Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chester C.-A. Lee

dblp:177/1280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1973
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 77% Parallel and multicore computing · 23%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
queueing network model
0.011973
The Effect on Throughput of Multiprocessing in a Multiprogramming Environment · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Operating systems › resource management › process management
multiprogramming
0.011973
The Effect on Throughput of Multiprocessing in a Multiprogramming Environment · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973
Parallel and multicore computing › concurrent system
multitasking
0.011973
The Effect on Throughput of Multiprocessing in a Multiprogramming Environment · IEEE Trans. Computers 1973

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0queueing networks · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1973 The Effect on Throughput of Multiprocessing in a Multiprogramming Environment
abstract
This paper investigates some of the effects of varying the number of central processing units (CPU's) available to a multiprogramming system both when parallel processing of a single task (multitasking) is allowed and is not allowed. The variables investigated are those that would be expected to control the CPU queue length distribution and include the degree of multiprogramming, CPU service discipline, CPU service distribution, the degree of cooperation between processors engaged in multitasking, and the ratio of CPU to I/O service capacity. The computer systems are modeled by queueing networks. Analytic results are displayed in many cases with supplementation by numeric and simulation solutions when convenient or necessary. It is demonstrated that under properly defined conditions doubling the number of CPU's in a system can more than double throughput. The effectiveness of multitasking in improving throughput is found to be fairly small if the degree of multiprogramming ranges from modest to high.
James C. Browne, K. Mani Chandy, John Hogarth, Chester C.-A. Lee
IEEE Trans. Computers4