Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sandeep Kumar Dhanda

dblp:175/1966 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-1381-7434ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
epitope analysis
0.312018
ImmunomeBrowser: a tool to aggregate and visualize complex and heterogeneous epitopes in reference proteins · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
immunoinformatics
0.312018
ImmunomeBrowser: a tool to aggregate and visualize complex and heterogeneous epitopes in reference proteins · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

response frequency scoring · 0.3confidence interval estimation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Not all T cell epitopes are equally desired: a review of in silico tools for the prediction of cytokine-inducing potential of T-cell epitopes
abstract
Assessment of protective or harmful T cell response induced by any antigenic epitope is important in designing any immunotherapeutic molecule. The understanding of cytokine induction potential also helps us to monitor antigen-specific cellular immune responses and rational vaccine design. The classical immunoinformatics tools served well for prediction of B cell and T cell epitopes. However, in the last decade, the prediction algorithms for T cell epitope inducing specific cytokines have also been developed and appreciated in the scientific community. This review summarizes the current status of such tools, their applications, background algorithms, their use in experimental setup and functionalities available in the tools/web servers.
Sandeep Kumar Dhanda, Jitendra Malviya, Sudheer Gupta
Briefings Bioinform.1
2018 ImmunomeBrowser: a tool to aggregate and visualize complex and heterogeneous epitopes in reference proteins
abstract
Motivation: Datasets that are derived from different studies (e.g. MHC ligand elution, MHC binding, B/T cell epitope screening etc.) often vary in terms of experimental approaches, sizes of peptides tested, including partial and or nested overlapping peptides and in the number of donors tested. Results: We present a customized application of the Immune Epitope Database's ImmunomeBrowser tool, which can be used to effectively aggregate and visualize heterogeneous immunological data. User provided peptide sets and associated response data is mapped to a user-provided protein reference sequence. The output consists of tables and figures representing the aggregated data represented by a Response Frequency score and associated estimated confidence interval. This allows the user to visualizing regions associated with dominant responses and their boundaries. The results are presented both as a user interactive javascript based web interface and a tabular format in a selected reference sequence. Availability and implementation: The 'ImmunomeBrowser' has been a longstanding feature of the IEDB (http://www.iedb.org). The present application extends the use of this tool to work with user-provided datasets, rather than the output of IEDB queries. This new server version of the ImmunomeBrowser is freely accessible at http://tools.iedb.org/immunomebrowser/.
Sandeep Kumar Dhanda, Randi Vita, Brendan Ha, Alba Grifoni, Björn Peters, Alessandro Sette
Bioinform.1
2017 Novel in silico tools for designing peptide-based subunit vaccines and immunotherapeutics
abstract
The conventional approach for designing vaccine against a particular disease involves stimulation of the immune system using the whole pathogen responsible for the disease. In the post-genomic era, a major challenge is to identify antigenic regions or epitopes that can stimulate different arms of the immune system. In the past two decades, numerous methods and databases have been developed for designing vaccine or immunotherapy against various pathogen-causing diseases. This review describes various computational resources important for designing subunit vaccines or epitope-based immunotherapy. First, different immunological databases are described that maintain epitopes, antigens and vaccine targets. This is followed by in silico tools used for predicting linear and conformational B-cell epitopes required for activating humoral immunity. Finally, information on T-cell epitope prediction methods is provided that includes indirect methods like prediction of Major Histocompatibility Complex and transporter-associated protein binders. Different studies for validating the predicted epitopes are also examined critically. This review enlists novel in silico resources and tools available for predicting humoral and cell-mediated immune potential. These predicted epitopes could be used for designing epitope-based vaccines or immunotherapy as they may activate the adaptive immunity. Authors emphasized the need to develop tools for the prediction of adjuvants to activate innate and adaptive immune system simultaneously. In addition, attention has also been given to novel prediction methods to predict general therapeutic properties of peptides like half-life, cytotoxicity and immune toxicity.
Sandeep Kumar Dhanda, Salman Sadullah Usmani, Piyush Agrawal, Gandharva Nagpal, Ankur Gautam, Gajendra P. S. Raghava
Briefings Bioinform.1