Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zita Marinho

dblp:175/1420 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6314-6096ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Reinforcement learning · 41% Language models and text generation · 22% Machine translation · 6%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 61% Program synthesis and code generation · 39%

Topics — the 27 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
1.122022
Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2022
Self-Consistent Models and Values · NeurIPS 2021
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.912025
AuPair: Golden Example Pairs for Code Repair · ICML 2025
Debugging and program repair › automated program repair
LLM-based program repair
0.912025
AuPair: Golden Example Pairs for Code Repair · ICML 2025
Debugging and program repair
program repair
0.912025
AuPair: Golden Example Pairs for Code Repair · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.612022
Chunk-based Nearest Neighbor Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.612022
Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
long-context language modeling
0.612022
∞-former: Infinite Memory Transformer · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
retrieval-augmented machine translation
0.612022
Chunk-based Nearest Neighbor Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.612022
Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.612022
Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation
0.512021
Self-Consistent Models and Values · NeurIPS 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-consistency
0.512021
Self-Consistent Models and Values · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function estimation
0.512021
Self-Consistent Models and Values · NeurIPS 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding and sampling
0.412020
Sparse Text Generation · EMNLP (1) 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
sparse sampling
0.412020
Sparse Text Generation · EMNLP (1) 2020
Information retrieval
fact-checking
0.412019
Automated Fact Checking in the News Room · WWW 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning
0.312018
Recurrent Predictive State Policy Networks · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient
0.312018
Recurrent Predictive State Policy Networks · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation
0.312018
Recurrent Predictive State Policy Networks · ICML 2018
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
in-context learning
0.312025
AuPair: Golden Example Pairs for Code Repair · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
method of moments
0.212016
Semi-Supervised Learning of Sequence Models with Method of Moments · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.212016
Semi-Supervised Learning of Sequence Models with Method of Moments · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.212022
∞-former: Infinite Memory Transformer · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.212022
Chunk-based Nearest Neighbor Machine Translation · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
distribution comparison
0.112020
Sparse Text Generation · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › fact-checking
evidence retrieval
0.112019
Automated Fact Checking in the News Room · WWW 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.112016
Semi-Supervised Learning of Sequence Models with Method of Moments · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-repair · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9best-of-n sampling · 0.9value-based planning · 0.6sticky memories · 0.6semiparametric modeling · 0.6k-nearest neighbor retrieval · 0.6implicit value ensemble · 0.6continuous-space attention · 0.6bootstrapping · 0.6self-consistency updates · 0.5dyna · 0.5entmax transformation · 0.4user study · 0.4textual entailment · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AuPair: Golden Example Pairs for Code Repair
abstract
Scaling up inference-time compute has proven to be a valuable strategy in improving the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) without fine-tuning. An important task that can benefit from additional inference-time compute is self-repair; given an initial flawed response or guess, the LLM corrects its own mistake and produces an improved response or fix. We leverage the in-context learning ability of LLMs to perform self-repair in the coding domain. The key contribution of our paper is an approach that synthesises and selects an ordered set of golden example pairs, or AuPairs, of these initial guesses and subsequent fixes for the corresponding problems. Each such AuPair is provided as a single in-context example at inference time to generate a repaired solution. For an inference-time compute budget of $N$ LLM calls per problem, $N$ AuPairs are used to generate $N$ repaired solutions, out of which the highest-scoring solution is the final answer. The underlying intuition is that if the LLM is given a different example of fixing an incorrect guess each time, it can subsequently generate a diverse set of repaired solutions. Our algorithm selects these AuPairs in a manner that maximises complementarity and usefulness. We demonstrate the results of our algorithm on 5 LLMs across 7 competitive programming datasets for the code repair task. Our algorithm yields a significant boost in performance compared to best-of-$N$ and self-repair, and also exhibits strong generalisation across datasets and models. Moreover, our approach shows stronger scaling with inference-time compute budget compared to baselines.
