Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Andor

dblp:177/8962 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Language models and text generation · 22% Information extraction and text analysis · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 16%

Topics — the 22 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
decontextualization
0.812024
Learning to Reject with a Fixed Predictor: Application to Decontextualization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
selective classification
0.812024
Learning to Reject with a Fixed Predictor: Application to Decontextualization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
distributed training systems
0.712023
Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training
0.712023
Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.412019
Synthetic QA Corpora Generation with Roundtrip Consistency · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension
0.412019
Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehension · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
numerical reasoning
0.412019
Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehension · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.312018
Linguistically-Informed Self-Attention for Semantic Role Labeling · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.312018
A Challenge Set and Methods for Noun-Verb Ambiguity · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling
0.312018
Linguistically-Informed Self-Attention for Semantic Role Labeling · EMNLP 2018
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
loop closure detection
0.212016
Real-time loop closure in 2D LIDAR SLAM · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.212016
Real-time loop closure in 2D LIDAR SLAM · ICRA 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function › surrogate loss › consistency of surrogate losses
h-consistency
0.212024
Learning to Reject with a Fixed Predictor: Application to Decontextualization · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function
surrogate loss
0.212024
Learning to Reject with a Fixed Predictor: Application to Decontextualization · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.212023
Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
BERT
0.112019
Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehension · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
extractive question answering
0.112019
Synthetic QA Corpora Generation with Roundtrip Consistency · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.112019
Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehension · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network › bidirectional recurrent network
bidirectional LSTM
0.112018
Morphosyntactic Tagging with a Meta-BiLSTM Model over Context Sensitive Token Encodings · ACL (1) 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.112018
Morphosyntactic Tagging with a Meta-BiLSTM Model over Context Sensitive Token Encodings · ACL (1) 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention
0.112018
Linguistically-Informed Self-Attention for Semantic Role Labeling · EMNLP 2018
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
text-to-speech synthesis
0.112018
A Challenge Set and Methods for Noun-Verb Ambiguity · EMNLP 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

