Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gregory Vaksman
dblp:176/5329
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 62% Deep learning architectures and training · 38% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image restoration |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | PatchCraft Self-Supervised Training for Correlated Image Denoising · CVPR 2023 SNIPS: Solving Noisy Inverse Problems Stochastically · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
self-supervised denoising |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PatchCraft Self-Supervised Training for Correlated Image Denoising · CVPR 2023 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PatchCraft Self-Supervised Training for Correlated Image Denoising · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Patch Craft: Video Denoising by Deep Modeling and Patch Matching · ICCV 2021 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image deblurring |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SNIPS: Solving Noisy Inverse Problems Stochastically · NeurIPS 2021 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › inverse problem
linear inverse problem |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SNIPS: Solving Noisy Inverse Problems Stochastically · NeurIPS 2021 |
Image and video processing
super-resolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SNIPS: Solving Noisy Inverse Problems Stochastically · NeurIPS 2021 |
Image and video processing › video restoration
video denoising |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Patch Craft: Video Denoising by Deep Modeling and Patch Matching · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
patch-craft image synthesis · 1.3burst imaging · 1.3self-similarity · 1.0patch matching · 1.0convolutional neural network · 1.0singular value decomposition · 0.5newton's method · 0.5langevin dynamics · 0.5MMSE Gaussian denoiser · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | PatchCraft Self-Supervised Training for Correlated Image DenoisingabstractSupervised neural networks are known to achieve excellent results in various image restoration tasks. However, such training requires datasets composed of pairs of corrupted images and their corresponding ground truth targets. Unfortunately, such data is not available in many applications. For the task of image denoising in which the noise statistics is unknown, several self-supervised training methods have been proposed for overcoming this difficulty. Some of these require knowledge of the noise model, while others assume that the contaminating noise is uncorrelated, both assumptions are too limiting for many practical needs. This work proposes a novel self-supervised training technique suitable for the removal of unknown correlated noise. The proposed approach neither requires knowledge of the noise model nor access to ground truth targets. The input to our algorithm consists of easily captured bursts of noisy shots. Our algorithm constructs artificial patch-craft images from these bursts by patch matching and stitching, and the obtained crafted images are used as targets for the training. Our method does not require registration of the images within the burst. We evaluate the proposed framework through extensive experiments with synthetic and real image noise. Gregory Vaksman, Michael Elad |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | Image Denoising: The Deep Learning Revolution and Beyond - A Survey PaperabstractAbstract. Image denoising—removal of additive white Gaussian noise from an image—is one of the oldest and most studied problems in image processing. Extensive work over several decades has led to thousands of papers on this subject, and to many well-performing algorithms for this task. Indeed, 10 years ago, these achievements led some researchers to suspect that “Denoising is Dead,” in the sense that all that can be achieved in this domain has already been obtained. However, this turned out to be far from the truth, with the penetration of deep learning (DL) into the realm of image processing. The era of DL brought a revolution to image denoising, both by taking the lead in today’s ability for noise suppression in images, and by broadening the scope of denoising problems being treated. Our paper starts by describing this evolution, highlighting in particular the tension and synergy that exist between classical approaches and modern artificial intelligence (AI) alternatives in design of image denoisers. The recent transitions in the field of image denoising go far beyond the ability to design better denoisers. In the second part of this paper we focus on recently discovered abilities and prospects of image denoisers. We expose the possibility of using image denoisers for service of other problems, such as regularizing general inverse problems and serving as the prime engine in diffusion-based image synthesis. We also unveil the (strange?) idea that denoising and other inverse problems might not have a unique solution, as common algorithms would have us believe. Instead, we describe constructive ways to produce randomized and diverse high perceptual quality results for inverse problems, all fueled by the progress that DL brought to image denoising. This is a survey paper, and its prime goal is to provide a broad view of the history of the field of image denoising and closely related topics in image processing. Our aim is to give a better context to recent discoveries, and to the influence of the AI revolution in our domain. Michael Elad, Bahjat Kawar, Gregory Vaksman |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 3 |
| 2021 | Patch Craft: Video Denoising by Deep Modeling and Patch MatchingabstractThe non-local self-similarity property of natural images has been exploited extensively for solving various image processing problems. When it comes to video sequences, harnessing this force is even more beneficial due to the temporal redundancy. In the context of image and video denoising, many classically-oriented algorithms employ self-similarity, splitting the data into overlapping patches, gathering groups of similar ones and processing these together somehow. With the emergence of convolutional neural networks (CNN), the patch-based framework has been abandoned. Most CNN denoisers operate on the whole image, leveraging non-local relations only implicitly by using a large receptive field. This work proposes a novel approach for leveraging self-similarity in the context of video denoising, while still relying on a regular convolutional architecture. We introduce a concept of patch-craft frames – artificial frames that are similar to the real ones, built by tiling matched patches. Our algorithm augments video sequences with patch-craft frames and feeds them to a CNN. We demonstrate the substantial boost in denoising performance obtained with the proposed approach. Gregory Vaksman, Michael Elad, Peyman Milanfar |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | SNIPS: Solving Noisy Inverse Problems StochasticallyabstractIn this work we introduce a novel stochastic algorithm dubbed SNIPS, which draws samples from the posterior distribution of any linear inverse problem, where the observation is assumed to be contaminated by additive white Gaussian noise. Our solution incorporates ideas from Langevin dynamics and Newton's method, and exploits a pre-trained minimum mean squared error (MMSE) Gaussian denoiser. The proposed approach relies on an intricate derivation of the posterior score function that includes a singular value decomposition (SVD) of the degradation operator, in order to obtain a tractable iterative algorithm for the desired sampling. Due to its stochasticity, the algorithm can produce multiple high perceptual quality samples for the same noisy observation. We demonstrate the abilities of the proposed paradigm for image deblurring, super-resolution, and compressive sensing. We show that the samples produced are sharp, detailed and consistent with the given measurements, and their diversity exposes the inherent uncertainty in the inverse problem being solved. Bahjat Kawar, Gregory Vaksman, Michael Elad |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2016 | Patch Ordering as a Regularization for Inverse Problems in Image ProcessingabstractRecent work in image processing suggests that operating on (overlapping) patches in an image may lead to state-of-the-art results. This has been demonstrated for a variety of problems including denoising, inpainting, deblurring, and super-resolution. The work reported in [I. Ram, I. Cohen, and M. Elad, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 23 (2014), pp. 2779--2792] and [I. Ram, M. Elad, and I. Cohen, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 22 (2013), pp. 2764--2774] takes an extra step forward by showing that ordering these patches to form an approximate shortest path can be leveraged for better processing. The core idea is to apply a simple filter on the resulting 1D smoothed signal obtained after the patch-permutation. This idea has been also explored in combination with a wavelet pyramid, leading eventually to a sophisticated and highly effective regularizer for inverse problems in imaging. In this work we further study the patch-permutation concept and harness it to propose a new simple yet effective regularization for image restoration problems. Our approach builds on the classic maximum a posteriori probability (MAP), with a penalty function consisting of a regular log-likelihood term and a novel permutation-based regularization term. Using a plain 1D Laplacian, the proposed regularization forces robust smoothness ($L1$) on the permuted pixels. Since the permutation originates from patch ordering, we propose to accumulate the smoothness terms over all of the patches' pixels. Furthermore, we take into account the found distances between adjacent patches in the ordering by weighting the Laplacian outcome. We demonstrate the proposed scheme on the following diverse set of problems: (i) severe Poisson image denoising, (ii) Gaussian image denoising, (iii) image deblurring, and (iv) single image super-resolution. In all of these cases, we use recent methods that handle these problems as initialization to our scheme. This is followed by an L-BFGS optimization of the above-described penalty function, leading to state-of-the-art results, especially for highly ill-posed cases. Gregory Vaksman, Michael Zibulevsky, Michael Elad |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 1 |