Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yanqin Cao
dblp:174/4074
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 67% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 33% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › fault attacks
differential fault analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Impossible Differential Fault Analysis on the LED Lightweight Cryptosystem in the Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2016 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptanalysis
fault analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Impossible Differential Fault Analysis on the LED Lightweight Cryptosystem in the Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2016 |
Hardware security and side channels
fault attacks |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Impossible Differential Fault Analysis on the LED Lightweight Cryptosystem in the Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2016 |
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
vehicular ad hoc networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Impossible Differential Fault Analysis on the LED Lightweight Cryptosystem in the Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
impossible differential fault analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Impossible Differential Fault Analysis on the LED Lightweight Cryptosystem in the Vehicular Ad-Hoc NetworksabstractWith the advancement and deployment of leading-edge telecommunication technologies for sensing and collecting traffic related information, the vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs) have emerged as a new application scenario that is envisioned to revolutionize the human driving experiences and traffic flow control systems. To avoid any possible malicious attack and resource abuse, employing lightweight cryptosystems is widely recognized as one of the most effective approaches for the VANETs to achieve confidentiality, integrity and authentication. As a typical substitution-permutation network lightweight cryptosystem, LED supports 64-bit and 128-bit secret keys, which are flexible to provide security for the RFID and other highly-constrained devices in the VANETs. Since its introduction, some research of fault analysis has been devoted to attacking the last three rounds of LED. It is an open problem to know whether provoking faults at a former round of LED allows recovering the secret key. In this paper, we give an answer to this problem by showing a novel impossible differential fault analysis on one round earlier of all LED keysize variants. Mathematical analysis and simulating experiments show that the attack could recover the 64-bit and 128-bit secret keys of LED by introducing 48 faults and 96 faults in average, respectively. The result in this study describes that LED is vulnerable to a half byte impossible differential fault analysis. It will be beneficial to the analysis of the same type of other iterated lightweight cryptosystems in the VANETs. Wei Li 0013, Dawu Gu, Yanqin Cao, Zhihong Zhou, Ya Liu 0001, Zhiqiang Liu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 4 |