Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tilman Rau

dblp:177/3299 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 87% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
graph neural network explanation
0.512021
Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021
Medical and health informatics
computational pathology
0.512021
Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021
Medical and health informatics › computational pathology
histopathology image analysis
0.512021
Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › breast cancer
breast cancer subtyping
0.112021
Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology · CVPR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

layer-wise relevance propagation · 1.0graph pruning · 1.0gradient-based saliency · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Quantifying Explainers of Graph Neural Networks in Computational Pathology
abstract
Explainability of deep learning methods is imperative to facilitate their clinical adoption in digital pathology. However, popular deep learning methods and explainability techniques (explainers) based on pixel-wise processing disregard biological entities’ notion, thus complicating comprehension by pathologists. In this work, we address this by adopting biological entity-based graph processing and graph explainers enabling explanations accessible to pathologists. In this context, a major challenge becomes to discern meaningful explainers, particularly in a standardized and quantifiable fashion. To this end, we propose herein a set of novel quantitative metrics based on statistics of class separability using pathologically measurable concepts to characterize graph explainers. We employ the proposed metrics to evaluate three types of graph explainers, namely the layer-wise relevance propagation, gradient-based saliency, and graph pruning approaches, to explain Cell-Graph representations for Breast Cancer Subtyping. The proposed metrics are also applicable in other domains by using domain-specific intuitive concepts. We validate the qualitative and quantitative findings on the BRACS dataset, a large cohort of breast cancer RoIs, by expert pathologists. The code, data, and models can be accessed here1.
Guillaume Jaume, Pushpak Pati, Behzad Bozorgtabar, Antonio Foncubierta-Rodríguez, Anna Maria Anniciello, Florinda Feroce, Tilman Rau, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Maria Gabrani, Orcun Goksel
CVPR7