Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tilman Rau
dblp:177/3299
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 87% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 13% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
graph neural network explanation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021 |
Medical and health informatics
computational pathology |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021 |
Medical and health informatics › computational pathology
histopathology image analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › breast cancer
breast cancer subtyping |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
layer-wise relevance propagation · 1.0graph pruning · 1.0gradient-based saliency · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational PathologyabstractExplainability of deep learning methods is imperative to facilitate their clinical adoption in digital pathology. However, popular deep learning methods and explainability techniques (explainers) based on pixel-wise processing disregard biological entities’ notion, thus complicating comprehension by pathologists. In this work, we address this by adopting biological entity-based graph processing and graph explainers enabling explanations accessible to pathologists. In this context, a major challenge becomes to discern meaningful explainers, particularly in a standardized and quantifiable fashion. To this end, we propose herein a set of novel quantitative metrics based on statistics of class separability using pathologically measurable concepts to characterize graph explainers. We employ the proposed metrics to evaluate three types of graph explainers, namely the layer-wise relevance propagation, gradient-based saliency, and graph pruning approaches, to explain Cell-Graph representations for Breast Cancer Subtyping. The proposed metrics are also applicable in other domains by using domain-specific intuitive concepts. We validate the qualitative and quantitative findings on the BRACS dataset, a large cohort of breast cancer RoIs, by expert pathologists. The code, data, and models can be accessed here1. Guillaume Jaume, Pushpak Pati, Behzad Bozorgtabar, Antonio Foncubierta-Rodríguez, Anna Maria Anniciello, Florinda Feroce, Tilman Rau, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Maria Gabrani, Orcun Goksel |
CVPR | 7 |