surrogate loss minimization · 0.8sequence-to-sequence pre-training · 0.4reading comprehension · 0.4question generation · 0.4arithmetic operation prediction · 0.4answer extraction · 0.4BERT fine-tuning · 0.4meta-BiLSTM · 0.3contextual word embeddings · 0.3contextual token encodings · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning to Reject with a Fixed Predictor: Application to Decontextualization
abstract
We study the problem of classification with a reject option for a fixed predictor, crucial to natural language processing. We introduce a new problem formulation for this scenario, and an algorithm minimizing a new surrogate loss function. We provide a complete theoretical analysis of the surrogate loss function with a strong $H$-consistency guarantee. For evaluation, we choose the \textit{decontextualization} task, and provide a manually-labelled dataset of $2\mathord,000$ examples. Our algorithm significantly outperforms the baselines considered, with a $\sim 25$% improvement in coverage when halving the error rate, which is only $\sim 3$% away from the theoretical limit.
Christopher Mohri, Daniel Andor, Eunsol Choi, Michael Collins 0001, Anqi Mao, Yutao Zhong 0002
ICLR2
2023 Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio
abstract
Scaling up training datasets and model parameters have benefited neural network-based language models, but also present challenges like distributed compute, input data bottlenecks and reproducibility of results. We introduce two simple and scalable software libraries that simplify these issues: t5x enables training large language models at scale, while seqio enables reproducible input and evaluation pipelines. These open-source libraries have been used to train models with hundreds of billions of parameters on multi-terabyte datasets. Configurations and instructions for T5-like and GPT-like models are also provided. The libraries can be found at https://github.com/google-research/t5x and https://github.com/google/seqio.
Adam Roberts, Hyung Won Chung, Anselm Levskaya, Daniel Andor, Sharan Narang, Brian Lester, Colin Gaffney, Afroz Mohiuddin, Curtis Hawthorne, Aitor Lewkowycz, Alex Salcianu, Marc van Zee, Jacob Austin, Sebastian Goodman, Livio B. Soares, Haitang Hu, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Jasmijn Bastings, Jannis Bulian, Xavier Garcia, Jianmo Ni, Kathleen Kenealy, Kehang Han, Michelle Casbon, Jonathan H. Clark, Stephan Lee, Dan Garrette, James Lee-Thorp, Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Marvin Ritter, Maarten Bosma, Alexandre Tachard Passos, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, Noah Fiedel, Mark Omernick, Brennan Saeta, Ryan Sepassi, Alexander Spiridonov, Joshua Newlan, Andrea Gesmundo
J. Mach. Learn. Res.6
2021 QED: A Framework and Dataset for Explanations in Question Answering
abstract
A question answering system that in addition to providing an answer provides an explanation of the reasoning that leads to that answer has potential advantages in terms of debuggability, extensibility, and trust. To this end, we propose QED, a linguistically informed, extensible framework for explanations in question answering. A QED explanation specifies the relationship between a question and answer according to formal semantic notions such as referential equality, sentencehood, and entailment. We describe and publicly release an expert-annotated dataset of QED explanations built upon a subset of the Google Natural Questions dataset, and report baseline models on two tasks—post- hoc explanation generation given an answer, and joint question answering and explanation generation. In the joint setting, a promising result suggests that training on a relatively small amount of QED data can improve question answering. In addition to describing the formal, language-theoretic motivations for the QED approach, we describe a large user study showing that the presence of QED explanations significantly improves the ability of untrained raters to spot errors made by a strong neural QA baseline.
Matthew Lamm, Jennimaria Palomaki, Christopher Alberti, Daniel Andor, Eunsol Choi, Livio B. Soares, Michael Collins 0001
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics4
2019 Synthetic QA Corpora Generation with Roundtrip Consistency
abstract
We introduce a novel method of generating synthetic question answering corpora by combining models of question generation and answer extraction, and by filtering the results to ensure roundtrip consistency.By pretraining on the resulting corpora we obtain significant improvements on SQuAD2 (Rajpurkar et al., 2018) and NQ (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), establishing a new state-of-the-art on the latter.Our synthetic data generation models, for both question generation and answer extraction, can be fully reproduced by finetuning a publicly available BERT model (Devlin et al., 2018) on the extractive subsets of SQuAD2 and NQ.We also describe a more powerful variant that does full sequence-to-sequence pretraining for question generation, obtaining exact match and F1 at less than 0.1% and 0.4% from human performance on SQuAD2.
Christopher Alberti, Daniel Andor, Emily Pitler, Jacob Devlin, Michael Collins 0001
ACL (1)2
2019 Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehension
abstract
Daniel Andor, Luheng He, Kenton Lee, Emily Pitler. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Daniel Andor, Luheng He, Kenton Lee, Emily Pitler
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)1
2018 Morphosyntactic Tagging with a Meta-BiLSTM Model over Context Sensitive Token Encodings
abstract
Bernd Bohnet, Ryan McDonald, Gonçalo Simões, Daniel Andor, Emily Pitler, Joshua Maynez. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2018.
Bernd Bohnet, Ryan T. McDonald, Gonçalo Simões, Daniel Andor, Emily Pitler, Joshua Maynez
ACL (1)4
2018 A Challenge Set and Methods for Noun-Verb Ambiguity
abstract
English part-of-speech taggers regularly make egregious errors related to noun-verb ambiguity, despite having achieved 97%+ accuracy on the WSJ Penn Treebank since 2002.These mistakes have been difficult to quantify and make taggers less useful to downstream tasks such as translation and text-to-speech synthesis.This paper creates a new dataset of over 30,000 naturally-occurring non-trivial examples of noun-verb ambiguity.Taggers within 1% of each other when measured on the WSJ have accuracies ranging from 57% to 75% accuracy on this challenge set.Enhancing the strongest existing tagger with contextual word embeddings and targeted training data improves its accuracy to 89%, a 14% absolute (52% relative) improvement.Downstream, using just this enhanced tagger yields a 28% reduction in error over the prior best learned model for homograph disambiguation for textto-speech synthesis.
Ali El-Kahky, Kellie Webster, Daniel Andor, Emily Pitler
EMNLP3
2018 Linguistically-Informed Self-Attention for Semantic Role Labeling
abstract
Current state-of-the-art semantic role labeling (SRL) uses a deep neural network with no explicit linguistic features.However, prior work has shown that gold syntax trees can dramatically improve SRL decoding, suggesting the possibility of increased accuracy from explicit modeling of syntax.In this work, we present linguistically-informed self-attention (LISA): a neural network model that combines multi-head self-attention with multi-task learning across dependency parsing, part-ofspeech tagging, predicate detection and SRL.Unlike previous models which require significant pre-processing to prepare linguistic features, LISA can incorporate syntax using merely raw tokens as input, encoding the sequence only once to simultaneously perform parsing, predicate detection and role labeling for all predicates.Syntax is incorporated by training one attention head to attend to syntactic parents for each token.Moreover, if a high-quality syntactic parse is already available, it can be beneficially injected at test time without re-training our SRL model.In experiments on CoNLL-2005 SRL, LISA achieves new state-of-the-art performance for a model using predicted predicates and standard word embeddings, attaining 2.5 F1 absolute higher than the previous state-of-the-art on newswire and more than 3.5 F1 on outof-domain data, nearly 10% reduction in error.On ConLL-2012 English SRL we also show an improvement of more than 2.5 F1.LISA also out-performs the state-of-the-art with contextually-encoded (ELMo) word representations, by nearly 1.0 F1 on news and more than 2.0 F1 on out-of-domain text.
Emma Strubell, Patrick Verga, Daniel Andor, David Weiss 0001, Andrew McCallum
EMNLP3
2016 Globally Normalized Transition-Based Neural Networks
abstract
Daniel Andor, Chris Alberti, David Weiss, Aliaksei Severyn, Alessandro Presta, Kuzman Ganchev, Slav Petrov, Michael Collins. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2016.
Daniel Andor, Christopher Alberti, David Weiss 0001, Aliaksei Severyn, Alessandro Presta, Kuzman Ganchev, Slav Petrov, Michael Collins 0001
ACL (1)1
2016 Real-time loop closure in 2D LIDAR SLAM
abstract
Portable laser range-finders, further referred to as LIDAR, and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) are an efficient method of acquiring as-built floor plans. Generating and visualizing floor plans in real-time helps the operator assess the quality and coverage of capture data. Building a portable capture platform necessitates operating under limited computational resources. We present the approach used in our backpack mapping platform which achieves real-time mapping and loop closure at a 5 cm resolution. To achieve realtime loop closure, we use a branch-and-bound approach for computing scan-to-submap matches as constraints. We provide experimental results and comparisons to other well known approaches which show that, in terms of quality, our approach is competitive with established techniques.
Wolfgang Hess, Damon Kohler, Holger Rapp, Daniel Andor
ICRA4