Konstantin Lopyrev

dblp:173/5061 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 91% Information extraction and text analysis · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
extractive question answering
0.212016
SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension
0.212016
SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
reading comprehension datasets
0.212016
SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.112016
SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logistic regression · 0.2dependency parsing · 0.2constituency parsing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
abstract
We present the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD), a new reading comprehension dataset consisting of 100,000+ questions posed by crowdworkers on a set of Wikipedia articles, where the answer to each question is a segment of text from the corresponding reading passage. We analyze the dataset to understand the types of reasoning required to answer the questions, leaning heavily on dependency and constituency trees. We build a strong logistic regression model, which achieves an F1 score of 51.0%, a significant improvement over a simple baseline (20%). However, human performance (86.8%) is much higher, indicating that the dataset presents a good challenge problem for future research. The dataset is freely available at https://stanford-qa.com
Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang 0049, Konstantin Lopyrev, Percy Liang
EMNLP3