Higher-dimensional automata (HDA) are a model of concurrency that models simultaneous execution of events using higher dimensional cells. HDA recognize languages of pomsets, a generalization of finite words whose letters are partially ordered. We prove a new algebraic characterization of HDA languages: a language of pomsets is regular if and only if it is the inverse image of a functor from the category of pomsets into a finite category. Furthermore, the language is definable in first-order logic exactly when it is recognized by an aperiodic category, generalizing the McNaughton-Papert theorem to HDA languages. We also investigate a notion of counter-free HDA, and show that if a language is accepted by a counter-free HDA, it must be definable in first-order logic. The converse, however, is still open.

Higher-Dimensional Automata (HDAs) provide a geometric model of true concurrency. While hereditary history-preserving (hhp) bisimilarity is the finest behavioural equivalence in van Glabbeek's spectrum, no modal logic has previously characterised it on HDAs. We introduce several new intermediate equivalences that sit strictly between ST- and hhp-bisimilarity. We show how separating similarity and subsumption of paths leads to a clean formulation of these equivalences, and we present a modal logic that characterises hhp-bisimilarity. Natural fragments characterise ST-bisimilarity and the intermediate notions.

We establish a Myhill-Nerode type theorem for higher-dimensional automata (HDAs), stating that a language is regular if and only if it has finite prefix quotient. HDAs extend standard automata with additional structure, making it possible to distinguish between interleavings and concurrency. We also introduce deterministic HDAs and show that not all HDAs are determinizable, that is, there exist regular languages that cannot be recognised by a deterministic HDA. Using our theorem, we develop an internal characterisation of deterministic languages. Lastly, we develop analogues of the Myhill-Nerode construction and of determinacy for HDAs with interfaces.

We prove a Kleene theorem for higher-dimensional automata. It states that the languages they recognise are precisely the rational subsumption-closed sets of finite interval pomsets. The rational operations on these languages include a gluing composition, for which we equip pomsets with interfaces. For our proof, we introduce higher-dimensional automata with interfaces, which are modelled as presheaves over labelled precube categories, and develop tools and techniques inspired by algebraic topology, such as cylinders and (co)fibrations. Higher-dimensional automata form a general model of non-interleaving concurrency, which subsumes many other approaches. Interval orders are used as models for concurrent and distributed systems where events extend in time. Our tools and techniques may therefore yield templates for Kleene theorems in various models and applications.

We prove a Kleene theorem for higher-dimensional automata (HDAs). It states that the languages they recognise are precisely the rational subsumption-closed sets of interval pomsets. The rational operations include a gluing composition, for which we equip pomsets with interfaces. For our proof, we introduce HDAs with interfaces as presheaves over labelled precube categories and use tools inspired by algebraic topology, such as cylinders and (co)fibrations. HDAs are a general model of non-interleaving concurrency, which subsumes many other models in this field. Interval orders are used as models for concurrent or distributed systems where events extend in time. Our tools and techniques may therefore yield templates for Kleene theorems in various models and applications.

Abstract We introduce languages of higher-dimensional automata (HDAs) and develop some of their properties. To this end, we define a new category of precubical sets, uniquely naturally isomorphic to the standard one, and introduce a notion of event consistency. HDAs are then finite, labeled, event-consistent precubical sets with distinguished subsets of initial and accepting cells. Their languages are sets of interval orders closed under subsumption; as a major technical step, we expose a bijection between interval orders and a subclass of HDAs. We show that any finite subsumption-closed set of interval orders is the language of an HDA, that languages of HDAs are closed under binary unions and parallel composition, and that bisimilarity implies language equivalence.