Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pingfan Tang
dblp:175/1758
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 27% Computational geometry · 27% Approximation and online algorithms · 16% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory
distance oracle |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sketched MinDist · SoCG 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
geometric approximation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sketched MinDist · SoCG 2020 |
Computational geometry
geometric data structures |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sketched MinDist · SoCG 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures
sketching |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Sketched MinDist · SoCG 2020 |
Computational geometry › combinatorial geometry
range space |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Approximating the Distribution of the Median and other Robust Estimators on Uncertain Data · SoCG 2018 |
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
uncertain data |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Approximating the Distribution of the Median and other Robust Estimators on Uncertain Data · SoCG 2018 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
VC dimension |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Approximating the Distribution of the Median and other Robust Estimators on Uncertain Data · SoCG 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
breakdown point |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Robustness of Estimator Composition · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Robustness of Estimator Composition · NIPS 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | The Robustness of Estimator Composition · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
breakdown point analysis · 0.5approximation algorithm · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Sketched MinDistabstractWe consider sketch vectors of geometric objects $J$ through the \mindist function \[ v_i(J) = \inf_{p \in J} \|p-q_i\| \] for $q_i \in Q$ from a point set $Q$. Collecting the vector of these sketch values induces a simple, effective, and powerful distance: the Euclidean distance between these sketched vectors. This paper shows how large this set $Q$ needs to be under a variety of shapes and scenarios. For hyperplanes we provide direct connection to the sensitivity sample framework, so relative error can be preserved in $d$ dimensions using $Q = O(d/\varepsilon^2)$. However, for other shapes, we show we need to enforce a minimum distance parameter $ρ$, and a domain size $L$. For $d=2$ the sample size $Q$ then can be $\tilde{O}((L/ρ) \cdot 1/\varepsilon^2)$. For objects (e.g., trajectories) with at most $k$ pieces this can provide stronger \emph{for all} approximations with $\tilde{O}((L/ρ)\cdot k^3 / \varepsilon^2)$ points. Moreover, with similar size bounds and restrictions, such trajectories can be reconstructed exactly using only these sketch vectors. Jeff M. Phillips, Pingfan Tang |
SoCG | 2 |
| 2019 | Simple Distances for Trajectories via LandmarksabstractWe develop a new class of distances for trajectories, based on the distance to a set of landmarks. These distances easily and interpretably map objects to a Euclidean space, are simple to compute, and perform well in data analysis tasks. For trajectories, they match and in some cases significantly out-perform all state-of-the-art other metrics, can effortlessly be used in k-means clustering, and directly plugged into approximate nearest neighbor approaches which immediately out-perform the best recent advances in trajectory similarity search by several orders of magnitude. These distances do not require complicated alignment (common in trajectory case). We show reasonable and often simple conditions under which these distances are metrics. Jeff M. Phillips, Pingfan Tang |
SIGSPATIAL/GIS | 2 |
| 2018 | Approximating the Distribution of the Median and other Robust Estimators on Uncertain DataabstractRobust estimators, like the median of a point set, are important for data analysis in the presence of outliers. We study robust estimators for locationally uncertain points with discrete distributions. That is, each point in a data set has a discrete probability distribution describing its location. The probabilistic nature of uncertain data makes it challenging to compute such estimators, since the true value of the estimator is now described by a distribution rather than a single point. We show how to construct and estimate the distribution of the median of a point set. Building the approximate support of the distribution takes near-linear time, and assigning probability to that support takes quadratic time. We also develop a general approximation technique for distributions of robust estimators with respect to ranges with bounded VC dimension. This includes the geometric median for high dimensions and the Siegel estimator for linear regression. Kevin Buchin, Jeff M. Phillips, Pingfan Tang |
SoCG | 3 |
| 2016 | The Robustness of Estimator CompositionabstractWe formalize notions of robustness for composite estimators via the notion of a breakdown point. A composite estimator successively applies two (or more) estimators: on data decomposed into disjoint parts, it applies the first estimator on each part, then the second estimator on the outputs of the first estimator. And so on, if the composition is of more than two estimators. Informally, the breakdown point is the minimum fraction of data points which if significantly modified will also significantly modify the output of the estimator, so it is typically desirable to have a large breakdown point. Our main result shows that, under mild conditions on the individual estimators, the breakdown point of the composite estimator is the product of the breakdown points of the individual estimators. We also demonstrate several scenarios, ranging from regression to statistical testing, where this analysis is easy to apply, useful in understanding worst case robustness, and sheds powerful insights onto the associated data analysis. Pingfan Tang, Jeff M. Phillips |
NIPS | 1 |