Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Giles

dblp:174/8835 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.912025
Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural operator
0.912025
Learning Chaos In A Linear Way · ICLR 2025
Computational science and engineering
data assimilation
0.912025
Tensor-Var: Efficient Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation · ICML 2025
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
operator learning
0.912025
Learning Chaos In A Linear Way · ICLR 2025
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks
0.912025
Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification · ICML 2025
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.912025
Learning Chaos In A Linear Way · ICLR 2025
Computational science and engineering
uncertainty quantification
0.912025
Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification · ICML 2025
Computational science and engineering › data assimilation
variational data assimilation
0.912025
Tensor-Var: Efficient Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation · ICML 2025
Computational science and engineering › dynamical systems › nonlinear dynamics
chaotic dynamics
0.312025
Learning Chaos In A Linear Way · ICLR 2025
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equation solver
0.312025
Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

operator learning · 1.7neural ordinary differential equation · 1.7kernel conditional mean embedding · 1.7finite-difference stencil · 1.7deep features · 1.7convex optimization · 1.7conformal prediction · 1.7autoencoder · 1.7convolutional layers · 0.9convolutional layer · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Chaos In A Linear Way
abstract
Learning long-term behaviors in chaotic dynamical systems, such as turbulent flows and climate modelling, is challenging due to their inherent instability and unpredictability. These systems exhibit positive Lyapunov exponents, which significantly hinder accurate long-term forecasting. As a result, understanding long-term statistical behavior is far more valuable than focusing on short-term accuracy. While autoregressive deep sequence models have been applied to capture long-term behavior, they often lead to exponentially increasing errors in learned dynamics. To address this, we shift the focus from simple prediction errors to preserving an invariant measure in dissipative chaotic systems. These systems have attractors, where trajectories settle, and the invariant measure is the probability distribution on attractors that remains unchanged under dynamics. Existing methods generate long trajectories of dissipative chaotic systems by aligning invariant measures, but it is not always possible to obtain invariant measures for arbitrary datasets. We propose the Poincaré Flow Neural Network (PFNN), a novel operator learning framework designed to capture behaviors of chaotic systems without any explicit knowledge of the invariant measure. PFNN employs an auto-encoder to map the chaotic system to a finite-dimensional feature space, effectively linearizing the chaotic evolution. It then learns the linear evolution operators to match the physical dynamics by addressing two critical properties in dissipative chaotic systems: (1) contraction, the system’s convergence toward its attractors, and (2) measure invariance, trajectories on the attractors following a probability distribution invariant to the dynamics. Our experiments on a variety of chaotic systems, including Lorenz systems, Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation and Navier–Stokes equation, demonstrate that PFNN has more accurate predictions and physical statistics compared to competitive baselines including the Fourier Neural Operator and the Markov Neural Operator.
Xiaoyuan Cheng, Sibo Cheng, Daniel Giles, Xiaohang Tang, Yukun Hu
ICLR6
2025 Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification
abstract
Simulating complex physical systems is crucial for understanding and predicting phenomena across diverse fields, such as fluid dynamics and heat transfer, as well as plasma physics and structural mechanics. Traditional approaches rely on solving partial differential equations (PDEs) using numerical methods, which are computationally expensive and often prohibitively slow for real-time applications or large-scale simulations. Neural PDEs have emerged as efficient alternatives to these costly numerical solvers, offering significant computational speed-ups. However, their lack of robust uncertainty quantification (UQ) limits deployment in critical applications. We introduce a model-agnostic, physics-informed conformal prediction (CP) framework that provides guaranteed uncertainty estimates without requiring labelled data. By utilising a physics-based approach, we can quantify and calibrate the model’s inconsistencies with the physics rather than the uncertainty arising from the data. Our approach utilises convolutional layers as finite-difference stencils and leverages physics residual errors as nonconformity scores, enabling data-free UQ with marginal and joint coverage guarantees across prediction domains for a range of complex PDEs. We further validate the efficacy of our method on neural PDE models for plasma modelling and shot design in fusion reactors.
Vignesh Gopakumar, Ander Gray, Lorenzo Zanisi, Timothy Nunn, Daniel Giles, Matt J. Kusner, Stanislas Pamela, Marc Peter Deisenroth
ICML5
2025 Tensor-Var: Efficient Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation
abstract
Variational data assimilation estimates the dynamical system states by minimizing a cost function that fits the numerical models with the observational data. Although four-dimensional variational assimilation (4D-Var) is widely used, it faces high computational costs in complex nonlinear systems and depends on imperfect state-observation mappings. Deep learning (DL) offers more expressive approximators, while integrating DL models into 4D-Var is challenging due to their nonlinearities and lack of theoretical guarantees in assimilation results. In this paper, we propose \textit{Tensor-Var}, a novel framework that integrates kernel conditional mean embedding (CME) with 4D-Var to linearize nonlinear dynamics, achieving convex optimization in a learned feature space. Moreover, our method provides a new perspective for solving 4D-Var in a linear way, offering theoretical guarantees of consistent assimilation results between the original and feature spaces. To handle large-scale problems, we propose a method to learn deep features (DFs) using neural networks within the Tensor-Var framework. Experiments on chaotic systems and global weather prediction with real-time observations show that Tensor-Var outperforms conventional and DL hybrid 4D-Var baselines in accuracy while achieving a 10- to 20-fold speed improvement.
Xiaoyuan Cheng, Daniel Giles, Sibo Cheng, Boli Chen, Yukun Hu
ICML3
2023 Multilevel Bayesian Quadrature
abstract
Multilevel Monte Carlo is a key tool for approximating integrals involving expensive scientific models. The idea is to use approximations of the integrand to construct an estimator with improved accuracy over classical Monte Carlo. We propose to further enhance multilevel Monte Carlo through Bayesian surrogate models of the integrand, focusing on Gaussian process models and the associated Bayesian quadrature estimators. We show, using both theory and numerical experiments, that our approach can lead to significant improvements in accuracy when the integrand is expensive and smooth, and when the dimensionality is small or moderate. We conclude the paper with a case study illustrating the potential impact of our method in landslide-generated tsunami modelling, where the cost of each integrand evaluation is typically too large for operational settings.
Daniel Giles, Toni Karvonen, Serge Guillas, François-Xavier Briol
AISTATS2