Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sachini Herath

dblp:174/1935 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0761-3796ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Wireless sensing and localization · 80% Internet of things and sensor networks · 20%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless sensing and localization
indoor localization
1.232022
Neural Inertial Localization · CVPR 2022
Fusion-DHL: WiFi, IMU, and Floorplan Fusion for Dense History of Locations in Indoor Environments · ICRA 2021
RoNIN: Robust Neural Inertial Navigation in the Wild: Benchmark, Evaluations, & New Methods · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › GPS-denied localization
indoor localization
0.612022
Single User WiFi Structure from Motion in the Wild · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.612022
Single User WiFi Structure from Motion in the Wild · ICRA 2022
Internet of things and sensor networks › motion sensing › inertial sensing
inertial localization
0.612022
Neural Inertial Localization · CVPR 2022
Wireless sensing and localization
multi-sensor fusion
0.512021
Fusion-DHL: WiFi, IMU, and Floorplan Fusion for Dense History of Locations in Indoor Environments · ICRA 2021
Wireless sensing and localization › navigation
inertial navigation
0.412020
RoNIN: Robust Neural Inertial Navigation in the Wild: Benchmark, Evaluations, & New Methods · ICRA 2020
Wireless sensing and localization › indoor localization
wifi localization
0.112021
Fusion-DHL: WiFi, IMU, and Floorplan Fusion for Dense History of Locations in Indoor Environments · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inertial navigation · 1.1transformer · 0.6self-supervised neural network · 0.6bundle adjustment · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.5neural network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 PEOPLEx: PEdestrian Opportunistic Positioning LEveraging IMU, UWB, BLE and WiFi
abstract
This paper advances the field of pedestrian localization by introducing a unifying framework for opportunistic positioning based on nonlinear factor graph optimization. While many existing approaches assume constant availability of one or multiple sensing signals, our methodology employs IMU-based pedestrian inertial navigation as the backbone for sensor fusion, opportunistically integrating Ultra- Wideband (UWB), Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and WiFi signals when they are available in the environment. The proposed PEOPLEx framework is designed to incorporate sensing data as it becomes available, operating without any prior knowledge about the environment (e.g. anchor locations, radio frequency maps, etc.), Our contributions are twofold: 1) we introduce an opportunistic multi-sensor and real-time pedestrian positioning framework fusing the available sensor measurements; 2) we develop novel factors for adaptive scaling and coarse loop closures, significantly improving the precision of indoor positioning. Experimental validation confirms that our approach achieves accurate localization estimates in real indoor scenarios using commercial smartphones.
Pierre-Yves Lajoie, Bobak H. Baghi, Sachini Herath, Francois Robert Hogan, Xue Liu 0004, Gregory Dudek
ICC3
2022 Neural Inertial Localization
abstract
This paper proposes the inertial localization problem, the task of estimating the absolute location from a sequence of inertial sensor measurements. This is an exciting and unexplored area of indoor localization research, where we present a rich dataset with 53 hours of inertial sensor data and the associated ground truth locations. We developed a solution, dubbed neural inertial localization (NILoc) which 1) uses a neural inertial navigation technique to turn inertial sensor history to a sequence of velocity vectors; then 2) employs a transformer-based neural architecture to find the device location from the sequence of velocities. We only use an IMU sensor, which is energy efficient and privacy preserving compared to WiFi, cameras, and other data sources. Our approach is significantly faster and achieves competitive results even compared with state-of-the-art methods that require a floorplan and run 20 to 30 times slower. We share our code, model and data at https://sachini.github.io/niloc.
Sachini Herath, David Caruso, Yasutaka Furukawa
CVPR1
2022 Single User WiFi Structure from Motion in the Wild
abstract
This paper proposes a novel motion estimation algorithm using WiFi networks and IMU sensor data in large uncontrolled environments, dubbed “WiFi Structure-from-Motion” (WiFi SfM). Given smartphone sensor data through day-to-day activities from a single user over a month, our WiFi SfM algorithm estimates smartphone motion tra-jectories and the structure of the environment represented as a WiFi radio map. The approach 1) establishes frame-to-frame correspondences based on WiFi fingerprints while exploiting our repetitive behavior patterns; 2) aligns trajectories via bundle adjustment; and 3) trains a self-supervised neural network to extract further motion constraints. We have col-lected 235 hours of smartphone data, spanning 38 days of daily activities in a university campus. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach over the competing methods with qualitative evaluations of the estimated motions and quantitative evaluations of indoor localization accuracy based on the reconstructed WiFi radio map. The WiFi SfM technology will potentially allow digital mapping companies to build better radio maps automatically by asking users to share WiFi/IMU sensor data in their daily activities.
Yiming Qian, Hang Yan 0002, Sachini Herath, Pyojin Kim, Yasutaka Furukawa
ICRA3
2021 Fusion-DHL: WiFi, IMU, and Floorplan Fusion for Dense History of Locations in Indoor Environments
abstract
The paper proposes a multi-modal sensor fusion algorithm that fuses WiFi, IMU, and floorplan information to infer an accurate and dense location history in indoor environments. The algorithm uses 1) an inertial navigation algorithm to estimate a relative motion trajectory from IMU sensor data; 2) a WiFi-based localization API in industry to obtain positional constraints and geo-localize the trajectory; and 3) a convolutional neural network to refine the location history to be consistent with the floorplan. We have developed a data acquisition app to build a new dataset with WiFi, IMU, and floorplan data with ground-truth positions at 4 university buildings and 3 shopping malls. Our qualitative and quantitative evaluations demonstrate that the proposed system is able to produce twice as accurate and a few orders of magnitude denser location history than the current standard, while requiring minimal additional energy consumption. We will publicly share our code and models.
Sachini Herath, Saghar Irandoust, Yiming Qian, Pyojin Kim, Yasutaka Furukawa
ICRA1
2020 RoNIN: Robust Neural Inertial Navigation in the Wild: Benchmark, Evaluations, & New Methods
abstract
This paper sets a new foundation for data-driven inertial navigation research, where the task is the estimation of horizontal positions and heading direction of a moving subject from a sequence of IMU sensor measurements from a phone. In contrast to existing methods, our method can handle varying phone orientations and placements.More concretely, the paper presents 1) a new benchmark containing more than 40 hours of IMU sensor data from 100 human subjects with ground-truth 3D trajectories under natural human motions; 2) novel neural inertial navigation architectures, making significant improvements for challenging motion cases; and 3) qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the competing methods over three inertial navigation benchmarks. We share the code and data to promote further research. (http://ronin.cs.sfu.ca).
Sachini Herath, Hang Yan 0002, Yasutaka Furukawa
ICRA1