VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Konstantin Lopyrev
dblp:173/5061
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 91% Information extraction and text analysis · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
extractive question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
reading comprehension datasets |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
logistic regression · 0.2dependency parsing · 0.2constituency parsing · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of TextabstractWe present the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD), a new reading comprehension dataset consisting of 100,000+ questions posed by crowdworkers on a set of Wikipedia articles, where the answer to each question is a segment of text from the corresponding reading passage. We analyze the dataset to understand the types of reasoning required to answer the questions, leaning heavily on dependency and constituency trees. We build a strong logistic regression model, which achieves an F1 score of 51.0%, a significant improvement over a simple baseline (20%). However, human performance (86.8%) is much higher, indicating that the dataset presents a good challenge problem for future research. The dataset is freely available at https://stanford-qa.com Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang 0049, Konstantin Lopyrev, Percy Liang |
EMNLP | 3 |