In the Directed Disjoint Paths problem (k-DDP), we are given a digraph and k pairs of terminals, and the goal is to find k pairwise vertex-disjoint paths connecting each pair of terminals. Bang-Jensen and Thomassen [SIAM J. Discrete Math. 1992] claimed that k-DDP is NP-complete on tournaments, and this result triggered a very active line of research about the complexity of the problem on tournaments and natural superclasses. We identify a flaw in their proof, which has been acknowledged by the authors, and provide a new NP-completeness proof. From an algorithmic point of view, Fomin and Pilipczuk [J. Comb. Theory B 2019] provided an FPT algorithm for the edge-disjoint version of the problem on semicomplete digraphs, and showed that their technique cannot work for the vertex-disjoint version. We overcome this obstacle by showing that the version of k-DDP where we allow congestion c on the vertices is FPT on semicomplete digraphs provided that c is greater than k/2. This is based on a quite elaborate irrelevant vertex argument inspired by the edge-disjoint version, and we show that our choice of c is best possible for this technique, with a counterexample with no irrelevant vertices when c ≤ k/2. We also prove that k-DDP on digraphs that can be partitioned into h semicomplete digraphs is W[1]-hard parameterized by k+h, which shows that the XP algorithm presented by Chudnovsky, Scott, and Seymour [J. Comb. Theory B 2019] is essentially optimal.

It is well known that directed treewidth does not enjoy the nice algorithmic properties of its undirected counterpart. There exist, however, some positive results that, essentially, present XP algorithms for the problem of finding, in a given digraph D , a subdigraph isomorphic to a digraph H that can be formed by the union of k directed paths (with some extra properties), parameterized by k and the directed treewidth of D . Our motivation is to tackle the following question: Are there subdigraphs, other than the directed paths, that can be found efficiently in digraphs of bounded directed treewidth? In a nutshell, the main message of this article is that, other than the directed paths, the only digraphs that seem to behave well with respect to directed treewidth are the stars. For this, we present a number of positive and negative results, generalizing several results in the literature, as well as some directions for further research.

We present new min-max relations in digraphs between the number of paths satisfying certain conditions and the order of the corresponding cuts. We define these objects in order to capture, in the context of solving the half-integral linkage problem, the essential properties needed for reaching a large bramble of constant congestion from the terminal set. This strategy has been used ad-hoc in several articles, usually with lengthy technical proofs, and our objective is to abstract it to make it applicable in a simpler and unified way. We provide two proofs of the min-max relations, one consisting in applying Menger’s Theorem on appropriately defined digraphs, and an alternative simpler one using matroids, however with worse polynomial running time. As an application, we manage to simplify and improve several results of Edwards et al. in 2017 and of Giannopoulou et al. in 2022 about finding half-integral linkages in digraphs. Concerning the former, besides being simpler, our proof provides an almost optimal bound on the strong connectivity of a digraph for it to be half-integrally feasible under the presence of a large bramble of congestion two (or equivalently, if the directed tree-width is large). Concerning the latter, our proof uses brambles as rerouting objects instead of cylindrical grids, hence yielding much better bounds and being somehow independent of a particular topology. We hope that our min-max relations will find further applications as, in our opinion, they are simple, robust, and versatile to be easily applicable to different types of routing problems in digraphs.

Abstract Chordal graphs are the intersection graphs of subtrees of a tree, while interval graphs of subpaths of a path. Undirected path graphs, directed path graphs and rooted directed path graphs are intermediate graph classes, defined, respectively, as the intersection graphs of paths of a tree, of directed paths of an oriented tree, and of directed paths of an out branching. All of these path graphs have vertex leafage 2. Dominating Set, Connected Dominating Set, and Steiner tree problems are ‐hard parameterized by the size of the solution on chordal graphs, ‐complete on undirected path graphs, and polynomial‐time solvable on rooted directed path graphs, and hence also on interval graphs. We further investigate the (parameterized) complexity of all these problems when constrained to chordal graphs, taking the vertex leafage and the aforementioned classes into consideration. We prove that Dominating Set, Connected Dominating Set, and Steiner tree are on chordal graphs when parameterized by the size of the solution plus the vertex leafage, and that Weighted Connected Dominating Set is polynomial‐time solvable on strongly chordal graphs. We also introduce a new subclass of undirected path graphs, which we call in–out rooted directed path graphs, as the intersection graphs of directed paths of an in–out branching. We prove that Dominating Set, Connected Dominating Set, and Steiner tree are solvable in polynomial time on this class, generalizing the polynomiality for rooted directed path graphs proved by Booth and Johnson (SIAM J. Comput. 11 (1982), 191‐199.) and by White et al. (Networks 15 (1985), 109‐124.).