Aditi Mavalankar, Hassan Mansoor, Zita Marinho, Masha Samsikova, Tom Schaul
ICML3
2022 ∞-former: Infinite Memory Transformer
abstract
Transformers are unable to model long-term memories effectively, since the amount of computation they need to perform grows with the context length. While variations of efficient transformers have been proposed, they all have a finite memory capacity and are forced to drop old information. In this paper, we propose the ∞-former, which extends the vanilla transformer with an unbounded long-term memory. By making use of a continuous-space attention mechanism to attend over the long-term memory, the ∞-former's attention complexity becomes independent of the context length, trading off memory length with precision.In order to control where precision is more important, ∞-former maintains "sticky memories," being able to model arbitrarily long contexts while keeping the computation budget fixed.Experiments on a synthetic sorting task, language modeling, and document grounded dialogue generation demonstrate the ∞-former's ability to retain information from long sequences.
Pedro Henrique Martins, Zita Marinho, André F. T. Martins
ACL (1)2
2022 Chunk-based Nearest Neighbor Machine Translation
abstract
Semi-parametric models, which augment generation with retrieval, have led to impressive results in language modeling and machine translation, due to their ability to retrieve fine-grained information from a datastore of examples.One of the most prominent approaches, kNN-MT, exhibits strong domain adaptation capabilities by retrieving tokens from domain-specific datastores (Khandelwal et al., 2021).However, kNN-MT requires an expensive retrieval operation for every single generated token, leading to a very low decoding speed (around 8 times slower than a parametric model).In this paper, we introduce a chunk-based kNN-MT model which retrieves chunks of tokens from the datastore, instead of a single token.We propose several strategies for incorporating the retrieved chunks into the generation process, and for selecting the steps at which the model needs to search for neighbors in the datastore.Experiments on machine translation in two settings, static and "on-the-fly" domain adaptation, show that the chunk-based kNN-MT model leads to significant speed-ups (up to 4 times) with only a small drop in translation quality. 1
Pedro Henrique Martins, Zita Marinho, André F. T. Martins
EMNLP2
2022 Model-Value Inconsistency as a Signal for Epistemic Uncertainty
abstract
Using a model of the environment and a value function, an agent can construct many estimates of a state’s value, by unrolling the model for different lengths and bootstrapping with its value function. Our key insight is that one can treat this set of value estimates as a type of ensemble, which we call an implicit value ensemble (IVE). Consequently, the discrepancy between these estimates can be used as a proxy for the agent’s epistemic uncertainty; we term this signal model-value inconsistency or self-inconsistency for short. Unlike prior work which estimates uncertainty by training an ensemble of many models and/or value functions, this approach requires only the single model and value function which are already being learned in most model-based reinforcement learning algorithms. We provide empirical evidence in both tabular and function approximation settings from pixels that self-inconsistency is useful (i) as a signal for exploration, (ii) for acting safely under distribution shifts, and (iii) for robustifying value-based planning with a learned model.
Angelos Filos, Eszter Vértes, Zita Marinho, Gregory Farquhar, Diana Borsa, Abram L. Friesen, Feryal M. P. Behbahani, Tom Schaul, André Barreto 0001, Simon Osindero
ICML3
2021 Sparse And Structured Visual Attention
abstract
Visual attention mechanisms are widely used in multimodal tasks, as visual question answering (VQA). One drawback of softmax-based attention mechanisms is that they assign some probability mass to all image regions, regardless of their adjacency structure and of their relevance to the text. In this paper, to better link the image structure with the text, we replace the traditional softmax attention mechanism with two alternative sparsity-promoting transformations: sparsemax, which is able to select only the relevant regions (assigning zero weight to the rest), and a newly proposed Total-Variation Sparse Attention (TVMAX), which further encourages the joint selection of adjacent spatial locations. Experiments in VQA show gains in accuracy as well as higher similarity to human attention, which suggests better interpretability.
Pedro Henrique Martins, Vlad Niculae, Zita Marinho, André F. T. Martins
ICIP3
2021 Self-Consistent Models and Values
abstract
Learned models of the environment provide reinforcement learning (RL) agents with flexible ways of making predictions about the environment.Models enable planning, i.e. using more computation to improve value functions or policies, without requiring additional environment interactions.In this work, we investigate a way of augmenting model-based RL, by additionally encouraging a learned model and value function to be jointly \emph{self-consistent}.This lies in contrast to classic planning methods like Dyna, which only update the value function to be consistent with the model.We propose a number of possible self-consistency updates, study them empirically in both the tabular and function approximation settings, and find that with appropriate choices self-consistency can be useful both for policy evaluation and control.
