Adam Li

dblp:176/3454 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1135-2506ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32% Motion planning and robot control · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 39% Data integration and cleaning · 30% Distributed and cloud data management · 30%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.912025
Let us Make a Splan: Risk-Aware Trajectory Optimization in a Normalized Gaussian Splat · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
causal disentanglement
0.812024
Disentangled Representation Learning in Non-Markovian Causal Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal graph
0.812024
Disentangled Representation Learning in Non-Markovian Causal Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.812024
Disentangled Representation Learning in Non-Markovian Causal Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
latent causal variable
0.812024
Disentangled Representation Learning in Non-Markovian Causal Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.712023
Causal discovery from observational and interventional data across multiple environments · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.712023
Causal discovery from observational and interventional data across multiple environments · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
constraint-based causal discovery
0.712023
Causal discovery from observational and interventional data across multiple environments · NeurIPS 2023
Data integration and cleaning
data warehouse
0.512021
Napa: Powering Scalable Data Warehousing with Robust Query Performance at Google · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Distributed and cloud data management
geo-distributed data management
0.512021
Napa: Powering Scalable Data Warehousing with Robust Query Performance at Google · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Query processing and optimization
view maintenance
0.512021
Napa: Powering Scalable Data Warehousing with Robust Query Performance at Google · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision › neural rendering
3d gaussian splatting
0.312025
Let us Make a Splan: Risk-Aware Trajectory Optimization in a Normalized Gaussian Splat · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene modeling
scene representation
0.312025
Let us Make a Splan: Risk-Aware Trajectory Optimization in a Normalized Gaussian Splat · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.212024
Disentangled Representation Learning in Non-Markovian Causal Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
do-calculus
0.212023
Causal discovery from observational and interventional data across multiple environments · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

normalized reformulation · 0.9gaussian splatting · 0.9collision probability bounding · 0.9graphical criteria · 0.8s-markov property · 0.7do-calculus · 0.7S-FCI · 0.7multi-datacenter replication · 0.5materialized view maintenance · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Let us Make a Splan: Risk-Aware Trajectory Optimization in a Normalized Gaussian Splat
abstract
Neural Radiance Fields and Gaussian Splatting have recently transformed computer vision by enabling photo-realistic representations of complex scenes. However, they have seen limited application in real-world robotics tasks such as trajectory optimization. This is due to the difficulty in reasoning about collisions in radiance models and the computational complexity associated with operating in dense models. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing SPLANNING, a risk-aware trajectory optimizer operating in a Gaussian Splatting model. This paper first derives a method to rigorously upper-bound the probability of collision between a robot and a radiance field. Then, this paper introduces a normalized reformulation of Gaussian Splatting that enables efficient computation of this collision bound. Finally, this paper presents a method to optimize trajectories that avoid collisions in a Gaussian Splat. Experiments show that SPLANNING outperforms state-of-the-art methods in generating collision-free trajectories in cluttered environments. The proposed system is also tested on a real-world robot manipulator. A project page is available athttps://roahmlab.github.io/splanning.
Jonathan B. Michaux, Seth Isaacson, Challen Enninful Adu, Adam Li, Rahul Kashyap Swayampakula, Parker Ewen, Sean Rice, Katherine A. Skinner, Ramanarayan Vasudevan
IEEE Trans. Robotics4
2024 Disentangled Representation Learning in Non-Markovian Causal Systems
abstract
Considering various data modalities, such as images, videos, and text, humans perform causal reasoning using high-level causal variables, as opposed to operating at the low, pixel level from which the data comes. In practice, most causal reasoning methods assume that the data is described as granular as the underlying causal generative factors, which is often violated in various AI tasks. This mismatch translates into a lack of guarantees in various tasks such as generative modeling, decision-making, fairness, and generalizability, to cite a few. In this paper, we acknowledge this issue and study the problem of causal disentangled representation learning from a combination of data gathered from various heterogeneous domains and assumptions in the form of a latent causal graph. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed work is the first to consider i) non-Markovian causal settings, where there may be unobserved confounding, ii) arbitrary distributions that arise from multiple domains, and iii) a relaxed version of disentanglement. Specifically, we introduce graphical criteria that allow for disentanglement under various conditions. Building on these results, we develop an algorithm that returns a causal disentanglement map, highlighting which latent variables can be disentangled given the combination of data and assumptions. The theory is corroborated by experiments.
