When translating a term calculus into a graphical formalism many inessential details are abstracted away. In the case of $\lambda$-calculus translated to proof-nets, these inessential details are captured by a notion of equivalence on $\lambda$-terms known as $\simeq_\sigma$-equivalence, in both the intuitionistic (due to Regnier) and classical (due to Laurent) cases. The purpose of this paper is to uncover a strong bisimulation behind $\simeq_\sigma$-equivalence, as formulated by Laurent for Parigot's $\lambda\mu$-calculus. This is achieved by introducing a relation $\simeq$, defined over a revised presentation of $\lambda\mu$-calculus we dub $\Lambda M$. More precisely, we first identify the reasons behind Laurent's $\simeq_\sigma$-equivalence on $\lambda\mu$-terms failing to be a strong bisimulation. Inspired by Laurent's \emph{Polarized Proof-Nets}, this leads us to distinguish multiplicative and exponential reduction steps on terms. Second, we enrich the syntax of $\lambda\mu$ to allow us to track the exponential operations. These technical ingredients pave the way towards a strong bisimulation for the classical case. We introduce a calculus $\Lambda M$ and a relation $\simeq$ that we show to be a strong bisimulation with respect to reduction in $\Lambda M$, ie. two $\simeq$-equivalent terms have the exact same reduction semantics, a result which fails for Regnier's $\simeq_\sigma$-equivalence in $\lambda$-calculus as well as for Laurent's $\simeq_\sigma$-equivalence in $\lambda\mu$. Although $\simeq$ is formulated over an enriched syntax and hence is not strictly included in Laurent's $\simeq_\sigma$, we show how it can be seen as a restriction of it.

This paper explores how the intersection type theories of call-by-name (CBN) and call-by-value (CBV) can be unified in a more general framework provided by call-by-push-value (CBPV). Indeed, we propose tight type systems for CBN and CBV that can be both encoded in a unique tight type system for CBPV. All such systems are quantitative, i.e. they provide exact information about the length of normalization sequences to normal form as well as the size of these normal forms. Moreover, the length of reduction sequences are discriminated according to their multiplicative and exponential nature, a concept inherited from linear logic. Last but not least, it is possible to extract quantitative measures for CBN and CBV from their corresponding encodings in CBPV.

The purpose of this paper is to identify programs with control operators whose reduction semantics are in exact correspondence. This is achieved by introducing a relation $\simeq$, defined over a revised presentation of Parigot's $λμ$-calculus we dub $ΛM$. Our result builds on two fundamental ingredients: (1) factorization of $λμ$-reduction into multiplicative and exponential steps by means of explicit term operators of $ΛM$, and (2) translation of $ΛM$-terms into Laurent's polarized proof-nets (PPN) such that cut-elimination in PPN simulates our calculus. Our proposed relation $\simeq$ is shown to characterize structural equivalence in PPN. Most notably, $\simeq$ is shown to be a strong bisimulation with respect to reduction in $ΛM$, i.e. two $\simeq$-equivalent terms have the exact same reduction semantics, a result which fails for Regnier's $σ$-equivalence in $λ$-calculus as well as for Laurent's $σ$-equivalence in $λμ$.