Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mingyang Ling 0001
dblp:175/1410-1
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-7377-8911ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 38% Multi-agent systems · 16% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 16% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
agent planning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | COMPASS: Enhancing Agent Long-Horizon Reasoning with Evolving Context · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | COMPASS: Enhancing Agent Long-Horizon Reasoning with Evolving Context · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
LLM-based multi-agent systems |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | COMPASS: Enhancing Agent Long-Horizon Reasoning with Evolving Context · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning › multi-step reasoning
long-horizon reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | COMPASS: Enhancing Agent Long-Horizon Reasoning with Evolving Context · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scene Graph Generation With External Knowledge and Image Reconstruction · CVPR 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering › knowledge integration
external knowledge integration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scene Graph Generation With External Knowledge and Image Reconstruction · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene graph generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scene Graph Generation With External Knowledge and Image Reconstruction · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Scene Graph Generation With External Knowledge and Image Reconstruction · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
weakly supervised extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Distant IE by Bootstrapping Using Lists and Document Structure · AAAI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test-time scaling · 1.0post-training · 1.0hierarchical agent architecture · 1.0image reconstruction loss · 0.4graph model · 0.4bootstrapping · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | COMPASS: Enhancing Agent Long-Horizon Reasoning with Evolving ContextabstractLong-horizon tasks that require sustained reasoning and multiple tool interactions remain challenging for LLM agents: small errors compound across steps, and even state-of-the-art models often hallucinate or lose coherence.We identify context management as the central bottleneck-extended histories cause agents to overlook critical evidence or become distracted by irrelevant information, thus failing to replan or reflect from previous mistakes.To address this, we propose COMPASS (Context-Organized Multi-Agent Planning and Strategy System), a lightweight hierarchical framework that separates tactical execution, strategic oversight, and context organization into three specialized components: (1) a Main Agent that performs reasoning and tool use, (2) a Meta-Thinker that monitors progress and issues strategic interventions, and (3) a Context Manager that maintains concise, relevant progress briefs for different reasoning stages.Across three challenging benchmarks-GAIA, BrowseComp, and Humanity's Last Exam-COMPASS improves accuracy by up to 20% relative to both single-and multi-agent baselines.We further introduce a test-time scaling extension that elevates performance to match established DeepResearch agents, and a posttraining pipeline that delegates context management to smaller models for enhanced efficiency. Guangya Wan, Mingyang Ling 0001, Xiaoqi Ren, Rujun Han, Sheng Li 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Scene Graph Generation With External Knowledge and Image ReconstructionabstractScene graph generation has received growing attention with the advancements in image understanding tasks such as object detection, attributes and relationship prediction, etc. However, existing datasets are biased in terms of object and relationship labels, or often come with noisy and missing annotations, which makes the development of a reliable scene graph prediction model very challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel scene graph generation algorithm with external knowledge and image reconstruction loss to overcome these dataset issues. In particular, we extract commonsense knowledge from the external knowledge base to refine object and phrase features for improving generalizability in scene graph generation. To address the bias of noisy object annotations, we introduce an auxiliary image reconstruction path to regularize the scene graph generation network. Extensive experiments show that our framework can generate better scene graphs, achieving the state-of-the-art performance on two benchmark datasets: Visual Relationship Detection and Visual Genome datasets. Jiuxiang Gu, Handong Zhao, Zhe Lin 0001, Sheng Li 0001, Jianfei Cai 0001, Mingyang Ling 0001 |
CVPR | 6 |
| 2016 | Distant IE by Bootstrapping Using Lists and Document StructureabstractDistant labeling for information extraction (IE) suffers from noisy training data. We describe a way of reducing the noise associated with distant IE by identifying coupling constraints between potential instance labels. As one example of coupling,items in a list are likely to have the same label.A second example of coupling comes from analysis of document structure: in some corpora,sections can be identified such that items in the same section are likely to have the same label. Such sections do not exist in all corpora, but we show that augmenting a large corpus with coupling constraints from even a small, well-structured corpus can improve performance substantially, doubling F1 on one task. Lidong Bing, Mingyang Ling 0001, Richard C. Wang, William W. Cohen |
AAAI | 2 |