Adam Li, Yushu Pan, Elias Bareinboim
NeurIPS1
2023 Causal discovery from observational and interventional data across multiple environments
abstract
A fundamental problem in many sciences is the learning of causal structure underlying a system, typically through observation and experimentation. Commonly, one even collects data across multiple domains, such as gene sequencing from different labs, or neural recordings from different species. Although there exist methods for learning the equivalence class of causal diagrams from observational and experimental data, they are meant to operate in a single domain. In this paper, we develop a fundamental approach to structure learning in non-Markovian systems (i.e. when there exist latent confounders) leveraging observational and interventional data collected from multiple domains. Specifically, we start by showing that learning from observational data in multiple domains is equivalent to learning from interventional data with unknown targets in a single domain. But there are also subtleties when considering observational and experimental data. Using causal invariances derived from do-calculus, we define a property called S-Markov that connects interventional distributions from multiple-domains to graphical criteria on a selection diagram. Leveraging the S-Markov property, we introduce a new constraint-based causal discovery algorithm, S-FCI, that can learn from observational and interventional data from different domains. We prove that the algorithm is sound and subsumes existing constraint-based causal discovery algorithms.
Adam Li, Amin Jaber, Elias Bareinboim
NeurIPS1
2021 Napa: Powering Scalable Data Warehousing with Robust Query Performance at Google
abstract
Google services continuously generate vast amounts of application data. This data provides valuable insights to business users. We need to store and serve these planet-scale data sets under the extremely demanding requirements of scalability, sub-second query response times, availability, and strong consistency; all this while ingesting a massive stream of updates from applications used around the globe. We have developed and deployed in production an analytical data management system, Napa, to meet these requirements. Napa is the backend for numerous clients in Google. These clients have a strong expectation of variance-free, robust query performance. At its core, Napa's principal technologies for robust query performance include the aggressive use of materialized views, which are maintained consistently as new data is ingested across multiple data centers. Our clients also demand flexibility in being able to adjust their query performance, data freshness, and costs to suit their unique needs. Robust query processing and flexible configuration of client databases are the hallmark of Napa design. Most of the related work in this area takes advantage of full flexibility to design the whole system without the need to support a diverse set of preexisting use cases. In comparison, a particular challenge we faced is that Napa needs to deal with hard constraints from existing applications and infrastructure, so we could not do a "green field" system, but rather had to satisfy existing constraints. These constraints led us to make particular design decisions and also devise new techniques to meet the challenges. In this paper, we share our experiences in designing, implementing, deploying, and running Napa in production with some of Google's most demanding applications.
Ankur Agiwal, Gokul Nath Babu Manoharan, Indrajit Roy 0001, Jagan Sankaranarayanan, Hao Zhang 0029, Tao Zou 0002, Jim Chen, Thanh Do, Haoyan Geng, Raman Grover, Yanlai Huang, Adam Li, Jianyi Liang, Xi Mao, Maya Meng, Prashant Mishra, Rajesh Sr, Vijayshankar Raman, Sourashis Roy, Mayank Singh Shishodia, Tianhang Sun, Justin Tang, Jun'ichi Tatemura, Sagar Trehan, Ramkumar Vadali, Prasanna Venkatasubramanian, Joey Zhang, Zeleng Zhuang, Goetz Graefe, Divyakant Agrawal, Jeffrey F. Naughton, Sujata Kosalge, Hakan Hacigümüs
Proc. VLDB Endow.17
2016 Technological Shaping of Verbal Working Memory: A Difference between Chinese Phonology-Based and Orthography-Based Typing
Jenn-Yeu Chen, Adam Li
CogSci2
2013 Statistical Learning in Non-Chinese Speakers Exposed to a Sequence of Words without Spaces
Tsanyu Wang, Adam Li, Yeou-Teh Liu, Jenn-Yeu Chen
CogSci2