Gregory Farquhar, Kate Baumli, Zita Marinho, Angelos Filos, Matteo Hessel, Hado van Hasselt, David Silver 0001
NeurIPS3
2020 Sparse Text Generation
abstract
Current state-of-the-art text generators build on powerful language models such as GPT-2, achieving impressive performance.However, to avoid degenerate text, they require sampling from a modified softmax, via temperature parameters or ad-hoc truncation techniques, as in top-k or nucleus sampling.This creates a mismatch between training and testing conditions.In this paper, we use the recently introduced entmax transformation to train and sample from a natively sparse language model, avoiding this mismatch.The result is a text generator with favorable performance in terms of fluency and consistency, fewer repetitions, and n-gram diversity closer to human text.In order to evaluate our model, we propose three new metrics for comparing sparse or truncated distributions: -perplexity, sparsemax score, and Jensen-Shannon divergence.Human-evaluated experiments in story completion and dialogue generation show that entmax sampling leads to more engaging and coherent stories and conversations.
Pedro Henrique Martins, Zita Marinho, André F. T. Martins
EMNLP (1)2
2019 Automated Fact Checking in the News Room
abstract
Fact checking is an essential task in journalism; its importance has been highlighted due to recently increased concerns and efforts in combating misinformation. In this paper, we present an automated fact checking platform which given a claim, it retrieves relevant textual evidence from a document collection, predicts whether each piece of evidence supports or refutes the claim, and returns a final verdict. We describe the architecture of the system and the user interface, focusing on the choices made to improve its user friendliness and transparency. We conduct a user study of the fact-checking platform in a journalistic setting: we integrated it with a collection of news articles and provide an evaluation of the platform using feedback from journalists in their workflow. We found that the predictions of our platform were correct 58% of the time, and 59% of the returned evidence was relevant.
Sebastião Miranda, David Nogueira, Afonso Mendes, Andreas Vlachos 0001, Andrew Secker, Rebecca Garrett, Jeff Mitchell 0001, Zita Marinho
WWW8
2018 Recurrent Predictive State Policy Networks
abstract
We introduce Recurrent Predictive State Policy(RPSP) networks, a recurrent architecture that brings insights from predictive state representations to reinforcement learning in partially ob-servable environments. Predictive state policy networks consist of a recursive filter, which keeps track of a belief about the state of the environment, and a reactive policy that directly maps beliefs to actions, to maximize the cumulative reward. The recursive filter leverages predictive state representations (PSRs) (Rosencrantz & Gordon, 2004; Sun et al., 2016) by modeling predictive state{—}a prediction of the distribution of future observations conditioned on history and future actions.This representation gives rise to a rich class of statistically consistent algorithms (Hefny et al.,2017) to initialize the recursive filter. Predictive stats serves as an equivalent representation of a belief state. Therefore, the policy component of the RPSP-network can be purely reactive, simplifying training while still allowing optimal behavior. Moreover, we use the PSR interpretation during training as well, by incorporating prediction error in the loss function. The entire network (recursive filter and reactive policy) is still differentiable and can be trained using gradient-based methods. We optimize our policy using a combination of policy gradient based on rewards (Williams, 1992)and gradient descent based on prediction error.We show the efficacy of RPSP-networks on a set of robotic control tasks from OpenAI Gym. We empirically show that RPSP-networks perform well compared with memory-preserving networks such as GRUs, as well as finite memory models, being the overall best performing method.
Ahmed Hefny, Zita Marinho, Wen Sun 0002, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa, Geoffrey J. Gordon
ICML2
2016 Semi-Supervised Learning of Sequence Models with Method of Moments
abstract
We propose a fast and scalable method for semi-supervised learning of sequence models, based on anchor words and moment matching. Our method can handle hidden Markov models with feature-based log-linear emissions. Unlike other semi-supervised methods, no decoding passes are necessary on the unlabeled data and no graph needs to be constructed— only one pass is necessary to collect moment statistics. The model parameters are estimated by solving a small quadratic program for each feature. Experiments on part-of-speech (POS) tagging for Twitter and for a low-resource language (Malagasy) show that our method can learn from very few annotated sentences.
Zita Marinho, André F. T. Martins, Shay B. Cohen, Noah A. Smith
EMNLP1