Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick Pamphile

dblp:173/6915 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning paradigms · 67% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning
0.712023
Risk Bounds for Positive-Unlabeled Learning Under the Selected At Random Assumption · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
risk bounds
0.712023
Risk Bounds for Positive-Unlabeled Learning Under the Selected At Random Assumption · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.712023
Risk Bounds for Positive-Unlabeled Learning Under the Selected At Random Assumption · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

minimax risk analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Risk Bounds for Positive-Unlabeled Learning Under the Selected At Random Assumption
abstract
Positive-Unlabeled learning (PU learning) is a special case of semi-supervised binary classification where only a fraction of positive examples is labeled. The challenge is then to find the correct classifier despite this lack of information. Recently, new methodologies have been introduced to address the case where the probability of being labeled may depend on the covariates. In this paper, we are interested in establishing risk bounds for PU learning under this general assumption. In addition, we quantify the impact of label noise on PU learning compared to the standard classification setting. Finally, we provide a lower bound on the minimax risk proving that the upper bound is almost optimal.
Olivier Coudray, Christine Keribin, Pascal Massart, Patrick Pamphile
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4