International audience

We introduce the notion of delineation. A graph class C is said delineated by twin-width (or simply, delineated) if for every hereditary closure D of a subclass of C, it holds that D has bounded twin-width if and only if D is monadically dependent. An effective strengthening of delineation for a class C implies that tractable FO model checking on C is perfectly understood: On hereditary closures of subclasses D of C, FO model checking on D is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) exactly when D has bounded twin-width. Ordered graphs [BGOdMSTT, STOC '22] and permutation graphs [BKTW, JACM '22] are effectively delineated, while subcubic graphs are not. On the one hand, we prove that interval graphs, and even, rooted directed path graphs are delineated. On the other hand, we observe or show that segment graphs, directed path graphs (with arbitrarily many roots), and visibility graphs of simple polygons are not delineated. In an effort to draw the delineation frontier between interval graphs (that are delineated) and axis-parallel two-lengthed segment graphs (that are not), we investigate the twin-width of restricted segment intersection classes. It was known that (triangle-free) pure axis-parallel unit segment graphs have unbounded twin-width [BGKTW, SODA '21]. We show that K_{t,t}-free segment graphs, and axis-parallel H_t-free unit segment graphs have bounded twin-width, where H_t is the half-graph or ladder of height t. In contrast, axis-parallel H₄-free two-lengthed segment graphs have unbounded twin-width. We leave as an open question whether unit segment graphs are delineated. More broadly, we explore which structures (large bicliques, half-graphs, or independent sets) are responsible for making the twin-width large on the main classes of intersection and visibility graphs. Our new results, combined with the FPT algorithm for first-order model checking on graphs given with O(1)-sequences [BKTW, JACM '22], give rise to a variety of algorithmic win-win arguments. They all fall in the same framework: If p is an FO definable graph parameter that effectively functionally upperbounds twin-width on a class C, then p(G) ⩾ k can be decided in FPT time f(k) ⋅ |V(G)|^O(1). For instance, we readily derive FPT algorithms for k-Ladder on visibility graphs of 1.5D terrains, and k-Independent Set on visibility graphs of simple polygons. This showcases that the theory of twin-width can serve outside of classes of bounded twin-width.

The grid theorem of Robertson and Seymour [ J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 41 (1986), pp. 92--114] is one of the most important tools in the field of structural graph theory, finding numerous applications in the design of algorithms for undirected graphs. An analogous version of the grid theorem in digraphs was conjectured by Johnson et al. [ J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 82 (2001), pp. 138--154] and proved by Kawarabayashi and Kreutzer [ Proceedings of STOC, 2015, pp. 655--664]. Namely, they showed that there is a function $f(k)$ such that every digraph of directed tree-width at least $f(k)$ contains a cylindrical grid of order $k$ as a butterfly minor, and stated that their proof can be turned into an \sf XP algorithm, with parameter $k$, that either constructs a decomposition of the appropriate width or finds the claimed large cylindrical grid as a butterfly minor. In this paper, we adapt some of the steps of the proof of Kawarabayashi and Kreutzer to improve this \sf XP algorithm into a fixed-parameter tractable (\sf FPT) algorithm. Toward this, our main technical contributions are two \sf FPT algorithms with parameter $k$. The first one either produces an arboreal decomposition of width $3k-2$ or finds a haven of order $k$ in a digraph $D$, improving on the original result for arboreal decompositions by Johnson et al. [ J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 82 (2001), pp. 138--154]. The second algorithm finds a well-linked set of order $k$ in a digraph $D$ of large directed tree-width. As tools to prove these results, we show how to solve a generalized version of the problem of finding balanced separators for a given set of vertices $T$ in \sf FPT time with parameter $|T|$, a result that we consider to be of its own interest.

In the Directed Disjoint Paths problem, we are given a digraph $D$ and a set of requests $\{(s_1, t_1), \ldots, (s_k, t_k)\}$, and the task is to find a collection of pairwise vertex-disjoint paths $\{P_1, \ldots, P_k\}$ such that each $P_i$ is a path from $s_i$ to $t_i$ in $D$. This problem is NP-complete for fixed $k=2$ and W[1]-hard with parameter $k$ in DAGs. A few positive results are known under restrictions on the input digraph, such as being planar or having bounded directed tree-width, or under relaxations of the problem, such as allowing for vertex congestion. Positive results are scarce, however, for general digraphs. In this article we propose a novel global congestion metric for the problem: we only require the paths to be "disjoint enough", in the sense that they must behave properly not in the whole graph, but in an unspecified part of size prescribed by a parameter. Namely, in the Disjoint Enough Directed Paths problem, given an $n$-vertex digraph $D$, a set of $k$ requests, and non-negative integers $d$ and $s$, the task is to find a collection of paths connecting the requests such that at least $d$ vertices of $D$ occur in at most $s$ paths of the collection. We study the parameterized complexity of this problem for a number of choices of the parameter, including the directed tree-width of $D$. Among other results, we show that the problem is W[1]-hard in DAGs with parameter $d$ and, on the positive side, we give an algorithm in time $\mathcal{O}(n^{d+2} \cdot k^{d\cdot s})$ and a kernel of size $d \cdot 2^{k-s}\cdot \binom{k}{s} + 2k$ in general digraphs. This latter result has consequences for the Steiner Network problem: we show that it is FPT parameterized by the number $k$ of terminals and $p$, where $p = n - q$ and $q$ is the size of the solution.