VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pavel Avdeyev
dblp:177/7607
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7953-6259ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dirichlet Diffusion Score Model for Biological Sequence Generation · ICML 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
biological sequence design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Dirichlet Diffusion Score Model for Biological Sequence Generation · ICML 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics
ancestral genome reconstruction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A unified ILP framework for core ancestral genome reconstruction problems · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A unified ILP framework for core ancestral genome reconstruction problems · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics
genome rearrangement |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A unified ILP framework for core ancestral genome reconstruction problems · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics
whole-genome duplication |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A unified ILP framework for core ancestral genome reconstruction problems · Bioinform. 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Dirichlet Diffusion Score Model for Biological Sequence Generation · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score-based generative modeling · 1.3dirichlet diffusion · 1.3integer linear programming · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dirichlet Diffusion Score Model for Biological Sequence GenerationabstractDesigning biological sequences is an important challenge that requires satisfying complex constraints and thus is a natural problem to address with deep generative modeling. Diffusion generative models have achieved considerable success in many applications. Score-based generative stochastic differential equations (SDE) model is a continuous-time diffusion model framework that enjoys many benefits, but the originally proposed SDEs are not naturally designed for modeling discrete data. To develop generative SDE models for discrete data such as biological sequences, here we introduce a diffusion process defined in the probability simplex space with stationary distribution being the Dirichlet distribution. This makes diffusion in continuous space natural for modeling discrete data. We refer to this approach as Dirchlet diffusion score model. We demonstrate that this technique can generate samples that satisfy hard constraints using a Sudoku generation task. This generative model can also solve Sudoku, including hard puzzles, without additional training. Finally, we applied this approach to develop the first human promoter DNA sequence design model and showed that designed sequences share similar properties with natural promoter sequences. Pavel Avdeyev, Chenlai Shi, Yuhao Tan, Kseniia Dudnyk |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | A unified ILP framework for core ancestral genome reconstruction problemsabstractMOTIVATION: One of the key computational problems in comparative genomics is the reconstruction of genomes of ancestral species based on genomes of extant species. Since most dramatic changes in genomic architectures are caused by genome rearrangements, this problem is often posed as minimization of the number of genome rearrangements between extant and ancestral genomes. The basic case of three given genomes is known as the genome median problem. Whole-genome duplications (WGDs) represent yet another type of dramatic evolutionary events and inspire the reconstruction of preduplicated ancestral genomes, referred to as the genome halving problem. Generalization of WGDs to whole-genome multiplication events leads to the genome aliquoting problem. RESULTS: In this study, we propose polynomial-size integer linear programming (ILP) formulations for the aforementioned problems. We further obtain such formulations for the restricted and conserved versions of the median and halving problems, which have been recently introduced to improve biological relevance of the solutions. Extensive evaluation of solutions to the different ILP problems demonstrates their good accuracy. Furthermore, since the ILP formulations for the conserved versions have linear size, they provide a novel practical approach to ancestral genome reconstruction, which combines the advantages of homology- and rearrangements-based methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data are available in https://github.com/AvdeevPavel/ILP-WGD-reconstructor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Pavel Avdeyev, Nikita Alexeev, Yongwu Rong, Max A. Alekseyev |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2016 | Comparative genomics meets topology: a novel view on genome median and halving problemsabstractBACKGROUND: Genome median and genome halving are combinatorial optimization problems that aim at reconstruction of ancestral genomes by minimizing the number of evolutionary events between them and genomes of the extant species. While these problems have been widely studied in past decades, their solutions are often either not efficient or not biologically adequate. These shortcomings have been recently addressed by restricting the problems solution space. RESULTS: We show that the restricted variants of genome median and halving problems are, in fact, closely related. We demonstrate that these problems have a neat topological interpretation in terms of embedded graphs and polygon gluings. We illustrate how such interpretation can lead to solutions to these problems in particular cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an unexpected link between comparative genomics and topology, and demonstrates advantages of solving genome median and halving problems within the topological framework. Nikita Alexeev, Pavel Avdeyev, Max A. Alekseyev |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |