Machine learning models are becoming increasingly complex and widely adopted. Interpretable machine learning allows us to not only make predictions but also understand the rationale behind automated decisions through explanations. Explanations are typically characterized by their scope: local explanations are generated by local surrogate models for specific instances, while global explanations aim to approximate the behavior of the entire black-box model. In this paper, we break this dichotomy of locality to explore an underexamined area that lies between these two extremes: meso-level explanations. The goal of meso-level explainability is to provide explanations using a set of meso-level interpretable models, which capture patterns at an intermediate level of abstraction. To this end, we propose GROUX, an explainable-by-design algorithm that generates meso-level explanations in the form of feature importance scores. Our approach includes a partitioning phase that identifies meso groups, followed by the training of interpretable models within each group. We evaluate GROUX on a collection of tabular datasets, reporting both the accuracy and complexity of the resulting meso models, and compare it against other meso-level explainability algorithms. Additionally, we analyze the algorithm’s sensitivity to its hyperparameters to better understand its behavior and robustness.

Decision trees are among the most popular supervised models due to their interpretability and knowledge representation resembling human reasoning. Commonly-used decision tree induction algorithms are based on greedy top-down strategies. Although these approaches are known to be an efficient heuristic, the resulting trees are only locally optimal and tend to have overly complex structures. On the other hand, optimal decision tree algorithms attempt to create an entire decision tree at once to achieve global optimality. We place our proposal between these approaches by designing a generative model for decision trees. Our method first learns a latent decision tree space through a variational architecture using pre-trained decision tree models. Then, it adopts a genetic procedure to explore such latent space to find a compact decision tree with good predictive performance. We compare our proposal against classical tree induction methods, optimal approaches, and ensemble models. The results show that our proposal can generate accurate and shallow, i.e., interpretable, decision trees.

Decision Trees are accessible, interpretable, and well-performing classification models. A plethora of variants with increasing expressiveness has been proposed in the last forty years. We contrast the two families of univariate DTs, whose split functions partition data through axis-parallel hyperplanes, and multivariate DTs, whose splits instead partition data through oblique hyperplanes. The latter include the former, hence multivariate DTs are in principle more powerful. Surprisingly enough, however, univariate DTs consistently show comparable performances in the literature. We analyze the reasons behind this, both with synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets. Our research questions test whether the pre-processing phase of removing correlation among features in datasets has an impact on the relative performances of univariate vs multivariate DTs. We find that existing benchmark datasets are likely biased towards favoring univariate DTs.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has come to prominence as one of the major components of our society, with applications in most aspects of our lives. In this field, complex and highly nonlinear machine learning models such as ensemble models, deep neural networks, and Support Vector Machines have consistently shown remarkable accuracy in solving complex tasks. Although accurate, AI models often are “black boxes” which we are not able to understand. Relying on these models has a multifaceted impact and raises significant concerns about their transparency. Applications in sensitive and critical domains are a strong motivational factor in trying to understand the behavior of black boxes. We propose to address this issue by providing an interpretable layer on top of black box models by aggregating “local” explanations. We present GLocalX, a “local-first” model agnostic explanation method. Starting from local explanations expressed in form of local decision rules, GLocalX iteratively generalizes them into global explanations by hierarchically aggregating them. Our goal is to learn accurate yet simple interpretable models to emulate the given black box, and, if possible, replace it entirely. We validate GLocalX in a set of experiments in standard and constrained settings with limited or no access to either data or local explanations. Experiments show that GLocalX is able to accurately emulate several models with simple and small models, reaching state-of-the-art performance against natively global solutions. Our findings show how it is often possible to achieve a high level of both accuracy and comprehensibility of classification models, even in complex domains with high-dimensional data, without necessarily trading one property for the other. This is a key requirement for a trustworthy AI, necessary for adoption in high-stakes decision making applications.