VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew Thorpe
dblp:173/4472
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2480-5404ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 24% Graph learning · 21% Optimization for machine learning · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Expected Sliced Transport Plans · ICLR 2025 Sliced Optimal Partial Transport · CVPR 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
sliced optimal transport |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Expected Sliced Transport Plans · ICLR 2025 Sliced Optimal Partial Transport · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty-Based Smooth Policy Regularisation for Reinforcement Learning with Few Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty-Based Smooth Policy Regularisation for Reinforcement Learning with Few Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
probability metric |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Expected Sliced Transport Plans · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sparse reward reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty-Based Smooth Policy Regularisation for Reinforcement Learning with Few Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
wasserstein distance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Expected Sliced Transport Plans · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
partial optimal transport |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sliced Optimal Partial Transport · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph diffusion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GRAND++: Graph Neural Diffusion with A Source Term · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GRAND++: Graph Neural Diffusion with A Source Term · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GRAND++: Graph Neural Diffusion with A Source Term · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
graph-based semi-supervised learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Poisson Learning: Graph Based Semi-Supervised Learning At Very Low Label Rates · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Poisson Learning: Graph Based Semi-Supervised Learning At Very Low Label Rates · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
manifold generative modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Representing and Learning High Dimensional Data With the Optimal Transport Map From a Probabilistic Viewpoint · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Representing and Learning High Dimensional Data With the Optimal Transport Map From a Probabilistic Viewpoint · CVPR 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
manipulation skill learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Uncertainty-Based Smooth Policy Regularisation for Reinforcement Learning with Few Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud registration |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Sliced Optimal Partial Transport · CVPR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal transport · 1.7entropic regularization · 1.7slicing · 1.3linear programming · 1.3uncertainty quantification · 0.9policy regularization · 0.9ensemble methods · 0.9source term · 0.6graph diffusion · 0.6graph cuts · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Expected Sliced Transport PlansabstractThe optimal transport (OT) problem has gained significant traction in modern machine learning for its ability to: (1) provide versatile metrics, such as Wasserstein distances and their variants, and (2) determine optimal couplings between probability measures. To reduce the computational complexity of OT solvers, methods like entropic regularization and sliced optimal transport have been proposed. The sliced OT framework improves efficiency by comparing one-dimensional projections (slices) of high-dimensional distributions. However, despite their computational efficiency, sliced-Wasserstein approaches lack a transportation plan between the input measures, limiting their use in scenarios requiring explicit coupling. In this paper, we address two key questions: Can a transportation plan be constructed between two probability measures using the sliced transport framework? If so, can this plan be used to define a metric between the measures? We propose a ‘lifting’ operation to extend one-dimensional optimal transport plans back to the original space of the measures. By computing the expectation of these lifted plans, we derive a new transportation plan, termed expected sliced transport (EST) plans. We further prove that using the EST plan to weight the sum of the individual Euclidean costs $\|x - y\|^p$ for moving from $x$ to $y$ results in a valid metric between the input discrete probability measures. Finally, we demonstrate the connection between our approach and the recently proposed min-SWGG, along with illustrative numerical examples that support our theoretical findings. Rocio Diaz Martin, Yikun Bai, Ashkan Shahbazi, Matthew Thorpe, Akram Aldroubi, Soheil Kolouri |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2025 | Uncertainty-Based Smooth Policy Regularisation for Reinforcement Learning with Few DemonstrationsabstractIn reinforcement learning with sparse rewards, demonstrations can accelerate learning, but determining when to imitate them remains challenging. We propose Smooth Policy Regularisation from Demonstrations (SPReD), a framework that addresses the fundamental question: when should an agent imitate a demonstration versus follow its own policy? SPReD uses ensemble methods to explicitly model Q-value distributions for both demonstration and policy actions, quantifying uncertainty for comparisons. We develop two complementary uncertainty-aware methods: a probabilistic approach estimating the likelihood of demonstration superiority, and an advantage-based approach scaling imitation by statistical significance. Unlike prevailing methods (e.g. Q-filter) that make binary imitation decisions, SPReD applies continuous, uncertainty-proportional regularisation weights, reducing gradient variance during training. Despite its computational simplicity, SPReD achieves