Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pingfan Tang

dblp:175/1758 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 27% Computational geometry · 27% Approximation and online algorithms · 16%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory
distance oracle
0.412020
Sketched MinDist · SoCG 2020
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
geometric approximation
0.412020
Sketched MinDist · SoCG 2020
Computational geometry
geometric data structures
0.412020
Sketched MinDist · SoCG 2020
Algorithms and data structures
sketching
0.412020
Sketched MinDist · SoCG 2020
Computational geometry › combinatorial geometry
range space
0.312018
Approximating the Distribution of the Median and other Robust Estimators on Uncertain Data · SoCG 2018
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
uncertain data
0.312018
Approximating the Distribution of the Median and other Robust Estimators on Uncertain Data · SoCG 2018
Computational complexity › learning theory
VC dimension
0.312018
Approximating the Distribution of the Median and other Robust Estimators on Uncertain Data · SoCG 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
breakdown point
0.212016
The Robustness of Estimator Composition · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical robustness
0.212016
The Robustness of Estimator Composition · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation
0.112016
The Robustness of Estimator Composition · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

breakdown point analysis · 0.5approximation algorithm · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Sketched MinDist
abstract
We consider sketch vectors of geometric objects $J$ through the \mindist function \[ v_i(J) = \inf_{p \in J} \|p-q_i\| \] for $q_i \in Q$ from a point set $Q$. Collecting the vector of these sketch values induces a simple, effective, and powerful distance: the Euclidean distance between these sketched vectors. This paper shows how large this set $Q$ needs to be under a variety of shapes and scenarios. For hyperplanes we provide direct connection to the sensitivity sample framework, so relative error can be preserved in $d$ dimensions using $Q = O(d/\varepsilon^2)$. However, for other shapes, we show we need to enforce a minimum distance parameter $ρ$, and a domain size $L$. For $d=2$ the sample size $Q$ then can be $\tilde{O}((L/ρ) \cdot 1/\varepsilon^2)$. For objects (e.g., trajectories) with at most $k$ pieces this can provide stronger \emph{for all} approximations with $\tilde{O}((L/ρ)\cdot k^3 / \varepsilon^2)$ points. Moreover, with similar size bounds and restrictions, such trajectories can be reconstructed exactly using only these sketch vectors.
Jeff M. Phillips, Pingfan Tang
SoCG2
2019 Simple Distances for Trajectories via Landmarks
abstract
We develop a new class of distances for trajectories, based on the distance to a set of landmarks. These distances easily and interpretably map objects to a Euclidean space, are simple to compute, and perform well in data analysis tasks. For trajectories, they match and in some cases significantly out-perform all state-of-the-art other metrics, can effortlessly be used in k-means clustering, and directly plugged into approximate nearest neighbor approaches which immediately out-perform the best recent advances in trajectory similarity search by several orders of magnitude. These distances do not require complicated alignment (common in trajectory case). We show reasonable and often simple conditions under which these distances are metrics.
Jeff M. Phillips, Pingfan Tang
SIGSPATIAL/GIS2
2018 Approximating the Distribution of the Median and other Robust Estimators on Uncertain Data
abstract
Robust estimators, like the median of a point set, are important for data analysis in the presence of outliers. We study robust estimators for locationally uncertain points with discrete distributions. That is, each point in a data set has a discrete probability distribution describing its location. The probabilistic nature of uncertain data makes it challenging to compute such estimators, since the true value of the estimator is now described by a distribution rather than a single point. We show how to construct and estimate the distribution of the median of a point set. Building the approximate support of the distribution takes near-linear time, and assigning probability to that support takes quadratic time. We also develop a general approximation technique for distributions of robust estimators with respect to ranges with bounded VC dimension. This includes the geometric median for high dimensions and the Siegel estimator for linear regression.
Kevin Buchin, Jeff M. Phillips, Pingfan Tang
SoCG3
2016 The Robustness of Estimator Composition
abstract
We formalize notions of robustness for composite estimators via the notion of a breakdown point. A composite estimator successively applies two (or more) estimators: on data decomposed into disjoint parts, it applies the first estimator on each part, then the second estimator on the outputs of the first estimator. And so on, if the composition is of more than two estimators. Informally, the breakdown point is the minimum fraction of data points which if significantly modified will also significantly modify the output of the estimator, so it is typically desirable to have a large breakdown point. Our main result shows that, under mild conditions on the individual estimators, the breakdown point of the composite estimator is the product of the breakdown points of the individual estimators. We also demonstrate several scenarios, ranging from regression to statistical testing, where this analysis is easy to apply, useful in understanding worst case robustness, and sheds powerful insights onto the associated data analysis.
Pingfan Tang, Jeff M. Phillips
NIPS1