Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marie Denis

dblp:176/9875 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1693-9894ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 72% Computational science and engineering · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
hierarchical model
0.212016
Evaluation of hierarchical models for integrative genomic analyses · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
integrative genomics
0.212016
Evaluation of hierarchical models for integrative genomic analyses · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multi-omics data integration
0.212016
Evaluation of hierarchical models for integrative genomic analyses · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.112016
Evaluation of hierarchical models for integrative genomic analyses · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis
0.112016
Evaluation of hierarchical models for integrative genomic analyses · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

penalized likelihood · 0.2expectation-maximization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Bayesian Approach Integrating Prior Knowledge for Identifying miRNA-mRNA Interactions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
abstract
Oncogenesis, a complex and multifaceted process, is profoundly modulated by miRNA's regulatory role in gene expression. Over the years, a substantial body of knowledge concerning miRNA and mRNA has been accumulated, drawing from both rigorous biological experiments and intricate statistical analyses. In the realm of statistical modeling, the integration of such information as "prior knowledge" often amplifies the model's ability to pinpoint molecular targets of significance. This study seeks to leverage prior knowledge of miRNA-mRNA regulatory interactions to map the dynamic landscape of interactions in the specific context of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To address this, we introduce an evolved iteration of a Bayesian two-step integrative method previously established in the literature. This augmented approach includes improved computing efficiency when dealing with high dimensional data and a novel mechanistic submodel, which operates autonomously, devoid of prior knowledge. Employing this method, we identified two discrete gene lists: one informed by prior knowledge and the other independently inferred. This bifurcated strategy provides a comprehensive perspective on gene interactions. Our methodological advancement allows for a nuanced analysis of gene networks, distinguishing between direct and indirect gene relationships and considering miRNA influences with two available sub-mechanistic submodels. We introduce an approach to validate our findings using a biological interaction network, emphasizing the quality and relevance of identified gene-gene relationships. Metrics like the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) and the true discovery rate (TDR) further attest to the robustness of our findings. In summation, aside from improving the existing sub-mechanistic model that requires prior knowledge, this paper presents an innovative prior knowledge-free sub-mechanistic model as an alternative. It champions the use of biological networks for validation, underscoring the significance of methodological advancements in genomics research.
Marie Denis, Rency S. Varghese, Sidharth S. Jain, Mahlet G. Tadesse, Habtom W. Ressom
BIBM2
2016 Evaluation of hierarchical models for integrative genomic analyses
abstract
MOTIVATION: Advances in high-throughput technologies have led to the acquisition of various types of -omic data on the same biological samples. Each data type gives independent and complementary information that can explain the biological mechanisms of interest. While several studies performing independent analyses of each dataset have led to significant results, a better understanding of complex biological mechanisms requires an integrative analysis of different sources of data. RESULTS: Flexible modeling approaches, based on penalized likelihood methods and expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms, are studied and tested under various biological relationship scenarios between the different molecular features and their effects on a clinical outcome. The models are applied to genomic datasets from two cancer types in the Cancer Genome Atlas project: glioblastoma multiforme and ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. The integrative models lead to improved model fit and predictive performance. They also provide a better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying patients' survival. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code implementing the integrative models is freely available at https://github.com/mgt000/IntegrativeAnalysis along with example datasets and sample R script applying the models to these data. The TCGA datasets used for analysis are publicly available at https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/tcgaDownload.jsp CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Marie Denis, Mahlet G. Tadesse
Bioinform.1