Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sean Shao Wei Lam

dblp:175/4441 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Image recognition and object detection · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interactive explanation
0.912025
AI-Assisted Triage and Decision Support of Head and Neck Cancer Screening and Diagnosis in Low-Resourced Settings · IJCAI 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.912025
AI-Assisted Triage and Decision Support of Head and Neck Cancer Screening and Diagnosis in Low-Resourced Settings · IJCAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
AI-Assisted Triage and Decision Support of Head and Neck Cancer Screening and Diagnosis in Low-Resourced Settings · IJCAI 2025
Medical and health informatics › oncology
cancer screening
0.912025
AI-Assisted Triage and Decision Support of Head and Neck Cancer Screening and Diagnosis in Low-Resourced Settings · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 1.7uncertainty quantification · 1.7YOLOv5 · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AI-Assisted Triage and Decision Support of Head and Neck Cancer Screening and Diagnosis in Low-Resourced Settings
abstract
The mortality burden of head and neck cancer (HNC) is increasing globally and disproportionately affects people in low-and middle-income countries with limited medical workforce. To address this issue, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are increasingly being explored to process medical imaging data, demonstrating competitive performance. However, the clinical adoption of AI remains challenging as clinicians struggle to understand how complex AI works and trust it to use in practice. In addition, AI may not perform well on varying data qualities of endoscopy videos for HNC screening and diagnosis from multiple sites. In this project, our international and interdisciplinary team will collaborate with clinicians from multiple sites (e.g. Singapore, the U.S., and Bangladesh) to collect a diverse, multi-site dataset. In addition, we aim to design and develop computational techniques and practices to improve collaborations between clinicians and AI for the triage and diagnosis of HNC. Specifically, these techniques include a YOLOv5-based glottis detector, a classifier of patient's status using clinical endoscopy videos, uncertainty quantification techniques, and interactive Vision Language Model-based AI explanations, which will enable clinicians to understand AI outputs and provide their inputs to improve AI. After developing our system, we will evaluate the effectiveness of these computational techniques in enabling AI-assisted point-of-care triage and decision-support for HNC, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Min Hun Lee, Sean Shao Wei Lam, Shaun Xin Hong Liew, Michael Dorosan, Nicholas Graves, Jonas Karlström, Hiang Khoon Tan, Walter Tsong Lee
IJCAI2
2019 Explainable AI: Classification of MRI Brain Scans Orders for Quality Improvement
abstract
The American College of Radiology (ACR) has guidelines on appropriate ordering of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) brain scans. MRI requests are currently manually reviewed by radiologists to ensure compliance to these guidelines. In this paper, we implemented a stacked recurrent neural network (RNN) utilizing a bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) sequence with BioWordVec, a biomedical word embedding vector that uses word representations from a lexicon developed from medical publications, to develop an automated classification system for request audit. To overcome the problems of interpretation by black-box models, the RNN is integrated with a model agnostic explainer LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) to provide explainable support for clinicians in the healthcare environment. The performance of the RNN is compared with a Random Forest (RF) algorithm that utilizes the bag-of-words concept. The RNN was trained and validated on 2470 rows of different patient free-text orders and tested on a separate 2711 orders, producing an accuracy of 82.51% and a ROC value of 0.89 which was either comparable to or surpassing RF both in performance and usability. The use of deep learning with explainable LIME in this study provided a good use case towards an augmented decision-making framework in healthcare.
Alwin Yaoxian Zhang, Sean Shao Wei Lam, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Phua Hwee Tang, Ling Ling Chan
BDCAT2
2018 Development of a Radiology Decision Support System for the Classification of MRI Brain Scans
abstract
Previous studies revealed that the ordering of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans following American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines showed a higher percentage of brain abnormalities compared to scans that do not. As the process of manually labelling patient orders obtained from a local tertiary hospital in accordance to ACR guidelines is intensive and time consuming, this study aims to develop predictive machine learning models; Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB), to automate the classification process through text mining methods and derive insights that are useful for future clinical decision-making and resource optimization. Using 1,924 observations as the labelled training data, RF and XGB were found to be the best performing robust models with ROC values of 0.9459 and 0.9508 respectively on the validation set (481 observations). Further exploration into the interpretability of black-box algorithms using the model agnostic LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) framework was used to generate further insights for decisions made using a separate XGB model with respect to individual patients. The LIME framework is a significant first step towards the development of a comprehensive decision support system for patient-level decisions in the ordering of MRI scans.
Alwin Yaoxian Zhang, Sean Shao Wei Lam, Nan Liu 0003, Ling Ling Chan, Phua Hwee Tang
BDCAT2