Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Barkoczi

dblp:176/0148 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-6939-7761ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 33% Data mining · 33% Web and social media mining · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.412020
The Structure of Social Influence in Recommender Networks · WWW 2020
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › instance-based learning
k-nearest neighbor
0.412020
The Structure of Social Influence in Recommender Networks · WWW 2020
Web and social media mining
social influence
0.412020
The Structure of Social Influence in Recommender Networks · WWW 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted k-nearest neighbors · 0.9network science methods · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 The Structure of Social Influence in Recommender Networks
abstract
People’s ability to influence others’ opinion on matters of taste varies greatly—both offline and in recommender systems. What are the mechanisms underlying these striking differences? Using the weighted k-nearest neighbors algorithm (k-nn) to represent an array of social learning strategies, we show—leveraging methods from network science—how the k-nn algorithm gives rise to networks of social influence in six real-world domains of taste. We show three novel results that apply both to offline advice taking and online recommender settings. First, influential individuals have mainstream tastes and high dispersion in their taste similarity with others. Second, the fewer people an individual or algorithm consults (i.e., the lower k is) or the larger the weight placed on the opinions of more similar others, the smaller the group of people with substantial influence. Third, the influence networks emerging from deploying the k-nn algorithm are hierarchically organized. Our results shed new light on classic empirical findings in communication and network science and can help improve the understanding of social influence offline and online.
Pantelis P. Analytis, Daniel Barkoczi, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Stefan M. Herzog
WWW2
2016 Collective search on rugged landscapes: A cross-environmental analysis
Daniel Barkoczi, Pantelis P. Analytis, Charley M. Wu
CogSci1
2015 You 're special, but it doesn't matter if you 're a greenhorn: Social recommender strategies for mere mortals
Pantelis P. Analytis, Daniel Barkoczi, Stefan M. Herzog
CogSci2
2015 Wisdom of Randomly Assembled Small Crowds
Mirta Galesic, Daniel Barkoczi, Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos
CogSci2
2013 Social Learning in Complex Networks: The Role of Building Blocks and Environmental Change
Daniel Barkoczi, Mirta Galesic
CogSci1