Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Patrick Pamphile
dblp:173/6915
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 67% Learning theory · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Risk Bounds for Positive-Unlabeled Learning Under the Selected At Random Assumption · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
risk bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Risk Bounds for Positive-Unlabeled Learning Under the Selected At Random Assumption · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Risk Bounds for Positive-Unlabeled Learning Under the Selected At Random Assumption · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimax risk analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Risk Bounds for Positive-Unlabeled Learning Under the Selected At Random AssumptionabstractPositive-Unlabeled learning (PU learning) is a special case of semi-supervised binary classification where only a fraction of positive examples is labeled. The challenge is then to find the correct classifier despite this lack of information. Recently, new methodologies have been introduced to address the case where the probability of being labeled may depend on the covariates. In this paper, we are interested in establishing risk bounds for PU learning under this general assumption. In addition, we quantify the impact of label noise on PU learning compared to the standard classification setting. Finally, we provide a lower bound on the minimax risk proving that the upper bound is almost optimal. Olivier Coudray, Christine Keribin, Pascal Massart, Patrick Pamphile |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |