Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Noam Shalev

dblp:177/8605 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 50% Authentication and access control · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 74% Cloud and datacenter computing · 26%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control › access control
least privilege
0.312017
WatchIT: Who Watches Your IT Guy? · SOSP 2017
Systems and software security
operating system security
0.312017
WatchIT: Who Watches Your IT Guy? · SOSP 2017
Cloud and datacenter computing › workload isolation
container isolation
0.112017
WatchIT: Who Watches Your IT Guy? · SOSP 2017
Operating systems › fault tolerance
fault tolerance mechanisms
0.112016
CSR: Core Surprise Removal in Commodity Operating Systems · ASPLOS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

resource prediction · 0.6container isolation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 WatchIT: Who Watches Your IT Guy?
abstract
System administrators have unlimited access to system resources. As the Snowden case highlighted, these permissions can be exploited to steal valuable personal, classified, or commercial data. This problem is exacerbated when a third party administers the system. For example, a bank outsourcing its IT would not want to allow administrators access to the actual data. We propose WatchIT: a strategy that constrains IT personnel's view of the system and monitors their actions. To this end, we introduce the abstraction of perforated containers -- while regular Linux containers are too restrictive to be used by system administrators, by "punching holes" in them, we strike a balance between information security and required administrative needs. Following the principle of least privilege, our system predicts which system resources should be accessible for handling each IT issue, creates a perforated container with the corresponding isolation, and deploys it as needed for fixing the problem.
Noam Shalev, Idit Keidar, Yaron Weinsberg, Yosef Moatti, Elad Ben-Yehuda
SOSP1
2016 CSR: Core Surprise Removal in Commodity Operating Systems
abstract
One of the adverse effects of shrinking transistor sizes is that processors have become increasingly prone to hardware faults. At the same time, the number of cores per die rises. Consequently, core failures can no longer be ruled out, and future operating systems for many-core machines will have to incorporate fault tolerance mechanisms.
Noam Shalev, Eran Harpaz, Hagar Meir, Idit Keidar, Yaron Weinsberg
ASPLOS1
2016 EFS: Energy-Friendly Scheduler for memory bandwidth constrained systems
Tomer Y. Morad, Noam Shalev, Idit Keidar, Avinoam Kolodny, Uri C. Weiser
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.2