Mark Granroth-Wilding

dblp:175/1521 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6020-5687ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 75% Information extraction and text analysis · 12% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.812024
CompanyKG: A Large-Scale Heterogeneous Graph for Company Similarity Quantification · KDD 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding
0.812024
CompanyKG: A Large-Scale Heterogeneous Graph for Company Similarity Quantification · KDD 2024
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
heterogeneous information network
0.812024
CompanyKG: A Large-Scale Heterogeneous Graph for Company Similarity Quantification · KDD 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis
event prediction
0.212016
What Happens Next? Event Prediction Using a Compositional Neural Network Model · AAAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
narrative cloze
0.212016
What Happens Next? Event Prediction Using a Compositional Neural Network Model · AAAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

word embeddings · 0.2vector addition · 0.2compositional neural network · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CompanyKG: A Large-Scale Heterogeneous Graph for Company Similarity Quantification
abstract
In the investment industry, it is often essential to carry out fine-grained company similarity quantification for a range of purposes, including market mapping, competitor analysis, and mergers and acquisitions. We propose and publish a knowledge graph, named CompanyKG, to represent and learn diverse company features and relations. Specifically, 1.17 million companies are represented as nodes enriched with company description embeddings; and 15 different inter-company relations result in 51.06 million weighted edges. To enable a comprehensive assessment of methods for company similarity quantification, we have devised and compiled three evaluation tasks with annotated test sets: similarity prediction, competitor retrieval and similarity ranking. We present extensive benchmarking results for 11 reproducible predictive methods categorized into three groups: node-only, edge-only, and node+edge. To the best of our knowledge, CompanyKG is the first large-scale heterogeneous graph dataset originating from a real-world investment platform, tailored for quantifying inter-company similarity
Le-le Cao, Vilhelm von Ehrenheim, Mark Granroth-Wilding, Richard Anselmo Stahl, Andrew McCornack, Armin Catovic, Dhiana Deva Cavalcanti Rocha
IEEE Trans. Big Data3
2024 CompanyKG: A Large-Scale Heterogeneous Graph for Company Similarity Quantification
abstract
This paper presents CompanyKG (version 2), a large-scale heterogeneous graph developed for fine-grained company similarity quantification and relationship prediction, crucial for applications in the investment industry such as market mapping, competitor analysis, and mergers and acquisitions.CompanyKG comprises 1.17 million companies represented as graph nodes, enriched with company description embeddings, and 51.06 million weighted edges
Le-le Cao, Vilhelm von Ehrenheim, Mark Granroth-Wilding, Richard Anselmo Stahl, Andrew McCornack, Armin Catovic, Dhiana Deva Cavalcanti Rocha
KDD3
2020 Personal Research Assistant for Online Exploration of Historical News
Lidia Pivovarova, Axel Jean-Caurant, Jari Avikainen, Khalid Al-Najjar, Mark Granroth-Wilding, Leo Leppänen, Elaine Zosa, Hannu Toivonen
ECIR (2)5
2020 CoSimLex: A Resource for Evaluating Graded Word Similarity in Context
abstract
State of the art natural language processing tools are built on context-dependent word embeddings, but no direct method for evaluating these representations currently exists. Standard tasks and datasets for intrinsic evaluation of embeddings are based on judgements of similarity, but ignore context; standard tasks for word sense disambiguation take account of context but do not provide continuous measures of meaning similarity. This paper describes an effort to build a new dataset, CoSimLex, intended to fill this gap. Building on the standard pairwise similarity task of SimLex-999, it provides context-dependent similarity measures; covers not only discrete differences in word sense but more subtle, graded changes in meaning; and covers not only a well-resourced language (English) but a number of less-resourced languages. We define the task and evaluation metrics, outline the dataset collection methodology, and describe the status of the dataset so far.
Carlos Santos Armendariz, Matthew Purver, Matej Ulcar, Senja Pollak, Nikola Ljubesic, Mark Granroth-Wilding
LREC6
2017 Data-Driven News Generation for Automated Journalism
abstract
Despite increasing amounts of data and ever improving natural language generation techniques, work on automated journalism is still relatively scarce.In this paper, we explore the field and challenges associated with building a journalistic natural language generation system.We present a set of requirements that should guide system design, including transparency, accuracy, modifiability and transferability.Guided by the requirements, we present a data-driven architecture for automated journalism that is largely domain and language independent.We illustrate its practical application in the production of news articles upon a user request about the 2017 Finnish municipal elections in three languages, demonstrating the successfulness of the data-driven, modular approach of the design.We then draw some lessons for future automated journalism.
Leo Leppänen, Myriam Munezero, Mark Granroth-Wilding, Hannu Toivonen
INLG3
2016 What Happens Next? Event Prediction Using a Compositional Neural Network Model
abstract
We address the problem of automatically acquiring knowledge of event sequences from text, with the aim of providing a predictive model for use in narrative generation systems. We present a neural network model that simultaneously learns embeddings for words describing events, a function to compose the embeddings into a representation of the event, and a coherence function to predict the strength of association between two events. We introduce a new development of the narrative cloze evaluation task, better suited to a setting where rich information about events is available. We compare models that learn vector-space representations of the events denoted by verbs in chains centering on a single protagonist. We find that recent work on learning vector-space embeddings to capture word meaning can be effectively applied to this task, including simple incorporation of a verb's arguments in the representation by vector addition. These representations provide a good initialization for learning the richer, compositional model of events with a neural network, vastly outperforming a number of baselines and competitive alternatives.
Mark Granroth-Wilding, Stephen Clark
AAAI1
2016 Meta4meaning: Automatic Metaphor Interpretation Using Corpus-Derived Word Associations
Ping Xiao, Khalid Al-Najjar, Mark Granroth-Wilding, Kat Agres, Hannu Toivonen
ICCC3
2014 Baseline Methods for Automated Fictional Ideation
Maria Teresa Llano, Rose Hepworth, Simon Colton, Jeremy Gow, John William Charnley, Nada Lavrac, Martin Znidarsic, Matic Perovsek, Mark Granroth-Wilding, Stephen Clark
ICCC9