remarkable gains in experiments across eight robotics tasks, outperforming existing approaches by up to a factor of 14 in complex tasks while maintaining robustness to demonstration quality and quantity. Our code is available at https://github.com/YujieZhu7/SPReD. Charles A. Hepburn, Matthew Thorpe, Giovanni Montana |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | A linear transportation Lp distance for pattern recognitionabstractThe transportation Lp distance, denoted TLp, has been proposed as a generalisation of Wasserstein Wp distances motivated by the property that it can be applied directly to colour or multi-channelled images, as well as multivariate time-series without normalisation or mass constraints. These distances, as with Wp, are powerful tools in modelling data with spatial or temporal perturbations. However, their computational cost can make them infeasible to apply to even moderate pattern recognition tasks. We propose linear versions of these distances and show that the linear TLp distance significantly improves over the linear Wp distance on signal processing tasks, whilst being several orders of magnitude faster to compute than the TLp distance. Oliver M. Crook, Mihai Cucuringu, Tim Hurst, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Matthew Thorpe, Konstantinos C. Zygalakis |
Pattern Recognit. | 5 |
| 2023 | Sliced Optimal Partial TransportabstractOptimal transport (OT) has become exceedingly popular in machine learning, data science, and computer vision. The core assumption in the OT problem is the equal total amount of mass in source and target measures, which limits its application. Optimal Partial Transport (OPT) is a recently proposed solution to this limitation. Similar to the OT problem, the computation of OPT relies on solving a linear programming problem (often in high dimensions), which can become computationally prohibitive. In this paper, we propose an efficient algorithm for calculating the OPT problem between two non-negative measures in one dimension. Next, following the idea of sliced OT distances, we utilize slicing to define the Sliced OPT distance. Finally, we demonstrate the computational and accuracy benefits of the Sliced OPT-based method in various numerical experiments. In particular, we show an application of our proposed Sliced OPT problem in noisy point cloud registration and color adaptation. Our code is available at Github Link. Yikun Bai, Bernhard Schmitzer, Matthew Thorpe, Soheil Kolouri |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2022 | GRAND++: Graph Neural Diffusion with A Source Term
Matthew Thorpe, Tan M. Nguyen, Hedi Xia, Thomas Strohmer, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Stanley J. Osher, Bao Wang 0001 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | The Linearized Hellinger-Kantorovich DistanceabstractIn this paper we study the local linearization of the Hellinger--Kantorovich distance via its Riemannian structure. We give explicit expressions for the logarithmic and exponential maps and identify a suitable notion of a Riemannian inner product. Samples can thus be represented as vectors in the tangent space of a suitable reference measure where the norm locally approximates the original metric. Working with the local linearization and the corresponding embeddings allows for the advantages of the Euclidean setting, such as faster computations and a plethora of data analysis tools, while still enjoying approximately the descriptive power of the Hellinger--Kantorovich metric. Tianji Cai, Junyi Cheng, Bernhard Schmitzer, Matthew Thorpe |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 4 |
| 2020 | Poisson Learning: Graph Based Semi-Supervised Learning At Very Low Label RatesabstractWe propose a new framework, called Poisson learning, for graph based semi-supervised learning at very low label rates. Poisson learning is motivated by the need to address the degeneracy of Laplacian semi-supervised learning in this regime. The method replaces the assignment of label values at training points with the placement of sources and sinks, and solves the resulting Poisson equation on the graph. The outcomes are provably more stable and informative than those of Laplacian learning. Poisson learning is efficient and simple to implement, and we present numerical experiments showing the method is superior to other recent approaches to semi-supervised learning at low label rates on MNIST, FashionMNIST, and Cifar-10. We also propose a graph-cut enhancement of Poisson learning, called Poisson MBO, that gives higher accuracy and can incorporate prior knowledge of relative class sizes. Jeff Calder, Brendan Cook, Matthew Thorpe, Dejan Slepcev |
ICML | 3 |
| 2018 | Representing and Learning High Dimensional Data With the Optimal Transport Map From a Probabilistic ViewpointabstractIn this paper, we propose a generative model in the space of diffeomorphic deformation maps. More precisely, we utilize the Kantarovich-Wasserstein metric and accompanying geometry to represent an image as a deformation from templates. Moreover, we incorporate a probabilistic viewpoint by assuming that each image is locally generated from a reference image. We capture the local structure by modelling the tangent planes at reference images. Once basis vectors for each tangent plane are learned via probabilistic PCA, we can sample a local coordinate, that can be inverted back to image space exactly. With experiments using 4 different datasets, we show that the generative tangent plane model in the optimal transport (OT) manifold can be learned with small numbers of images and can be used to create infinitely many 'unseen' images. In addition, the Bayesian classification accompanied with the probabilist modeling of the tangent planes shows improved accuracy over that done in the image space. Combining the results of our experiments supports our claim that certain datasets can be better represented with the Kantarovich-Wasserstein metric. We envision that the proposed method could be a practical solution to learning and representing data that is generated with templates in situatons where only limited numbers of data points are available. Se Rim Park, Matthew Thorpe |
CVPR | 2 |