.0hyperbolic embedding · 1.0hashing · 1.0graph pruning · 1.0graph construction · 1.0directed acyclic graph · 1.0decoupled aggregation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 You Don't Need Pre-Built Graphs for RAG: Retrieval Augmented Generation with Adaptive Reasoning Structures
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucination, generating factually incorrect statements when handling questions beyond their knowledge and perception. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses this by retrieving query-relevant contexts from knowledge bases to support LLM reasoning. Recent advances leverage pre-constructed graphs to capture the relational connections among distributed documents, showing remarkable performance in complex tasks. However, existing Graph-based RAG (GraphRAG) methods rely on a costly process to transform the corpus into a graph, introducing overwhelming token cost and update latency. Moreover, real-world queries vary in type and complexity, requiring different logic structures for accurate reasoning. The pre-built graph may not align with these required structures, resulting in ineffective knowledge retrieval. To this end, we propose a Logic-aware Retrieval Augmented Generation framework (LogicRAG) that dynamically extracts reasoning structures at inference time to guide adaptive retrieval without any pre-built graph. LogicRAG begins by decomposing the input query into a set of subproblems and constructing a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to model the logical dependencies among them. To support coherent multi-step reasoning, LogicRAG then linearizes the graph using topological sort, so that subproblems can be addressed in a logically consistent order. Besides, LogicRAG applies graph pruning to reduce redundant retrieval and uses context pruning to filter irrelevant context, significantly reducing the overall token cost. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LogicRAG achieves both superior performance and efficiency compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Shengyuan Chen, Chuang Zhou 0002, Zheng Yuan 0013, Qinggang Zhang, Zeyang Cui, Hao Chen 0062, Yilin Xiao 0002, Jiannong Cao 0001, Xiao Huang 0001
AAAI2
2026 LogicPoison: Logical Attacks on Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation
abstract
Yilin Xiao, Jin Chen, Qinggang Zhang, Yujing Zhang, Chuang Zhou, Longhao Yang, Lingfei Ren, Xin Yang, Xiao Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Yilin Xiao 0002, Qinggang Zhang, Yujing Zhang 0001, Chuang Zhou 0002, Longhao Yang, Lingfei Ren, Xiao Huang 0001
ACL (1)5
2026 Query-Aware Knowledge Retrieval via Hyperbolic Structuring
abstract
Chuang Zhou, Junnan Dong, Yilin Xiao, Shengyuan Chen, Su Dong, di Yin, Xing Sun, Zhaozhuo Xu, Xiao Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Chuang Zhou 0002, Junnan Dong, Yilin Xiao 0002, Shengyuan Chen, Su Dong 0002, Xing Sun 0001, Zhaozhuo Xu, Xiao Huang 0001
ACL (1)1
2026 Collision to Cognition: Hash-Driven Graph Construction for Efficient RAG
abstract
Chuang Zhou, Zheng Yuan, Linhao Luo, Zhaozhuo Xu, Yilin Xiao, Junnan Dong, Siyu An, di Yin, Xing Sun, Xiao Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Chuang Zhou 0002, Zheng Yuan 0013, Linhao Luo, Zhaozhuo Xu, Yilin Xiao 0002, Junnan Dong, Siyu An, Xing Sun 0001, Xiao Huang 0001
ACL (1)1
2026 Reliable Reasoning Path: Distilling Effective Guidance for LLM Reasoning With Knowledge Graphs
Yilin Xiao 0002, Chuang Zhou 0002, Qinggang Zhang, Bo Li 0037, Qing Li 0001, Xiao Huang 0001
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2025 Taming Language Models for Text-attributed Graph Learning with Decoupled Aggregation
abstract
Chuang Zhou, Zhu Wang, Shengyuan Chen, Jiahe Du, Qiyuan Zheng, Zhaozhuo Xu, Xiao Huang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Chuang Zhou 0002, Zhu Wang 0016, Shengyuan Chen, Jiahe Du, Zhaozhuo Xu, Xiao Huang 0001
ACL (1)1
2025 Text-Attributed Graph Learning with Coupled Augmentations
abstract
Modeling text-attributed graphs is a well-known problem due to the difficulty of capturing both the text attribute and the graph structure effectively. Existing models often focus on either the text attribute or the graph structure, potentially neglecting the other aspect. This is primarily because both text learning and graph learning models require significant computational resources, making it impractical to directly connect these models in a series. However, there are situations where text-learning models correctly classify text-attributed nodes, while graph-learning models may classify them incorrectly, and vice versa. To fully leverage the potential of text-attributed graphs, we propose a Coupled Text-attributed Graph Learning (CTGL) framework that combines the strengths of both text-learning and graph-learning models in parallel and avoids the computational cost of serially connecting the two aspect models. Specifically, CTGL introduces coupled text-graph augmentation to enable coupled contrastive learning and facilitate the exchange of valuable information between text learning and graph learning. Experimental results on diverse datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our model compared to state-of-the-art text-learning and graph-learning baselines.
Chuang Zhou 0002, Jiahe Du, Huachi Zhou, Hao Chen 0062, Feiran Huang, Xiao Huang 0001
COLING1
2024 Cost-efficient Knowledge-based Question Answering with Large Language Models
abstract
Knowledge-based question answering (KBQA) is widely used in many scenarios that necessitate domain knowledge. Large language models (LLMs) bring opportunities to KBQA, while their costs are significantly higher and absence of domain-specific knowledge during pre-training. We are motivated to combine LLMs and prior small models on knowledge graphs (KGMs) for both inferential accuracy and cost saving. However, it remains challenging since accuracy and cost are not readily combined in the optimization as two distinct metrics. It is also laborious for model selection since different models excel in diverse knowledge. To this end, we propose Coke, a novel cost-efficient strategy for KBQA with LLMs, modeled as a tailored multi-armed bandit problem to minimize calls to LLMs within limited budgets. We first formulate the accuracy expectation with a cluster-level Thompson Sampling for either KGMs or LLMs. A context-aware policy is optimized to further distinguish the expert model subject to the question semantics. The overall decision is bounded by the cost regret according to historical expenditure on failures. Extensive experiments showcase the superior performance of Coke, which moves the Pareto frontier with up to 20.89% saving of GPT-4 fees while achieving a 2.74% higher accuracy on the benchmark datasets.
Junnan Dong, Qinggang Zhang, Chuang Zhou 0002, Hao Chen 0062, Daochen Zha, Xiao Huang 0001
NeurIPS3
2023 Adaptive Popularity Debiasing Aggregator for Graph Collaborative Filtering
abstract
The graph neural network-based collaborative filtering (CF) models user-item interactions as a bipartite graph and performs iterative aggregation to enhance performance. Unfortunately, the aggregation process may amplify the popularity bias, which impedes user engagement with niche (unpopular) items. While some efforts have studied the popularity bias in CF, they often focus on modifying loss functions, which can not fully address the popularity bias in GNN-based CF models. This is because the debiasing loss can be falsely backpropagated to non-target nodes during the backward pass of the aggregation.
Huachi Zhou, Hao Chen 0062, Junnan Dong, Daochen Zha, Chuang Zhou 0002, Xiao Huang 0001
SIGIR5